It is currently 22 Oct 2017, 23:38

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Jim: A new company specializing in home exercise equipment

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 10 Apr 2011
Posts: 39

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 7

Jim: A new company specializing in home exercise equipment [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 May 2011, 12:01
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

79% (01:38) correct 21% (02:26) wrong based on 197 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Jim: A new company specializing in home exercise equipment is charging up to \$2,500 for fancy treadmills featuring built-in entertainment systems and heart monitors. The marketing materials for these expensive machines claim that, with regular use, they can help people lose weight, eliminate stress and reduce the risk of heart disease. However, there is no indication that running on even the most advanced treadmill offers any health benefits that running on a track does not. Save your money. If you want to become more fit, go jogging outside.

Which of the following, if true, most calls into question Jim's argument?

A. Most people are more inclined to exercise on a state-of-the-art treadmill because it is more convenient and enjoyable than running outside.
B. Running on a treadmill can be less beneficial than running outside, which requires the use of a broader range of muscles to maintain pace and balance.
C. To most people who would be interested in buying a treadmill for their homes, \$2,500 is not a major expense.
D. Jim was a member of a panel that conducted extensive evaluations of all of the leading treadmills currently on the market.
E. Studies show that devices that use electrical currents to simulate exertion are considerably less effective than traditional forms of exercise, such as push-ups and weightlifting, in promoting the development of muscle mass.

For choice C, since most people who are interested in buying a treadmill for their homes, and they don't think money is a major expense. This actually weakens the conclusion"Save your money." Even though it doesn't really mention about the money value in the argument, but it also weakens the conclusion. Why C is not the answer? Also, what if there is no answer A, then would C most likely can be true for this question?

Thanks,
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Yvonne Hao

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 7

Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 257

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 9

Re: Home Exercise Equipment problem [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 May 2011, 14:06
C - You don't know anything about people who buy the machine. Argument is concluding that jog outside and you get same results. A gives a reason to say why running outside is not motivating and so weakens the conclusion of jog outside
_________________

If you like my post, consider giving me some KUDOS !!!!! Like you I need them

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 9

VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1285

Kudos [?]: 283 [0], given: 10

Re: Home Exercise Equipment problem [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 May 2011, 04:01
C is a classic trap answer changing the intent of the argument.
Intent of the argument is exercising outside vs exercising on treadmills.

A clearly works on this giving an outside reason too. Thats why A prevails.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Kudos [?]: 283 [0], given: 10

Manager
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 195

Kudos [?]: 237 [0], given: 78

Schools: ABCD
Jim: A new company specializing in home exercise equipment [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2012, 10:12
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Jim: A new company specializing in home exercise equipment is charging up to \$2,500 for fancy treadmills featuring built-in entertainment systems and heart monitors. The marketing materials for these expensive machines claim that, with regular use, they can help people lose weight, eliminate stress and reduce the risk of heart disease. However, there is no indication that running on even the most advanced treadmill offers any health benefits that running on a track does not. Save your money. If you want to become more fit, go jogging outside.

Which of the following, if true, most calls into question Jim's argument?

A. Most people are more inclined to exercise on a state-of-the-art treadmill because it is more convenient and enjoyable than running outside.
B. Running on a treadmill can be less beneficial than running outside, which requires the use of a broader range of muscles to maintain pace and balance.
C. To most people who would be interested in buying a treadmill for their homes, \$2,500 is not a major expense.
D. Jim was a member of a panel that conducted extensive evaluations of all of the leading treadmills currently on the market.
E. Studies show that devices that use electrical currents to simulate exertion are considerably less effective than traditional forms of exercise, such as push-ups and weightlifting, in promoting the development of muscle mass.

I have no doubts about A. Why is C incorrect?

Kudos [?]: 237 [0], given: 78

Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Jun 2010
Posts: 358

Kudos [?]: 453 [1], given: 50

Schools: IE'14, ISB'14, Kellogg'15
WE 1: 7 Yrs in Automobile (Commercial Vehicle industry)
Re: Jim: A new company specializing in home exercise equipment i [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2012, 10:37
1
KUDOS
voodoochild wrote:
Jim: A new company specializing in home exercise equipment is charging up to \$2,500 for fancy treadmills featuring built-in entertainment systems and heart monitors. The marketing materials for these expensive machines claim that, with regular use, they can help people lose weight, eliminate stress and reduce the risk of heart disease. However, there is no indication that running on even the most advanced treadmill offers any health benefits that running on a track does not. Save your money. If you want to become more fit, go jogging outside.

Which of the following, if true, most calls into question Jim's argument?

A. Most people are more inclined to exercise on a state-of-the-art treadmill because it is more convenient and enjoyable than running outside.
B. Running on a treadmill can be less beneficial than running outside, which requires the use of a broader range of muscles to maintain pace and balance.
C. To most people who would be interested in buying a treadmill for their homes, \$2,500 is not a major expense.
D. Jim was a member of a panel that conducted extensive evaluations of all of the leading treadmills currently on the market.
E. Studies show that devices that use electrical currents to simulate exertion are considerably less effective than traditional forms of exercise, such as push-ups and weightlifting, in promoting the development of muscle mass.

I have no doubts about A. Why is C incorrect?

