It is currently 13 Dec 2017, 22:18

# Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Ross R1 | Kellogg R1 | Darden R1 | Tepper R1

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in

Author Message
SVP
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1790

Kudos [?]: 1102 [0], given: 5

Location: New York
Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Feb 2009, 20:32
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

33% (00:00) correct 67% (00:00) wrong based on 8 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he also won the loyalty of its citizens: the invading Danes were well aware of this weakness and used it to their advantage in 893.
(A) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he
(B) The fact that King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he had
(C) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he
(D) The fact that King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean that he
(E) Just because King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he
_________________

Smiling wins more friends than frowning

Kudos [?]: 1102 [0], given: 5

SVP
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1790

Kudos [?]: 1102 [0], given: 5

Location: New York

### Show Tags

06 Feb 2009, 20:45
bigtreezl wrote:
A

Explanation preferred.!!!!
_________________

Smiling wins more friends than frowning

Kudos [?]: 1102 [0], given: 5

Director
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 800

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Feb 2009, 20:52
x2suresh wrote:
bigtreezl wrote:
A

Explanation preferred.!!!!

you need "just because" to show contrast and "been" for past tense

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Posts: 171

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Feb 2009, 22:07
Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he also won the loyalty of its citizens: the invading Danes were well aware of this weakness and used it to their advantage in 893.
(A) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he
(B) The fact that King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he had
(C) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he
(D) The fact that King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean that he
(E) Just because King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he

Choose B

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 May 2008
Posts: 426

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 4

Schools: Kellogg Class of 2012

### Show Tags

07 Feb 2009, 09:42
I'll go with B

C,D and E are out because of the use of 'it'

I think we need 'had' to convey the earlier past action. So, describing something happened in 886 will require 'had'(earlier past). It is only after this, that Danes 'used'( later past) it to their advantage in 893.

Cheers,
Unplugged

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 4

SVP
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1790

Kudos [?]: 1102 [0], given: 5

Location: New York

### Show Tags

07 Feb 2009, 09:54
ConkergMat wrote:
Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he also won the loyalty of its citizens: the invading Danes were well aware of this weakness and used it to their advantage in 893.
(A) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he
(B) The fact that King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he had
(C) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he
(D) The fact that King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean that he
(E) Just because King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he

Choose B

Can you elaborate why "Just because" is wrong?
_________________

Smiling wins more friends than frowning

Kudos [?]: 1102 [0], given: 5

Director
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 727

Kudos [?]: 881 [0], given: 99

### Show Tags

07 Feb 2009, 10:08
IMO E.

past perfect and past tense?

Kudos [?]: 881 [0], given: 99

Manager
Joined: 28 Apr 2011
Posts: 177

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 6

Re: Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2012, 20:36
IMO B as two things happened at 2 different time are to be explained

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 6

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Apr 2011
Posts: 274

Kudos [?]: 391 [0], given: 51

Schools: Booth,NUS,St.Gallon
Re: Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2012, 07:40
I will go with A.We need not explicitly use the past perfect tense as used in B.Its already understood because of the mention of the date .anyways please post the OA .
_________________

+1 if you like my explanation .Thanks

Kudos [?]: 391 [0], given: 51

Intern
Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Posts: 26

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Re: Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2012, 08:48
B for sure..we need a past perfect...OA plz

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Re: Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in   [#permalink] 05 Apr 2012, 08:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.