Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack
GMAT Club

 It is currently 26 Mar 2017, 12:17

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# It is widely assumed that a museum is helped financially

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 18 Sep 2011
Posts: 13
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 64 [5] , given: 5

It is widely assumed that a museum is helped financially [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2012, 05:02
5
KUDOS
7
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

41% (02:32) correct 59% (01:23) wrong based on 377 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

It is widely assumed that a museum is helped financially when a generous patron donates a potential exhibit. In truth, however, donated objects require storage space, which is not free, and routine conservation, which is rather expensive. Therefore, such gifts exacerbate rather than lighten the demands made on a museum’s financial resources.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

(A) To keep patrons well disposed, a museum will find it advisable to put at least some donated objects on exhibit rather than merely in storage.
(B) The people who are most likely to donate valuable objects to a museum are also the people who are most likely to make cash gifts to it.
(C) A museum cannot save money by resorting to cheap storage under less than adequate conditions, because so doing would drive up the cost of conservation.
(D) Patrons expect a museum to keep donated objects in its possession rather than to raise cash by selling them.
(E) Objects donated by a patron to a museum are often of such importance that the museum would be obliged to add them to its collection through purchase if necessary.

Need some help in reasoning option (B)

Many thanks!
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Status: Bunuel's fan!
Joined: 08 Jul 2011
Posts: 239
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 55

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2012, 07:02
I found a similar post here

it-is-widely-assumed-that-a-museum-is-helped-financially-69739.html

E is a stronger weakener than B.
BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 906
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 74

Kudos [?]: 636 [1] , given: 44

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2012, 21:14
1
KUDOS
(E) Objects donated by a patron to a museum are often of such importance that the museum would be obliged to add them to its collection through purchase if necessary.

=> choice E shows that if lack of the objects donated by a patron to a museum. The collection of museum's exhibit will meaningless and will not have value. So, this is the weakened answer.
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 306
Followers: 539

Kudos [?]: 1024 [6] , given: 2

### Show Tags

06 Jun 2012, 16:56
6
KUDOS
Expert's post
The argument states that donated pieces cost museum money. To weaken this conclusion, we could find an answer choice that suggests that a donated piece may actually fetch a lot of money, money that will more than help defray the cost of storage, etc. Or we could find another answer that says that the donated gifts somehow end up saving museums money.

Answer (B) doesn't quite do the trick. Had (B) said, 'Wealthy patrons who donate objects will retract their handsome cash offerings if museums no longer accept donated objects', we would have a winner. But, as the way it is, there is nothing in (B) to suggest that the donated objects are somehow saving the museums money.

(E) is on the money, so to speak, because it gives us a good reason why donated objects will actually save museums money: museums do not have to spend money on expensive artwork because they already have artwork in the form of donated objects.

Hope that helps
_________________

Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep

Director
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 853
Followers: 89

Kudos [?]: 255 [0], given: 61

### Show Tags

06 Jun 2012, 17:05
got it "e " @original poster: wud appreciate if u cud hide ur doubts in black (irrespective of choice ).this wud help to make unbiased decisions
Intern
Joined: 10 May 2013
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2013, 22:41
ChrisLele wrote:
The argument states that donated pieces cost museum money. To weaken this conclusion, we could find an answer choice that suggests that a donated piece may actually fetch a lot of money, money that will more than help defray the cost of storage, etc. Or we could find another answer that says that the donated gifts somehow end up saving museums money.

Answer (B) doesn't quite do the trick. Had (B) said, 'Wealthy patrons who donate objects will retract their handsome cash offerings if museums no longer accept donated objects', we would have a winner. But, as the way it is, there is nothing in (B) to suggest that the donated objects are somehow saving the museums money.

(E) is on the money, so to speak, because it gives us a good reason why donated objects will actually save museums money: museums do not have to spend money on expensive artwork because they already have artwork in the form of donated objects.

