It is currently 21 Sep 2017, 18:17

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 23 Nov 2009
Posts: 89

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 14

Schools: Wharton..:)
Re: Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2010, 07:27
conclusion – removing the tariff would SERIOUSLY hamper govt’s effort to reduce unemployment bcoz if high tariff;s are lifted thm ppl in the urban areas whr all the processing plants are thr would not get any business.

Option E - is the only viable option coz if the crops are not profitable thn farmers will migrate to cities and increase unemployment rates, however we do have to assume tht farmers migrating to cities will not find jobs!

option C- well if more people are growing thn processing ,thn if u remove the tarrif it still creates job shortages in THE URBAN area so it's no way weakening the conclusion .
_________________

" What [i] do is not beyond anybody else's competence"- warren buffett
My Gmat experience -http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-710-q-47-v-41-tips-for-non-natives-107086.html

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 14

SVP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1508

Kudos [?]: 1394 [0], given: 2

Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Re: Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Dec 2010, 15:11
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
very confusing one.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1394 [0], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 25 Nov 2011
Posts: 249

Kudos [?]: 218 [0], given: 20

Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 3.95
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jan 2012, 05:21
cialit0506 wrote:
OA is E...

But, I still don't know why D is wrong

The whole point in the argument is about unemployment. As per D, there won;t be unemployment and hence it SUPPORTs government action.

More people are in farming whereas some people are in processing industry. Now, if by lifting the tariffs, those farmers are allowed to export, the remaining people would loose their jobs in the processing industry. Hence this option supports the govt action.

But in E: though it is talking about growing crops 'in general', in the absence of any other choice, this is considered as the 'best' option.
_________________

-------------------------
-Aravind Chembeti

Kudos [?]: 218 [0], given: 20

Intern
Joined: 16 Nov 2009
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Feb 2012, 16:06
KissGMAT wrote:
I Still feel D should be the answer.

D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew
processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.

This scenerio is helping both farmers and processing units ( thus improving urban employment)

I think D is wrong because it says cashew processing in KernLand will benefit for the low price input and the unemployment there might not increase. However the argument focuses on urban unemployment. We can deduce that because the KernLand processing industry prosper, the urban processing industry go down because it cannot buy cashew from KernLand, then urban unemployment go up. --> strengthen the argument.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2010
Posts: 122

Kudos [?]: 20 [1], given: 2

Re: Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Feb 2012, 22:50
1
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Hi All,

Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government's effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A. Some of the byproducts of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics.
B. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants.
C. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them.
D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world-market prices enable cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.
E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.

Thanks
Ravi

Kudos [?]: 20 [1], given: 2

Intern
Joined: 15 Jan 2012
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Feb 2012, 00:07
(E)

The imposition of tax on exports will make the crop even less profitable. The farmers migration to urban areas continues resulting in less cashewnuts production. This will eventually reduce the employment in cashew processing plants in urban areas. Hence weaken the conclusion : government efforts to provide more and more employment in urban areas.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2010
Posts: 122

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 2

Re: Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Feb 2012, 01:23
Thanks out of curiosity is the option C out of scope because I thought c also worked becoz if more people are in farming than processing tariff removal will not cause much increase in unemployment

What do you think

Posted from GMAT ToolKit

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 2

Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Sep 2009
Posts: 357

Kudos [?]: 573 [0], given: 2

Re: Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Feb 2012, 11:09
Hai ravi

I also think option C is the answer, just check the following link
http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/ker ... t5833.html

Kudos [?]: 573 [0], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 07 Dec 2011
Posts: 153

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 31

Location: India
Re: Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Mar 2012, 08:22
E pretty clearly. If the tariff is not lifted then unemployed cashew farmers would move to cities leading to higher unemployment anyway so it is pointless to remove the tariff to protect cashew processing plant jobs from the point of view of reducing urban unemployment.

@raviram80. The argument talks about urban unemployment and not overall (rural+urban) unemployment levels leading to C being out of scope.

