Narenn wrote:
A Nice Question from VERITAS.
OA and OE will be posted after few responses. Brief and Correct explanations will be rewarded with a Kudo.
John and Karen begin running at opposite ends of a trail until they meet somewhere in between their starting points. They each run at their respective constant rates until John gets a cramp and stops. If Karen runs 50% faster than John, who is only able to cover 25% of the distance before he stops, what percent longer would Karen have run than she would have had John been able to maintain his constant rate until they met.
A) 25%
B) 50%
C) 75%
D) 100%
E) 200%
Happy Solving!
Given:
1. John and Karen begin running at opposite ends of a trail until they meet somewhere in between their starting points.
2. They each run at their respective constant rates until John gets a cramp and stops.
Asked: If Karen runs 50% faster than John, who is only able to cover 25% of the distance before he stops, what percent longer would Karen have run than she would have had John been able to maintain his constant rate until they met.
vK / vJ = 1.5
Let the speeds of John and Karen be 2x & 3x mph respectively
Let the length of the trail be L miles
Normal Case:
Distance = L miles
Relative speed = 2x + 3x = 5x mph
Time taken to meet = L/5x= .2L/x hours
Abnormal Case : John is only able to cover 25% of the distance before he stops
Time when both were running = (L/4)/5x = L/20x hours
Distance covered by both in L/20x hours = L/20x * (2x + 3x) = L/4
Remaining distance = 3L/4
Time taken by Karen to cover 3L/4 distance = 3L/4 /(3x) = L/4x
Total time run by Karen = L/20x + L/4x = 6L/20x = 3L/10x = .3L/x
Extra time run by Karen = .3L/x - .2L/x = .1L/x
Percent longer would Karen have run ={ (.1L/x)/(.2L/x)}*100% = 50%
IMO B
BunuelI think OA should be B
Please check whether OA is correct.
Yes I thought the answer would be 50% too. Assuming the total distance to be 180km, in the normal scenario, Karen would have traveled 108km while John would have traveled 72km when they would have met. So I assumed that John had traveled only 25% of his estimated distance and not the overall. This would've led to Karen having to travel an additional 54km, thereby leading to a 50% increase in time.