It is currently 13 Dec 2017, 01:27

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 08 Apr 2008
Posts: 38

Kudos [?]: 145 [1], given: 1

Location: India
Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Sep 2009, 08:51
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

38% (01:10) correct 63% (01:05) wrong based on 87 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

30. Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he also won the loyalty of its citizens: the invading Danes were well aware of this weakness and used it to their advantage in 893.
(A) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he
(B) The fact that King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he had
(C) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he
(D) The fact that King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean that he
(E) Just because King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he

Kudos [?]: 145 [1], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 12 Aug 2009
Posts: 102

Kudos [?]: 15 [1], given: 2

### Show Tags

06 Sep 2009, 20:06
1
KUDOS
'does second had in 'B' required?

because occupied and fortified occured before King had the chance to win the support of the people. Are these being considred concurrent? If concurrent then had is not required the simple past tense would do the work?

in C, D and E -> it seems not have antecedent or refering to fact in D (which is wrong?).

Can anyone explain in details?

picking 'A'

Kudos [?]: 15 [1], given: 2

Intern
Joined: 07 Jun 2010
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2010, 18:59
I rejected A since with just because you cannot have did not. you should have does not.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2009
Posts: 141

Kudos [?]: 124 [1], given: 5

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2010, 09:25
1
KUDOS
B is correct.. proper tense and construction, no use of ambiguous 'it" and "Just because"

Kudos [?]: 124 [1], given: 5

VP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1469

Kudos [?]: 805 [1], given: 6

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2010, 14:54
1
KUDOS
B it is.

The below explanation might help.

Quote:

The fact that King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he had also won the loyalty of its citizens: the invading Danes were well aware of this weakness and used it to their advantage in 893.

Sequence of events:

886: King Alfred occupies and fortifies London and potentially wins the loyalty of citizens

Since 893 is in the simple past (Danes WERE), both events of 886, which is prior to 893, should be in the past perfect (HAD occupied, HAD won).

Kudos [?]: 805 [1], given: 6

Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2010
Posts: 124

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 47

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2010, 15:00
I remember this question from MGMAT I missed it:))

B

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 47

Director
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 672

Kudos [?]: 200 [0], given: 37

Re: Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Nov 2011, 18:04
+1 for B.

Two events happened earlier:
1) King Alfred occupied London
2) King Alfred didn't win loyalty of his people despite occupation and fortification.

One event happened after that (also in past):
1) Danes were aware of the earlier events and used it for their advantage.

We need past perfect for earlier set of events(both of them) and simple past for the following past event to ensure clarity in timelines of events.

Crick

Kudos [?]: 200 [0], given: 37

Re: Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in   [#permalink] 07 Nov 2011, 18:04
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.