It is currently 23 Sep 2017, 23:50

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Just a few years ago salmon could not survive in the oxygen

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 245

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 9

Just a few years ago salmon could not survive in the oxygen [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2011, 05:01
Just a few years ago salmon could not survive in the oxygen-starved and polluted Thames. Nor could many other species. But now, after years of determined effort, the salmon have returned, and that is a sure sign that the river is pollution-free.

Each of the following indicates a possible flaw in the reasoning in the passage above EXCEPT:

(A) The salmon that have returned may be of a strain that is unaffected by the pollutants.
(B) The pollution may have been reduced to a level at which the salmon can survive.
(C) Oxygen starvation is often a consequence of pollution, and this may have killed the salmon.
(D) The salmon may have been killed by one particular pollutant, which has now been removed while others remain.
(E) There may still be pollution, but its nature may have changed to a form that salmon can tolerate.

None of the answer choice made sense to me..pls help me understand the reasoning behind every answer...

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 9

Math Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 1970

Kudos [?]: 2010 [0], given: 376

Re: CR - Salmon [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2011, 06:22
DeeptiM wrote:
Just a few years ago salmon could not survive in the oxygen-starved and polluted Thames. Nor could many other species. But now, after years of determined effort, the salmon have returned, and that is a sure sign that the river is pollution-free.

Each of the following indicates a possible flaw in the reasoning in the passage above EXCEPT:

Argument: Pollution is removed completely; 100%

(A) The salmon that have returned may be of a strain that is unaffected by the pollutants.
Pollution exists; Salmon is of different type.

(B) The pollution may have been reduced to a level at which the salmon can survive.
Pollution NOT completely removed maybe 80% but NOT 100%.

(C) Oxygen starvation is often a consequence of pollution, and this may have killed the salmon.
This is giving us a cause why Salmons died; it is not telling us anything about the present state of the river, neither is it telling us about the salmons that returned.
In a way this fact strengthens the reasoning that now there is abundant oxygen because of 0 pollution and thus Salmon survive.

(D) The salmon may have been killed by one particular pollutant, which has now been removed while others remain.
Out of 100 pollutants; 1 killer pollutant gone and Salmons are back. This doesn't make river pollution free.

(E) There may still be pollution, but its nature may have changed to a form that salmon can tolerate.
Pollution still there but in a different form

None of the answer choice made sense to me..pls help me understand the reasoning behind every answer...

_________________

~fluke

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 2010 [0], given: 376

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Aug 2008
Posts: 220

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 5

Location: India
WE 1: 3.75 IT
WE 2: 1.0 IT
Re: CR - Salmon [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2011, 06:49
DeeptiM wrote:
Just a few years ago salmon could not survive in the oxygen-starved and polluted Thames. Nor could many other species. But now, after years of determined effort, the salmon have returned, and that is a sure sign that the river is pollution-free.

Each of the following indicates a possible flaw in the reasoning in the passage above EXCEPT:

Argument: River is Pollution Free.

(A) The salmon that have returned may be of a strain that is unaffected by the pollutants.
Pollution Still exists, so indicates a flaw.

(B) The pollution may have been reduced to a level at which the salmon can survive.
Pollution reduced but Still exists, so indicates a flaw.

(C) Oxygen starvation is often a consequence of pollution, and this may have killed the salmon.
Doesn't say anything w.r.t to Pollution presently in river. Hence not indication any flaw. Logical opposite!!

(D) The salmon may have been killed by one particular pollutant, which has now been removed while others remain.
One pollutant removed but Pollution Still exists, so indicates a flaw.

(E) There may still be pollution, but its nature may have changed to a form that salmon can tolerate.
Pollution Still exists in a different form, so indicates a flaw.

_________________

Cheers,
Varun


If you like my post, give me KUDOS!!

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 5

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Nov 2010
Posts: 203

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 7

Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Ross '15, Duke '15
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: CR - Salmon [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2011, 07:01
Clear C

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 7

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 245

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 9

Re: CR - Salmon [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2011, 07:46
OA is C...thanks guys!!

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 9

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 14 Feb 2010
Posts: 160

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 8

Location: Banaglore
Re: CR - Salmon [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2011, 10:55
+1 C

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 8

Director
Director
avatar
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 677

Kudos [?]: 193 [0], given: 37

Re: CR - Salmon [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2011, 19:33
C for me as well.

Crick

Kudos [?]: 193 [0], given: 37

Re: CR - Salmon   [#permalink] 19 Jul 2011, 19:33
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Just a few years ago salmon could not survive in the oxygen

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.