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 31

Manager
Status: Do till 740 :)
Joined: 13 Jun 2011
Posts: 109

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 19

Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 460 Q35 V20
GPA: 3.6
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Apr 2012, 23:50
I think this is what happens when we try to solve un official questions

We narrow down to C and E

though E is better i eliminated it cos it was talking about crops and not specifically cashew.

We could argue whether cashew comes under crop or not and whether just cos more people are involved in crops does it mean that cashew is also part of it?

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 19

Intern
Joined: 22 Jan 2012
Posts: 9

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 2

Re: Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Apr 2012, 02:47
shankar245 wrote:
I think this is what happens when we try to solve un official questions

We narrow down to C and E

though E is better i eliminated it cos it was talking about crops and not specifically cashew.

We could argue whether cashew comes under crop or not and whether just cos more people are involved in crops does it mean that cashew is also part of it?

Very Confusing ..I Still go with C ..need clarity

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Posts: 120

Kudos [?]: 146 [0], given: 15

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 600 Q49 V23
GPA: 3.8
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Apr 2012, 12:39
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Edit: This discussion has retired. Find the new thread HERE

Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government's effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Some of the byproducts of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics.
B. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants.
C. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them.
D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world-market prices enable cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.
E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities

[Reveal] Spoiler:

Kudos [?]: 146 [0], given: 15

SVP
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1605

Kudos [?]: 581 [0], given: 36

Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Re: Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Apr 2012, 17:53
This has been posted earlier :

kernland-imposes-a-high-tariff-on-the-export-of-unprocessed-75923.html

Topic Locked.
_________________

Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 581 [0], given: 36

Manager
Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Posts: 120

Kudos [?]: 146 [2], given: 15

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 600 Q49 V23
GPA: 3.8
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2012, 01:46
2
KUDOS
KissGMAT wrote:
I Still feel D should be the answer.

D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew
processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.

This scenerio is helping both farmers and processing units ( thus improving urban employment)

E is the answer, the reason for this is that, when the small farmers in kerland leave off their lands and into the city, they are actually adding up to the unemployment number, thus this may be the alternative reason for the argument which says that removing the tariff hampers the government's effort to reduce unemployment numbers. Thus in actual sense it is not the removing of the tariff that causes an increase in the unemployment, but the migration of the farmers to the urban area that adds up to the unemployment number.
Hope this helps.

If you like my post, consider giving me some KUDOS !!!!! Like you I need them

Kudos [?]: 146 [2], given: 15

Intern
Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Posts: 47

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 7

Location: Sydney
Re: Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jul 2012, 22:41
cialit0506 wrote:
OA is E...

But, I still don't know why D is wrong

D is wrong because it doesn't weaken the argument.

The argument here is that removal of tariff will raise unemployment rate in urban areas (something that the government is trying to combat). The correct answers will be something that can show that urban unemployment will not worsen if the tariff on exports is lifted. D does not provide any argument along these lines. I felt that it is out of scope in fact.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 7

SVP
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 2132

Kudos [?]: 1570 [3], given: 8

Location: New York, NY
Re: Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Nov 2012, 10:27
3
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics.
B. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants.
C. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them.
D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.
E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.

Argument: Removing tariff would reduce employment in urban areas where the domestic processing plants are

Support: Domestic processing plants buy the unprocessed cashew nuts at a "lower" price, thanks to the high tariff that is imposed when the unprocessed cashew nuts are exported out of the country and sold to foreigners

Weakening strategies:
1) Opposite Argument
2) Opposite Support
3) Discredit the link between support and argument

Here, my initial hunch is that the "support" is not necessarily linked to the "argument". The keyword is employment. How are domestic processing plants' buying cashew nuts at a discounted price...how is that linked to employment? Specifically, "urban" employment.

If we look at (E), we DO talk specifically about urban when they mention movement of farmers into the cities.
(E) A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.

