It is currently 17 Nov 2017, 11:12

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Posts: 211

Kudos [?]: 360 [1], given: 0

Location: Taipei
Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2006, 04:07
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (02:45) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 3 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government's effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument ?

A. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics.

B. other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants.

C. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them.

D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.

E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small famers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.

Kudos [?]: 360 [1], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
B
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5201

Kudos [?]: 437 [1], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2006, 04:49
1
This post received
KUDOS
I`d say (A). The domestically unemployed could switch to paint manufaturing instead.

1:41

Kudos [?]: 437 [1], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 838

Kudos [?]: 87 [1], given: 1

GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2006, 05:59
1
This post received
KUDOS
GMATT73 wrote:
I`d say (A). The domestically unemployed could switch to paint manufaturing instead.

1:41


But, if cashews are exported unprocessed, then the byproducts wouldn't be available either.
If the majority of the population is involved in farming cashews, then the increase in unemployment due to closure of processing plants may be offset by increased opportunities in farming. So, C for me.

Kudos [?]: 87 [1], given: 1

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 130

Kudos [?]: 13 [1], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2006, 15:30
1
This post received
KUDOS
I selected E because then their problem of those that process the cashews would become a larger problem thus defeating the purpose of the tariff... it would increase the amount of unemployment
_________________

A.P.

Kudos [?]: 13 [1], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Posts: 361

Kudos [?]: 51 [1], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2006, 17:42
1
This post received
KUDOS
argument is for "not" removing the tariff because of urban unemployment


A. strengthens the argument ..
B out of scope
C. so?.. it is about urban unemployment
D. strengthens the argument
E. having the tariff causes farmers to move to cities causing more unemployment

So E

Kudos [?]: 51 [1], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2892

Kudos [?]: 334 [1], given: 0

Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2006, 20:27
1
This post received
KUDOS
E

This means the unemployment in urban areas is due to problems in rural areas and if tarriff is removed then both parties will benefit.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Kudos [?]: 334 [1], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2006
Posts: 363

Kudos [?]: 77 [1], given: 3

Schools: Kellogg School of Management
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2006, 21:29
1
This post received
KUDOS
E

Kudos [?]: 77 [1], given: 3

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 439

Kudos [?]: 80 [1], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2006, 21:35
1
This post received
KUDOS
choose (E) using POE.
_________________

http://mba2010dreams.blogspot.com

Kudos [?]: 80 [1], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2004
Posts: 325

Kudos [?]: 11 [1], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Aug 2006, 05:23
1
This post received
KUDOS
Yup would be E....

Kudos [?]: 11 [1], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 701

Kudos [?]: 13 [1], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Aug 2006, 12:15
1
This post received
KUDOS
Answer should be E.

Information about by products like plastic are not given sufficient.

Kudos [?]: 13 [1], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 06 May 2006
Posts: 790

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 2

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Aug 2006, 13:22
gk3.14 wrote:
argument is for "not" removing the tariff because of urban unemployment


A. strengthens the argument ..
B out of scope
C. so?.. it is about urban unemployment
D. strengthens the argument
E. having the tariff causes farmers to move to cities causing more unemployment

So E


Nailed it. E it is...
_________________

Uh uh. I know what you're thinking. "Is the answer A, B, C, D or E?" Well to tell you the truth in all this excitement I kinda lost track myself. But you've gotta ask yourself one question: "Do I feel lucky?" Well, do ya, punk?

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 2

1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Posts: 1257

Kudos [?]: 108 [1], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Aug 2006, 13:44
1
This post received
KUDOS
E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small famers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.

If more farmers are going into the cities unemployment may rise even if the tariffs are removed.

Kudos [?]: 108 [1], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 398

Kudos [?]: 31 [1], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Aug 2006, 14:18
1
This post received
KUDOS
Going with E...

C was close for me... I was thinking that if they do not do take this action then more farmers could be out of jobs.. hence increasing umemployment

Kudos [?]: 31 [1], given: 0

  [#permalink] 28 Aug 2006, 14:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.