Answer choice C actually has nothing to do with the argument. We are not concerned about the interest of buying a treadmill, rather interest of working-out in a treadmill. If most people buy a treadmill, then also we don't know are they going to use it or not. This answer choice actually shifts the scope of the argument.
_________________

Regards
SD
-----------------------------
Press Kudos if you like my post.
Debrief 610-540-580-710(Long Journey): http://gmatclub.com/forum/from-600-540-580-710-finally-achieved-in-4th-attempt-142456.html

Kudos [?]: 453 [1], given: 50

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7677

Kudos [?]: 17398 [1], given: 232

Location: Pune, India
Re: Jim: A new company specializing in home exercise equipment i [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2012, 21:09
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
voodoochild wrote:
Jim: A new company specializing in home exercise equipment is charging up to \$2,500 for fancy treadmills featuring built-in entertainment systems and heart monitors. The marketing materials for these expensive machines claim that, with regular use, they can help people lose weight, eliminate stress and reduce the risk of heart disease. However, there is no indication that running on even the most advanced treadmill offers any health benefits that running on a track does not. Save your money. If you want to become more fit, go jogging outside.

Which of the following, if true, most calls into question Jim's argument?

A. Most people are more inclined to exercise on a state-of-the-art treadmill because it is more convenient and enjoyable than running outside.
B. Running on a treadmill can be less beneficial than running outside, which requires the use of a broader range of muscles to maintain pace and balance.
C. To most people who would be interested in buying a treadmill for their homes, \$2,500 is not a major expense.
D. Jim was a member of a panel that conducted extensive evaluations of all of the leading treadmills currently on the market.
E. Studies show that devices that use electrical currents to simulate exertion are considerably less effective than traditional forms of exercise, such as push-ups and weightlifting, in promoting the development of muscle mass.

I have no doubts about A. Why is C incorrect?

Responding to a pm:

Does C weaken it? No. It doesn't matter whether \$2500 is a major expense or a minor expense. The point the author is making is that you should not spend this money since you get the same benefits from something which is free of cost. The fact that people considering buying a treadmill consider it a minor expense is no reason for them to actually buy the treadmill. You get the same benefits from something which is absolutely free. The correct option has to give you a reason why a treadmill is better than jogging outside and is hence worth some money.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 17398 [1], given: 232

Manager
Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 197

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 3

Re: Jim: A new company specializing in home exercise equipment i [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2012, 22:04
Cost has nothing to do with conclusion. Find the weakness from jogging outside and you have your answer.

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 3

Intern
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: Jim: A new company specializing in home exercise equipment [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jan 2013, 10:49
i think its B.
well it has nothing to do with costs but more of reason to do with the support a tread-mill gives in terms of heart rate monitoring, balance and less straining for muscles.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7677

Kudos [?]: 17398 [0], given: 232

Location: Pune, India
Re: Jim: A new company specializing in home exercise equipment [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jan 2013, 20:57
Gibran274 wrote:
i think its B.
well it has nothing to do with costs but more of reason to do with the support a tread-mill gives in terms of heart rate monitoring, balance and less straining for muscles.

The question asks you to weaken Jim's argument.

Jim says go jogging outside instead of using a treadmill. B says jogging outside is better. So we ended up strengthening Jim's argument with B.
(A) weakens the argument since it says that there are reasons why treadmill is better than jogging outside. Hence answer is (A)
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 17398 [0], given: 232

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10106

Kudos [?]: 264 [0], given: 0

Re: Jim: A new company specializing in home exercise equipment [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 May 2016, 05:43
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 264 [0], given: 0

Math Forum Moderator
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 3003

Kudos [?]: 1088 [0], given: 325

Location: India
GPA: 3.5
Re: Jim: A new company specializing in home exercise equipment [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 May 2016, 12:29
yvonne0923 wrote:
Jim: A new company specializing in home exercise equipment is charging up to \$2,500 for fancy treadmills featuring built-in entertainment systems and heart monitors. The marketing materials for these expensive machines claim that, with regular use, they can help people lose weight, eliminate stress and reduce the risk of heart disease. However, there is no indication that running on even the most advanced treadmill offers any health benefits that running on a track does not. Save your money. If you want to become more fit, go jogging outside.

Which of the following, if true, most calls into question Jim's argument?

A. Most people are more inclined to exercise on a state-of-the-art treadmill because it is more convenient and enjoyable than running outside.

C. To most people who would be interested in buying a treadmill for their homes, \$2,500 is not a major expense.

For choice C, since most people who are interested in buying a treadmill for their homes, and they don't think money is a major expense. This actually weakens the conclusion"Save your money." Even though it doesn't really mention about the money value in the argument, but it also weakens the conclusion. Why C is not the answer? Also, what if there is no answer A, then would C most likely can be true for this question?

Thanks,

Consider the stimulus as the MArketing campaign of 2 Companies :

M : The machine helps lose weight, eliminate stress and reduce the risk of heart disease.
J : Save your money. If you want to become more fit, go jogging outside. ( Do not buy the machine - go for jogging)

Jim's argument depends of the reason that since there is no use spending \$2,500 , when the benefits of running outside and treadmill are same.. The best way to weaken the argument is to show that there are some benefits/positive features which can be attributed to the machine which running on the track/jogging outside lacks.

Option (A) simply performs the aforesaid function , it brings out the advantage of running on treadmill as convenient and enjoyable compared to running outside.

_________________

Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )

Kudos [?]: 1088 [0], given: 325

Director
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 816

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 32

Re: Jim: A new company specializing in home exercise equipment [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jul 2017, 11:10
Merged topics. Please, search before posting questions!
_________________

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 32

Re: Jim: A new company specializing in home exercise equipment   [#permalink] 26 Jul 2017, 11:10
Display posts from previous: Sort by