It is currently 24 Nov 2017, 00:59

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on - Q1

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2013
Posts: 6

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 11

Concentration: Marketing
Re: It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on - Q1 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jun 2013, 21:58
I picked E and realized why it's wrong. Who cares about strains of bacteria that originated on Earth? I picked this because I was thinking, oh well if the strains on earth died out, the bacteria that is from Mars MAY be comparable...but who cares? The conclusion is saying, so if bacteria DID come from Mars, it probably died out. D is the best choice because maybe the bacteria now IS from Mars...therefore it didn't die out (and we are assuming that the bacteria here is from Earth instead).

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 11

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Time to apply!
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 197

Kudos [?]: 148 [0], given: 166

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V29
GMAT 3: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.2
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Re: It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on - Q1 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jun 2013, 23:53
still I have conusion with (d) and (e)

Could anyone explain why (d) is wrong
Regards
_________________

Didn't give up !!! Still Trying!!

Kudos [?]: 148 [0], given: 166

Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1124

Kudos [?]: 3557 [0], given: 123

Location: United States
Premium Member
Re: It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on - Q1 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jun 2013, 01:31
Practicegmat wrote:
still I have conusion with (d) and (e)

Could anyone explain why (d) is wrong
Regards


Hi Practicegmat.

I think your question is wrong cause D is correct. Probably, your question is "why E is wrong?" if that's true, so this is my explanation.

Conclusion is: if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out because no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets.

What should we attack? We weaken the conclusion by showing that all bacteria on Earth now were transported to Earth from Mars and NOT died out later.

But (E) It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out.


E does not attack the conclusion at all. There would be the case that some bacteria originated on Earth died out later and bacteria transported from Mars to Earth also died out.

Hence E is incorrect.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Kudos [?]: 3557 [0], given: 123

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 147

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 41

Re: It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on - Q1 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jul 2013, 00:15
chunjuwu wrote:
It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars early in its history and that some were carried to Earth by a meteorite. However, strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time, and no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets. So, even if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out.

The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?

(A) It fails to establish whether bacteria actually developed on Mars
(B) it fails to establish how likely it is that Martian bacteria were transported to Earth
(C) It fails to consider whether there were means other than meteorites by which Martian bacteria could have been carried to Earth.
(D) It fails to consider whether all bacteria now on Earth could have arisen from transported Martian bacteria.
(E) It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out.

Note: There are two questions available with the similar stimulus and same first line but different question. The other question (complete the passage) is discussed in: it-is-theoretically-possible-that-bacteria-developed-on-q2-46449.html


Whats wrong with D and E...

Can someone explain...?
_________________

MODULUS Concept ---> http://gmatclub.com/forum/inequalities-158054.html#p1257636
HEXAGON Theory ---> http://gmatclub.com/forum/hexagon-theory-tips-to-solve-any-heaxgon-question-158189.html#p1258308

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 41

1 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1124

Kudos [?]: 3557 [1], given: 123

Location: United States
Premium Member
Re: It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on - Q1 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jul 2013, 01:07
1
This post received
KUDOS
jaituteja wrote:
chunjuwu wrote:
It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars early in its history and that some were carried to Earth by a meteorite. However, strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time, and no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets. So, even if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out.

The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?

(A) It fails to establish whether bacteria actually developed on Mars
(B) it fails to establish how likely it is that Martian bacteria were transported to Earth
(C) It fails to consider whether there were means other than meteorites by which Martian bacteria could have been carried to Earth.
(D) It fails to consider whether all bacteria now on Earth could have arisen from transported Martian bacteria.
(E) It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out.

Note: There are two questions available with the similar stimulus and same first line but different question. The other question (complete the passage) is discussed in: it-is-theoretically-possible-that-bacteria-developed-on-q2-46449.html


Whats wrong with D and E...

Can someone explain...?


Hi jaituteja

I'm glad to help.

ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:

Fact: strains of bacteria from different planets  have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time.
Fact: NO two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets
Conclusion: if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out.

Assumption: There is NOT ANY CASE that all bacterial strains on Earth came from Mars. Because if All bacterial on Earth originated from Mars ==> we CANNOT compare bacteria from Mars with bacteria on Earth to make conclusion, because they are the same.

D and E, which one is correct?

(D) It fails to consider whether all bacteria now on Earth could have arisen from transported Martian bacteria.
Correct. It attacks the conclusion by demonstrating the case that all bacterial strains on Earth actually traveled to Earth from Mars. we CANNOT compare bacteria from Mars with bacteria on Earth, because they are the same.

(E) It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out.
Wrong. E does not weaken the point “all bacteria arrived on Earth from Mars must have died out” at all. Don’t go too FAR. You CANNOT assume that “strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out” = all bacteria living on Earth arrived from Mars. Because there would be the case that some bacteria originated form Earth died out later, but others still alive. Therefore, the conclusion based on the comparison MAY BE valid ==> You cannot weaken the conclusion by using E. That's why E differs from D.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Kudos [?]: 3557 [1], given: 123

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 412

Kudos [?]: 345 [0], given: 34

Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
Re: It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on - Q1 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jan 2014, 08:59
jaituteja wrote:
chunjuwu wrote:
It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars early in its history and that some were carried to Earth by a meteorite. However, strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time, and no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets. So, even if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out.

