It is currently 20 Nov 2017, 10:41

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Kirkland's theory of corporate structure can be represented

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 253

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

Kirkland's theory of corporate structure can be represented [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2006, 18:42
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 4 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Kirkland's theory of corporate structure can be represented by a truncated pyramid. There are workers, middle management, and executive management, but no head of the corporation. Instead, all major decisions are made by comittee. As a consequence, in Kirkland's structure, risky, cutting- edge technologies cannot be developed.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

a. Cutting-edge technologies are typically developed by entrepreneurs, not by big corporations.
b. Only single individuals will make risky decisions.
c. An individual is more likely to take a gamble on his own than in a group.
d. All heads of corporations reached their positions by taking risks.
e. All cutting edge technologies involve some risk.

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 838

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 1

GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42
Re: CR-Kirkland's theory of corporate structure [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2006, 18:50
E

B. Doesn't say so in the paragraph

C. Same argument as for B

D. No talk about how heads are formed ( and no pun intended)

E. Since all major decisions are made by a committee, no risky, cutting edge technologies can be developed. Implies that all cutting edge technologies involve some risk.

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Oct 2006
Posts: 266

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-Kirkland's theory of corporate structure [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2006, 21:35
CONCLUSION=no risky decisions are taken by committee
evidence= all decisions are taken by committee

if only single individuals will make risky decisions. meaning that committe wont take risky decisions because it's decisons are combined.

faifai0714 wrote:
Kirkland's theory of corporate structure can be represented by a truncated pyramid. There are workers, middle management, and executive management, but no head of the corporation. Instead, all major decisions are made by comittee. As a consequence, in Kirkland's structure, risky, cutting- edge technologies cannot be developed.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

a. Cutting-edge technologies are typically developed by entrepreneurs, not by big corporations.
b. Only single individuals will make risky decisions.
c. An individual is more likely to take a gamble on his own than in a group.
d. All heads of corporations reached their positions by taking risks.
e. All cutting edge technologies involve some risk.

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2006
Posts: 363

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 3

Schools: Kellogg School of Management

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2006, 21:41
C ?

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 3

Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 326

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2006, 22:41
I am up for (B) too.
_________________

A well-balanced person is one who has a drink in each of his hands.

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1124

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangalore

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2006, 03:46
Narrowed it down to B and c.
b seems to be a little too strong. So I'll go with c.

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 700

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2006, 05:08
Narrowed down to B and C.

I will go for C.

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1883

Kudos [?]: 386 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-Kirkland's theory of corporate structure [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2006, 05:53
faifai0714 wrote:
Kirkland's theory of corporate structure can be represented by a truncated pyramid. There are workers, middle management, and executive management, but no head of the corporation. Instead, all major decisions are made by comittee. As a consequence, in Kirkland's structure, risky, cutting- edge technologies cannot be developed.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

a. Cutting-edge technologies are typically developed by entrepreneurs, not by big corporations.
b. Only single individuals will make risky decisions.
c. An individual is more likely to take a gamble on his own than in a group.
d. All heads of corporations reached their positions by taking risks.
e. All cutting edge technologies involve some risk.

uhm, tentative between B and C as well...
I'd pick B though since C (noted "more likely") is kinda open to a possibility that the committee still carry out some risky decision, thus there's still chance for risky technologies to develop ....In order to support "cannot" in the conclusion, B is more forceful.

Kudos [?]: 386 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 73

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2006, 05:53
I pick B.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1011

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2006, 06:12
For me it was a choice between B and E.

"All" in E makes it an extreme statement and hence ruled out.

Hence B.
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 171

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Location: paris

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2006, 06:36
B 2

_________________

time is not on my side

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 253

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2006, 10:00
The OA is B.

The reason ( according to my bk) is the conclusion mentions that because "risky, cutting- edge technologies cannot be developed. ", hence "only individuals make risky decisions. The key answer are the words cannot and only.

I'm not convinced by the OA(B) because only indivduals make risky decisions in terms of what? C explains more concisely by comparing an individual's gambling decision vs a group's decision.

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 523

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-Kirkland's theory of corporate structure [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2006, 10:13
faifai0714 wrote:
Kirkland's theory of corporate structure can be represented by a truncated pyramid. There are workers, middle management, and executive management, but no head of the corporation. Instead, all major decisions are made by comittee. As a consequence, in Kirkland's structure, risky, cutting- edge technologies cannot be developed.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

a. Cutting-edge technologies are typically developed by entrepreneurs, not by big corporations.
b. Only single individuals will make risky decisions.
c. An individual is more likely to take a gamble on his own than in a group.
d. All heads of corporations reached their positions by taking risks.
e. All cutting edge technologies involve some risk.

C sounds more convincing than B.

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 253

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-Kirkland's theory of corporate structure [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2006, 10:40
Juaz wrote:
faifai0714 wrote:
Kirkland's theory of corporate structure can be represented by a truncated pyramid. There are workers, middle management, and executive management, but no head of the corporation. Instead, all major decisions are made by comittee. As a consequence, in Kirkland's structure, risky, cutting- edge technologies cannot be developed.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

a. Cutting-edge technologies are typically developed by entrepreneurs, not by big corporations.
b. Only single individuals will make risky decisions.
c. An individual is more likely to take a gamble on his own than in a group.
d. All heads of corporations reached their positions by taking risks.
e. All cutting edge technologies involve some risk.

C sounds more convincing than B.

Well I'm glad I'm not the only one that is unconvinced. Maybe I was overthinking the answer on this one. However an OA is an OA.We have to respect the answer ultimately so that we won't make the same mistakes next time.

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1161

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2006, 19:59
C is better. B is a bit extreme with only.

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1011

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2006, 20:13
B sounds like calculated risk..

C sounds like being reckless..

No?
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2006
Posts: 95

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-Kirkland's theory of corporate structure [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2006, 20:24
B is the best.

Generally speaking agree that it is safe to stay away from too extreme options in GMAT. But in this specific case, the argument itself explicitly takes the extreme position "risky, cutting -ege tech CANNOT be developed". So I think B fits better compared to C which uses "more likely".
_________________

http://gmatstuff.blogspot.com

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1124

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangalore
Re: CR-Kirkland's theory of corporate structure [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2006, 20:29
laxieqv wrote:
faifai0714 wrote:
Kirkland's theory of corporate structure can be represented by a truncated pyramid. There are workers, middle management, and executive management, but no head of the corporation. Instead, all major decisions are made by comittee. As a consequence, in Kirkland's structure, risky, cutting- edge technologies cannot be developed.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

a. Cutting-edge technologies are typically developed by entrepreneurs, not by big corporations.
b. Only single individuals will make risky decisions.
c. An individual is more likely to take a gamble on his own than in a group.
d. All heads of corporations reached their positions by taking risks.
e. All cutting edge technologies involve some risk.

uhm, tentative between B and C as well...
I'd pick B though since C (noted "more likely") is kinda open to a possibility that the committee still carry out some risky decision, thus there's still chance for risky technologies to develop ....In order to support "cannot" in the conclusion, B is more forceful.

Good point...

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 253

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2006, 21:34
hmm...finally i get it...thanks

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

11 Oct 2006, 21:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Kirkland's theory of corporate structure can be represented

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.