It is currently 22 Nov 2017, 04:29

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 43

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 23

Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jul 2017, 07:50
If in C, protect was plural (protects). Would it have been correct? The OG answer says that "that require" is wordy and unnecessary, but that part sounds better to me. Again, assuming it didn't have the protect issue.

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 23

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Jun 2017
Posts: 5

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 35

Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jul 2017, 02:10
hi all,
i know this sub-verb agreement question.
But however i fail to understand the how the Subject is compliance here.
My question will sound silly,but please help me identify the main subject and main verb

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 35

1 KUDOS received
Board of Directors
User avatar
D
Status: Aiming MBA
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 2770

Kudos [?]: 917 [1], given: 67

Location: India
GPA: 3.65
WE: Information Technology (Health Care)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jul 2017, 02:36
1
This post received
KUDOS
brandon7 wrote:
If in C, protect was plural (protects). Would it have been correct? The OG answer says that "that require" is wordy and unnecessary, but that part sounds better to me. Again, assuming it didn't have the protect issue.


namrata88 wrote:
hi all,
i know this sub-verb agreement question.
But however i fail to understand the how the Subject is compliance here.
My question will sound silly,but please help me identify the main subject and main verb


Hi namrata88 / brandon7 ,

Welcome to GMATClub :)

Here I go:

1st Query:

Yes, in that case C would have been correct. But note that there is no reason to reject option B as well. So, a typical GMAT question will never have two such options at the same time. Hence, rest assured about that. :)

2nd Query:


Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting adult sea turtles.

The clause after 'saying that' is an independent clause.

their compliance with laws requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting adult sea turtles.

Now, look at the above sentence, if you remove the fluff, you will find something as follows:

their compliance with laws requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting adult sea turtles.

Can you see the subject now?

Compliance is the subject and is protecting is the verb.

Let me know in case of any concern. :)
_________________

How I improved from V21 to V40! ?

Kudos [?]: 917 [1], given: 67

Expert Post
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
S
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2355

Kudos [?]: 9291 [0], given: 341

Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jul 2017, 04:51
brandon7 wrote:
If in C, protect was plural (protects). Would it have been correct? The OG answer says that "that require" is wordy and unnecessary, but that part sounds better to me. Again, assuming it didn't have the protect issue.



Hello brandon7,

I will be glad to resolve your doubt. :-)

Choice C of this official sentence has only the subject verb number agreement error. While their compliance is a singular subject, protect is a plural verb.

Please note that protects is a singular verb that will agree in number with the singular subject their compliance.

Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
_________________












| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Kudos [?]: 9291 [0], given: 341

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
S
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2355

Kudos [?]: 9291 [1], given: 341

Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jul 2017, 04:57
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
abhimahna wrote:
Hi namrata88 / brandon7 ,

Welcome to GMATClub :)

Here I go:

1st Query:

Yes, in that case C would have been correct. But note that there is no reason to reject option B as well. So, a typical GMAT question will never have two such options at the same time. Hence, rest assured about that. :)

2nd Query:


Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting adult sea turtles.

The clause after 'saying that' is an independent clause.

their compliance with laws requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting adult sea turtles.

Now, look at the above sentence, if you remove the fluff, you will find something as follows:

their compliance with laws requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting adult sea turtles.

Can you see the subject now?

Compliance is the subject and is protecting is the verb.

Let me know in case of any concern. :)


Hello abhimahna,


You have presented very crisp analyses here. Great job there.

However, I would just like to let you know that what follows saying that is not an independent clause. It is a dependent clause because the connector that always starts a dependent clause.

The connector that always associates with the clause that it starts. So essentially, after saying, we have a dependent clause that reads: that their compliance with laws... is protecting adult sea turtles.

Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
_________________












| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Kudos [?]: 9291 [1], given: 341

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 25 Dec 2016
Posts: 3

Kudos [?]: 3 [1], given: 13

Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Aug 2017, 02:40
1
This post received
KUDOS
souvik101990 wrote:
Concept tested: SV agreement, Meaning.
Difficulty level: High
Illustration:
This question tests a very important aspect of meaning. First, we know
that the main verb in the underlined portion “protect” is wrong as the main
subject “compliance is singular. (Note that protect is not being used as a command
subjunctive in A. “be” is used as the command subjunctive).

According to this logic, A and C are wrong.
Now among B, D and E, “to require” indicates purpose of the law which is not the intended meaning
(please refer to the tip below). So, D and E are incorrect.
B is the correct answer.

Tip: “Laws to require” indicates purpose of the law, but “laws requiring indicates
contents of the law. While this might sound very obvious to natives, but non natives
might have to struggle to get this clearly. Consider the following examples.
1.Arms act is passed to discourage random public shootings. Correct
2.Arms act is passed to levy heavy fines on people who carry unlicensed
firearm. Wrong.

2 is wrong because the arms act is not issued to levy fines. It is issued to prevent
something by levying fines. So the correct option is B.





I am very thankful for this explanation... I was completely clueless about why D,E was rejected. I read so many posts but no one explained it so clearly as you did.
Thanks again

Kudos [?]: 3 [1], given: 13

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 02 Nov 2015
Posts: 176

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 121

GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V29
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Aug 2017, 05:34
Was stuck badly between A and B.
But earlier explanations helped me.

Thanks to all GMAT buddies especially souvik.

Sent from my Lenovo TAB S8-50LC using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 121

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 12 Oct 2016
Posts: 31

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2017, 07:49
Can someone explain why C is incorrect?
There is no Subject-Verb error and they agree in number.
protect.... modifies compliance properly
and the use of "that require" seems to be correct as well.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

Top Contributor
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4314

Kudos [?]: 8185 [0], given: 364

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2017, 09:27
Top Contributor
In C, the singular 'compliance' cannot take the plural verb 'protect'
_________________

Can you solve at least some SC questions without delving into the initial statement?

Narendran 98845 44509

Kudos [?]: 8185 [0], given: 364

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 484

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 342

Concentration: Finance, Marketing
CAT Tests
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Aug 2017, 21:50
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.

A. requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect
B. requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
C. that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect
D. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting
E. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting


Compliance is subject and it is singular. so A,D,C ruled out.
B,E => compliance to require is correct if it is ultimate goal of law.

Ultimate goal here is to protect adult sea turtles. so TO is wrong here.

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 342

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Status: IF YOU CAN DREAM IT, YOU CAN DO IT
Joined: 03 Jul 2017
Posts: 153

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 13

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Oct 2017, 23:26
In this question I made an error of identifying the wrong Subject and said that the devices are the subject. But later realized that devices cannot be the subject because follows the prepositional phrase with and hence cannot be the subject. Is my reasoning correct?

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 13

VP
VP
User avatar
G
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1082

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 541

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: 314 Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Oct 2017, 02:55
nevergiveup wrote:
OG16 SC134
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.

A. requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect
B. requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
C. that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect
D. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting
E. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting

Please explain your answers. Thanks.


Hi egmat

What is the difference between laws requiring and laws that require ?
Also i have seen question with such structure .
How can one identify the where to use them properly.

Regards,
Arvind
_________________

We are more often frightened than hurt; and we suffer more from imagination than from reality

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 541

Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f   [#permalink] 21 Oct 2017, 02:55

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4   5   6   [ 112 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.