If (E) is true...then when import tariff is REMOVED then farmers DO PROFIT. If farmers profit, we know they don't MOVE into the cities, they instead stay on the farms. So in this case, since they don't go into the city, we do not have a lot of unemployed farmers in the city. And thus, the employment rate stays healthy.

So from the beginning, we may think of (E) as saying due to lack of profitable crop, farmers are entering cities. Presumably they are unemployed and this reduces employment rate in the city. But THEN, import tariffs are removed, and suddenly we HAVE a profitable crop. Thus will keep farmers on their farm, away from the cities and employment rates in the city are not affected. Thus the government's efforts to INCREASE urban employment is NOT affected - which is opposite the conclusion reached in the passage.

Kudos [?]: 1570 [3], given: 8

Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Posts: 89

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 43

Re: Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Apr 2013, 02:32
Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics.
B. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants.
C. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them.
D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.
E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 43

Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3348

Kudos [?]: 8743 [0], given: 1138

Re: Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Apr 2013, 03:58
Merged similar topic.

See the above explanation.

regards
_________________

Kudos [?]: 8743 [0], given: 1138

Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Posts: 89

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 43

Re: Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Apr 2013, 04:48
carcass wrote:
Merged similar topic.

See the above explanation.

regards

The forum automatically merges them or you merged them?

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 43

Intern
Status: Attending Duke in May!
Joined: 08 Jan 2013
Posts: 29

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 18

Location: United States (NC)
GMAT 1: 640 Q42 V35
Re: Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Apr 2013, 01:22
score780 wrote:
Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics.
B. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants.
C. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them.
D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.
E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.

Remember for CR questions that involve weakening or strengthening we need to focus on the argument (conclusion)

Conclusion: Since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years

So we're looking for a statement that will weaken the argument that removing the tariff's would hamper the effort to reduce unemployment.

Remember in CR questions all the statements in the passage are considered true unless otherwise stated.

Facts:
- The tariff's are driving the farmers to sell the cashews to domestic processing plants at lower than world market prices.
- If the tariff's were removed the farmers could sell at higher prices to world markets and profit more.

A.) Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics. This doesn't tell us anything about the unemployment issue in the conclusion. It implies that the by-products of the cashews are keeping other plants open (the paints and plastics), so this will strengthen the argument slightly, but even still it's a stretch to infer that.

B.) Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants. This tells us that other countries governments are subsidizing processing plants to keep them open. This is a useless statement that neither strengthens nor weakens the argument.

C.) More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them. This statement tells you about the ratio to farmers to processors. Farmers>Processors. This has no impact on the unemployment of the processors if the tariff's were removed. It only tells you if the tariff's were removed the smaller party would be impacted more, which is still undesirable. If we had 50,000 farmers and 49,500 processors, it's still a huge loss for Kernland and this statement could still be satisfied.

D.) Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices. This statement strengthens the argument of the author. The tariff's MUST stay in place so that the Kernland processors can sell the cashews at a competitive price. This is the opposite of what we're looking for.

E.) A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities. BINGO! Exactly what we're looking for. It hits on both of our facts from the passage and finds another cause for the unemployment problem other than the conclusion that was stated. Fact from passage: The cashew sells are not profitable to the farmers. Effect - Because of this the farmers are coming into the city adding to the unemployment problem. If the tariff's were removed, the farmers could farm cashews and sell them for a higher profit, which would prevent them from moving into the urban areas creating less competition for jobs, which would lower the unemployment.

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 18

Re: Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed   [#permalink] 17 Apr 2013, 01:22

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4    Next  [ 62 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
45 Tariffs on imported manufactured goods 42 02 Jul 2017, 03:54
15 Prohibitively high tariffs on salmon from Winterland allow 9 22 Mar 2017, 04:12
19 Last year, the government of country A imposed large tariffs on steel 21 18 Jul 2017, 10:14
28 Country X imposes heavy tariffs on imported manufactured 57 28 Jun 2017, 03:33
11 QOTD: Kernland imposes a high tariff on the 5 18 Jul 2017, 10:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by