Hope that helps

Hi Chris!
Where is it mention in option E that the donated object will attract more visitors and hence lighten the financial liabilities of the museum even if it has to be purchased ??
Manager
Joined: 22 Apr 2013
Posts: 88
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 31 [1] , given: 95

Re: It is widely assumed that a museum is helped financially [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2013, 23:49
1
KUDOS
supratim7 wrote:
It is widely assumed that a museum is helped financially when a generous patron donates a potential exhibit. In truth, however, donated objects require storage space, which is not free, and routine conservation, which is rather expensive. Therefore, such gifts exacerbate rather than lighten the demands made on a museum’s financial resources.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

(A) To keep patrons well disposed, a museum will find it advisable to put at least some donated objects on exhibit rather than merely in storage. In storage or on display, space still costs money. Being on display still requires conservation.
(B) The people who are most likely to donate valuable objects to a museum are also the people who are most likely to make cash gifts to it. Nothing about this states that the cash gifts offset the costs mentioned.
(C) A museum cannot save money by resorting to cheap storage under less than adequate conditions, because so doing would drive up the cost of conservation. Straight out strengthens the argument made.
(D) Patrons expect a museum to keep donated objects in its possession rather than to raise cash by selling them. Which means the museum has no choice but to assume the costs mentioned.
(E) Objects donated by a patron to a museum are often of such importance that the museum would be obliged to add them to its collection through purchase if necessary. Cost of Acquisition + Cost of Storage/Conservation = What Museum would have to spend to acquire important objects. These are expenses the museum would take on if the object were to come on to the open market. Every object a museum owns has the expenses mentioned in the question. In this case a donation saves the museum the acquisition cost of something they would acquire (or try to) anyway.

Need some help in reasoning option (B)

Many thanks!

I'll admit I had a bit of a tough time between B and E. The fact that the cash donations mentioned in B might not counter the expenses of the donation, led me to E.
_________________

I do not beg for kudos.

Manager
Joined: 22 Apr 2013
Posts: 88
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 95

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2013, 00:09
sparkling12 wrote:
ChrisLele wrote:
The argument states that donated pieces cost museum money. To weaken this conclusion, we could find an answer choice that suggests that a donated piece may actually fetch a lot of money, money that will more than help defray the cost of storage, etc. Or we could find another answer that says that the donated gifts somehow end up saving museums money.

Answer (B) doesn't quite do the trick. Had (B) said, 'Wealthy patrons who donate objects will retract their handsome cash offerings if museums no longer accept donated objects', we would have a winner. But, as the way it is, there is nothing in (B) to suggest that the donated objects are somehow saving the museums money.

(E) is on the money, so to speak, because it gives us a good reason why donated objects will actually save museums money: museums do not have to spend money on expensive artwork because they already have artwork in the form of donated objects.

Hope that helps

Hi Chris!
Where is it mention in option E that the donated object will attract more visitors and hence lighten the financial liabilities of the museum even if it has to be purchased ??

In my opinion attracting visitors is immaterial to the question stem. You are assuming that all museums charge admission fees to visitors.
_________________

I do not beg for kudos.

Intern
Joined: 10 May 2013
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2013, 01:57
MzJavert wrote:
sparkling12 wrote:
ChrisLele wrote:
The argument states that donated pieces cost museum money. To weaken this conclusion, we could find an answer choice that suggests that a donated piece may actually fetch a lot of money, money that will more than help defray the cost of storage, etc. Or we could find another answer that says that the donated gifts somehow end up saving museums money.

Answer (B) doesn't quite do the trick. Had (B) said, 'Wealthy patrons who donate objects will retract their handsome cash offerings if museums no longer accept donated objects', we would have a winner. But, as the way it is, there is nothing in (B) to suggest that the donated objects are somehow saving the museums money.

(E) is on the money, so to speak, because it gives us a good reason why donated objects will actually save museums money: museums do not have to spend money on expensive artwork because they already have artwork in the form of donated objects.

Hope that helps

Hi Chris!
Where is it mention in option E that the donated object will attract more visitors and hence lighten the financial liabilities of the museum even if it has to be purchased ??

In my opinion attracting visitors is immaterial to the question stem. You are assuming that all museums charge admission fees to visitors.

Well if this is not the case, then how adding a new object into museum would not be a exacerbation on a museum’s financial resources. It's true that donation would ease out purchase cost but still it involves maintenance cost, which is an additional burden on its financial resources.
correct me where am I wrong
Manager
Joined: 22 Apr 2013
Posts: 88
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 31 [1] , given: 95

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2013, 15:36
1
KUDOS
sparkling12 wrote:
MzJavert wrote:

In my opinion attracting visitors is immaterial to the question stem. You are assuming that all museums charge admission fees to visitors.

Well if this is not the case, then how adding a new object into museum would not be a exacerbation on a museum’s financial resources. It's true that donation would ease out purchase cost but still it involves maintenance cost, which is an additional burden on its financial resources.
correct me where am I wrong

Let's make this more general. Item A's contribution to the organization's mission is high. Resources devoted to item A directly help accomplish the organization's mission. Item B requires the same amount of resources. But because item B contributes very little to the organization's mission, resources devoted to item B are wasted.
_________________

I do not beg for kudos.