The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?

(A) It fails to establish whether bacteria actually developed on Mars
(B) it fails to establish how likely it is that Martian bacteria were transported to Earth
(C) It fails to consider whether there were means other than meteorites by which Martian bacteria could have been carried to Earth.
(D) It fails to consider whether all bacteria now on Earth could have arisen from transported Martian bacteria.
(E) It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out.

Note: There are two questions available with the similar stimulus and same first line but different question. The other question (complete the passage) is discussed in: it-is-theoretically-possible-that-bacteria-developed-on-q2-46449.html


Whats wrong with D and E...

Can someone explain...?
This is one of the most twister questions I have seen on GMAT. But not because of logic but sentence construction. I would have been scratching for long in understanding the meaning. Lets deconstruct.

Fact 1: It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars early in its history and that some were carried to Earth by a meteorite.

Fact 2: However, strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time, and
Not of much significance

Fact3: no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets.
It looked like an SC question to me for first 20 times I looked at it. But, guess GMAT is all about persistence
Let us first remove this "no" from beginning to understand the meaning: "two bacterial strains on Earth are different"
Now place "not" after "are": "two bacterial strains on Earth are not different"

So, this sentence basically says that bacterial strains on earth are so same that they must be of only one origin.

Conclusion: So, even if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out.
Bacteria from Mars, if on earth, must have died out.

Summary: We can have only one source for all bacteria on earth. So all bacteria from Mars, if reached earth, would have died out on earth.

What will weaken this? Bacteria from Mars didn't die.
D says exactly that.

E says that earth bacteria died out. It is extra information but doesnt deal with Martian bacteria(which is part of conclusion)

Correct me if this line of thinking looks wrong..
_________________

If you know what you're worth, then go out and get what you're worth. But you gotta be willing to take the hits, and not pointing fingers saying you ain't where you wanna be because of anybody! Cowards do that and You're better than that!
The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short; the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.
Failure establishes only this, that our determination to succeed was not strong enough.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.

http://gmatclub.com/forum/1000-sc-notes-at-one-place-in-one-document-with-best-of-explanations-192961.html

Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip.

Kudos [?]: 345 [0], given: 34

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10134

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on - Q1 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Apr 2015, 04:40
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Dec 2013
Posts: 50

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 38

Location: United States
GPA: 3.7
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on - Q1 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jul 2015, 01:30
chunjuwu wrote:
It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars early in its history and that some were carried to Earth by a meteorite. However, strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time, and no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets. So, even if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out.

The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?

(A) It fails to establish whether bacteria actually developed on Mars
(B) it fails to establish how likely it is that Martian bacteria were transported to Earth
(C) It fails to consider whether there were means other than meteorites by which Martian bacteria could have been carried to Earth.
(D) It fails to consider whether all bacteria now on Earth could have arisen from transported Martian bacteria.
(E) It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out.

Note: There are two questions available with the similar stimulus and same first line but different question. The other question (complete the passage) is discussed in: it-is-theoretically-possible-that-bacteria-developed-on-q2-46449.html


B/w D and E, its D.

In option E, there is no point that involves Martian bacteria, as the argument is talking about it in detail and it is expected to somehow be presented in the ans.

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 38

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10134

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on - Q1 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jul 2016, 10:09
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2014
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on - Q1 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Oct 2017, 02:11
can anybody know which standard flaw it is ,I mean name of the flaw in general . As per me I think it irrelevant premise flaw,but I am not sure about it .

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Board of Directors
User avatar
D
Status: Aiming MBA
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 2778

Kudos [?]: 920 [0], given: 67

Location: India
GPA: 3.65
WE: Information Technology (Health Care)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on - Q1 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Oct 2017, 02:32
rrnjn145 wrote:
can anybody know which standard flaw it is ,I mean name of the flaw in general . As per me I think it irrelevant premise flaw,but I am not sure about it .


Hi rrnjn145 ,

Premises are NEVER irrelevant.

As far as this question is concerned, we can say the argument is missing a broader scope. i.e. It is missing a possibility that could weaken the conclusion.

Does that make sense?
_________________

How I improved from V21 to V40! ?

Kudos [?]: 920 [0], given: 67

Expert Post
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
B
Joined: 20 Nov 2016
Posts: 189

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 48

CAT Tests
Re: It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on - Q1 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Oct 2017, 14:13
abhimahna wrote:
rrnjn145 wrote:
can anybody know which standard flaw it is ,I mean name of the flaw in general . As per me I think it irrelevant premise flaw,but I am not sure about it .


Hi rrnjn145 ,

Premises are NEVER irrelevant.

As far as this question is concerned, we can say the argument is missing a broader scope. i.e. It is missing a possibility that could weaken the conclusion.

Does that make sense?


Thanks abhimahna for the response! The following post might also help: https://gmatclub.com/forum/it-is-theore ... l#p1241908
_________________

www.gmatninja.com

Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 48

Re: It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on - Q1   [#permalink] 19 Oct 2017, 14:13

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 32 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on - Q1

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.