It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 05:22

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2005
Posts: 99

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Mar 2006, 11:21
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

50% (01:07) correct 50% (01:10) wrong based on 33 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

468. Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he also won the loyalty of its citizens: the invading Danes were well aware of this weakness and used it to their advantage in 893.
(A) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he a
(B) The fact that King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he had
(C) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he
(D) The fact that King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean that he
(E) Just because King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 27 Feb 2006
Posts: 621

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

09 Mar 2006, 12:41
^ C ^

At first i thought that "the fact that" would be the correct usage but in B "had occupied" is wrong. In D there is "it" after the comma and it is redundant.

In A the subject is missing.

In E " had occupied" is wrong.

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1115

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

Location: India

Show Tags

09 Mar 2006, 20:49
I'll go for B.
I think starting sentence with ' The Fact ' sounds more apt than using
' Just because '.
That leaves B and D. D is wrong for the reason given by selene.

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2005
Posts: 99

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

10 Mar 2006, 10:28
OA is B.

Does this mean that "just because" is not idiomatic????

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 17 Sep 2005
Posts: 901

Kudos [?]: 118 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

11 Mar 2006, 05:46
May be 'Just because' is not idiomatic. B looks better.
I also believe that 'had' is not wrong in B.
If we convert this sentence in present tense then we say:

The fact that King Alfred has occupied and fortified London does not mean that he has won the loyalty of its citizens.

Similary, In the past tense:

The fact that King Alfred had occupied and fortified London did not mean that he had won the loyalty of its citizens.

Kudos [?]: 118 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 220

Kudos [?]: 105 [1], given: 38

Re: SC - King Alfred [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 May 2010, 21:15
1
KUDOS
"Just because" and "just like" are not idiomatic.

"Just as... so..." is idiomatic.

Kudos [?]: 105 [1], given: 38

Manager
Joined: 14 Feb 2011
Posts: 68

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 2

Re: SC - King Alfred [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Sep 2011, 14:14
Why we use Past perfect? There is no need to indicate that one event occurred before another.
Actually B looks better (the fact .... did not mean), but I excluded it because of wrong (as I thought) tense.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Posts: 128

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 5

Location: United States
Re: SC - King Alfred [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Dec 2011, 04:13
alexpiers wrote:
Why we use Past perfect? There is no need to indicate that one event occurred before another.
Actually B looks better (the fact .... did not mean), but I excluded it because of wrong (as I thought) tense.

Exactly!
But, among all the options, B was better.
I certainly agree that the use of past perfect was not necessary.(Especially, when there are explicit details of years in the statement)
Thanks!

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 5

Intern
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
Posts: 22

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 56

Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT Date: 01-31-2012
Re: Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Jan 2012, 09:57
Imo is b
1.- we should use had occupied, since one event ocurred before another. Then we only have choices b and e.
2.- choice E in incorrect, as there is no clear subject before the coma.

Posted from GMAT ToolKit

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 56

Intern
Joined: 14 Oct 2005
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 3

Re: Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Jan 2012, 10:22
not sure..went with C, but B looks better..

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 3

Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2011
Posts: 141

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 15

Re: Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Jan 2012, 10:51
Its B. also

for the following three choices
(C) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he
(D) The fact that King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean that he
(E) Just because King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he

where is the antecedent for "it"?

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 15

Intern
Joined: 23 Nov 2011
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 2

Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Schools: McDonough '15
Re: Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Jan 2012, 10:52
Actually past participle looks rational since there is a second part of the sentence.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 2

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10145

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Jun 2014, 09:28
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 18 Sep 2016
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 2

Re: Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in [#permalink]

Show Tags

10 Oct 2016, 01:49

A: Plainly wrong. Doesn't make any sense.

C,D,E have 'it' which is ambiguous and should be eliminated.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 2

Re: Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in   [#permalink] 10 Oct 2016, 01:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by