Intern
Joined: 25 Jul 2012
Posts: 9
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [2] , given: 10

Re: It is widely assumed that a museum is helped financially [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2013, 17:47
2
KUDOS
It is widely assumed that a museum is helped financially when a generous patron donates a potential exhibit. In truth, however, donated objects require storage space, which is not free, and routine conservation, which is rather expensive. Therefore, such gifts exacerbate rather than lighten the demands made on a museum’s financial resources.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

(A) To keep patrons well disposed, a museum will find it advisable to put at least some donated objects on exhibit rather than merely in storage.
(B) The people who are most likely to donate valuable objects to a museum are also the people who are most likely to make cash gifts to it. - It might or might not help as the cash gifts might or might not cover the additional storage costs which mentioned in the argument
(C) A museum cannot save money by resorting to cheap storage under less than adequate conditions, because so doing would drive up the cost of conservation.
(D) Patrons expect a museum to keep donated objects in its possession rather than to raise cash by selling them.
(E) Objects donated by a patron to a museum are often of such importance that the museum would be obliged to add them to its collection through purchase if necessary. - This is definitely going to help the museum as they don't have to spend on buying these objects

Hope it helps!
Current Student
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Posts: 299
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 680 Q48 V34
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 140 [0], given: 242

Re: It is widely assumed that a museum is helped financially [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Sep 2013, 05:54
supratim7 wrote:
It is widely assumed that a museum is helped financially when a generous patron donates a potential exhibit. In truth, however, donated objects require storage space, which is not free, and routine conservation, which is rather expensive. Therefore, such gifts exacerbate rather than lighten the demands made on a museum’s financial resources.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

(A) To keep patrons well disposed, a museum will find it advisable to put at least some donated objects on exhibit rather than merely in storage.
(B) The people who are most likely to donate valuable objects to a museum are also the people who are most likely to make cash gifts to it.
(C) A museum cannot save money by resorting to cheap storage under less than adequate conditions, because so doing would drive up the cost of conservation.
(D) Patrons expect a museum to keep donated objects in its possession rather than to raise cash by selling them.
(E) Objects donated by a patron to a museum are often of such importance that the museum would be obliged to add them to its collection through purchase if necessary.

Need some help in reasoning option (B)

Many thanks!

Next time please put your chosen option also under a spoiler. I saw that sentence and straightway marked E.
Intern
Joined: 05 Feb 2014
Posts: 24
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 25

Re: It is widely assumed that a museum is helped financially [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jun 2014, 01:15
ChrisLele wrote:
The argument states that donated pieces cost museum money. To weaken this conclusion, we could find an answer choice that suggests that a donated piece may actually fetch a lot of money, money that will more than help defray the cost of storage, etc. Or we could find another answer that says that the donated gifts somehow end up saving museums money.

Answer (B) doesn't quite do the trick. Had (B) said, 'Wealthy patrons who donate objects will retract their handsome cash offerings if museums no longer accept donated objects', we would have a winner. But, as the way it is, there is nothing in (B) to suggest that the donated objects are somehow saving the museums money.

(E) is on the money, so to speak, because it gives us a good reason why donated objects will actually save museums money: museums do not have to spend money on expensive artwork because they already have artwork in the form of donated objects.

Hope that helps

Hi Chris,

I have a doubt regarding your reasoning for option B. Could you please let us know the reasoning you used, to say that the customized option B would actually weaken the argument, i.e., 'Wealthy patrons who donate objects will retract their handsome cash offerings if museums no longer accept donated objects'.

I can't see how the above would affect the conclusion in any way.

Many Thanks.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10675
Followers: 957

Kudos [?]: 214 [0], given: 0

Re: It is widely assumed that a museum is helped financially [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 May 2016, 01:38
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: It is widely assumed that a museum is helped financially   [#permalink] 09 May 2016, 01:38
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Scientists are sometimes said to assume that something is 9 28 Oct 2009, 00:58
2 It is widely assumed that a museum is helped financially 8 03 Sep 2008, 20:24
CR Museum 4 20 Aug 2008, 10:55
Scientists are sometimes said to assume that something is 6 16 Apr 2008, 11:53
Source: GMAT plus Section 11 #19 It is widely assumed that a 8 19 Jul 2007, 00:04
Display posts from previous: Sort by