It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 12:37

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

CEO
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3584

Kudos [?]: 4590 [0], given: 360

Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Dec 2007, 23:41
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

89% (00:32) correct 11% (01:12) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

463. Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to defendants so they can attempt to rebut the testimony, but the Constitution explicitly requires only that the defendant have the opportunity to confront an accuser in court.

(A) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to defendants so they can attempt to rebut
(B) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses be made known to defendants so that they can attempt to rebut
(C) that the defendants should know the identities of all prosecution witnesses so they can attempt a rebuttal of
(D) the identities of all prosecution witnesses should be made known to defendants so they can attempt rebutting
(E) making known to defendants the identities of all prosecution witnesses so that they can attempt to rebut

Kudos [?]: 4590 [0], given: 360

Intern
Joined: 13 Nov 2007
Posts: 19

Kudos [?]: 4 [1], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Dec 2007, 05:34
1
KUDOS
walker wrote:
463. Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to defendants so they can attempt to rebut the testimony, but the Constitution explicitly requires only that the defendant have the opportunity to confront an accuser in court.

(A) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to defendants so they can attempt to rebut
(B) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses be made known to defendants so that they can attempt to rebut
(C) that the defendants should know the identities of all prosecution witnesses so they can attempt a rebuttal of
(D) the identities of all prosecution witnesses should be made known to defendants so they can attempt rebutting
(E) making known to defendants the identities of all prosecution witnesses so that they can attempt to rebut

This is a type of sentence where one person or body expects/desires/orders/requests/etc. to do something and the correct form of the sentence is then THAT+Infinitive form of the verb without TO.
E.g. In the option B, it's actually *TO BE made known* but it is expected that you know it.

C/D is not correct since *should* indicates only moral obligation and court of law cannot impose a moral obligation.

E ...they is not clear. also *THAT* is missing

A i just can't explain why A is wrong but i know that it is wrong.

If you have Manhattan SC guide, please refer to Page 49.

Kudos [?]: 4 [1], given: 0

Director
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 628

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Dec 2007, 09:51
walker wrote:
463. Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to defendants so they can attempt to rebut the testimony, but the Constitution explicitly requires only that the defendant have the opportunity to confront an accuser in court.

(A) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to defendants so they can attempt to rebut
(B) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses be made known to defendants so that they can attempt to rebut
(C) that the defendants should know the identities of all prosecution witnesses so they can attempt a rebuttal of
(D) the identities of all prosecution witnesses should be made known to defendants so they can attempt rebutting
(E) making known to defendants the identities of all prosecution witnesses so that they can attempt to rebut

This is a type of sentence where one person or body expects/desires/orders/requests/etc. to do something and the correct form of the sentence is then THAT+Infinitive form of the verb without TO.
E.g. In the option B, it's actually *TO BE made known* but it is expected that you know it.

C/D is not correct since *should* indicates only moral obligation and court of law cannot impose a moral obligation.

E ...they is not clear. also *THAT* is missing

A i just can't explain why A is wrong but i know that it is wrong.

If you have Manhattan SC guide, please refer to Page 49.

I think this is the reason why 'A' is wrong...

be - present subjunctive
are - second person singular / plural ; first & third person plural present indicative

require that - needs a subjunctive (contingent or hypothetical action)

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3584

Kudos [?]: 4590 [0], given: 360

Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40

### Show Tags

30 Dec 2007, 14:21
Thanks again!

(OA is B)

Kudos [?]: 4590 [0], given: 360

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10110

Kudos [?]: 263 [0], given: 0

Re: Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jun 2014, 09:02
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 263 [0], given: 0

Re: Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of   [#permalink] 29 Jun 2014, 09:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by