It is currently 19 Mar 2018, 07:49

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 42
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Jul 2017, 07:50
If in C, protect was plural (protects). Would it have been correct? The OG answer says that "that require" is wordy and unnecessary, but that part sounds better to me. Again, assuming it didn't have the protect issue.
Intern
Joined: 03 Jun 2017
Posts: 5
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Jul 2017, 02:10
hi all,
i know this sub-verb agreement question.
But however i fail to understand the how the Subject is compliance here.
My question will sound silly,but please help me identify the main subject and main verb
Board of Directors
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3235
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Jul 2017, 02:36
1
KUDOS
brandon7 wrote:
If in C, protect was plural (protects). Would it have been correct? The OG answer says that "that require" is wordy and unnecessary, but that part sounds better to me. Again, assuming it didn't have the protect issue.

namrata88 wrote:
hi all,
i know this sub-verb agreement question.
But however i fail to understand the how the Subject is compliance here.
My question will sound silly,but please help me identify the main subject and main verb

Hi namrata88 / brandon7 ,

Welcome to GMATClub

Here I go:

1st Query:

Yes, in that case C would have been correct. But note that there is no reason to reject option B as well. So, a typical GMAT question will never have two such options at the same time. Hence, rest assured about that.

2nd Query:

Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting adult sea turtles.

The clause after 'saying that' is an independent clause.

their compliance with laws requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting adult sea turtles.

Now, look at the above sentence, if you remove the fluff, you will find something as follows:

their compliance with laws requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting adult sea turtles.

Can you see the subject now?

Compliance is the subject and is protecting is the verb.

Let me know in case of any concern.
_________________

How I improved from V21 to V40! ?

How to use this forum in THE BEST way?

e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2459
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Jul 2017, 04:51
brandon7 wrote:
If in C, protect was plural (protects). Would it have been correct? The OG answer says that "that require" is wordy and unnecessary, but that part sounds better to me. Again, assuming it didn't have the protect issue.

Hello brandon7,

I will be glad to resolve your doubt.

Choice C of this official sentence has only the subject verb number agreement error. While their compliance is a singular subject, protect is a plural verb.

Please note that protects is a singular verb that will agree in number with the singular subject their compliance.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2459
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Jul 2017, 04:57
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
abhimahna wrote:
Hi namrata88 / brandon7 ,

Welcome to GMATClub

Here I go:

1st Query:

Yes, in that case C would have been correct. But note that there is no reason to reject option B as well. So, a typical GMAT question will never have two such options at the same time. Hence, rest assured about that.

2nd Query:

Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting adult sea turtles.

The clause after 'saying that' is an independent clause.

their compliance with laws requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting adult sea turtles.

Now, look at the above sentence, if you remove the fluff, you will find something as follows:

their compliance with laws requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting adult sea turtles.

Can you see the subject now?

Compliance is the subject and is protecting is the verb.

Let me know in case of any concern.

Hello abhimahna,

You have presented very crisp analyses here. Great job there.

However, I would just like to let you know that what follows saying that is not an independent clause. It is a dependent clause because the connector that always starts a dependent clause.

The connector that always associates with the clause that it starts. So essentially, after saying, we have a dependent clause that reads: that their compliance with laws... is protecting adult sea turtles.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Intern
Joined: 25 Dec 2016
Posts: 3
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Aug 2017, 02:40
1
KUDOS
souvik101990 wrote:
Concept tested: SV agreement, Meaning.
Difficulty level: High
Illustration:
This question tests a very important aspect of meaning. First, we know
that the main verb in the underlined portion “protect” is wrong as the main
subject “compliance is singular. (Note that protect is not being used as a command
subjunctive in A. “be” is used as the command subjunctive).

According to this logic, A and C are wrong.
Now among B, D and E, “to require” indicates purpose of the law which is not the intended meaning
(please refer to the tip below). So, D and E are incorrect.
B is the correct answer.

Tip: “Laws to require” indicates purpose of the law, but “laws requiring indicates
contents of the law. While this might sound very obvious to natives, but non natives
might have to struggle to get this clearly. Consider the following examples.
1.Arms act is passed to discourage random public shootings. Correct
2.Arms act is passed to levy heavy fines on people who carry unlicensed
firearm. Wrong.

2 is wrong because the arms act is not issued to levy fines. It is issued to prevent
something by levying fines. So the correct option is B.

I am very thankful for this explanation... I was completely clueless about why D,E was rejected. I read so many posts but no one explained it so clearly as you did.
Thanks again
Manager
Joined: 02 Nov 2015
Posts: 174
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V29
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Aug 2017, 05:34
Was stuck badly between A and B.
But earlier explanations helped me.

Thanks to all GMAT buddies especially souvik.

Sent from my Lenovo TAB S8-50LC using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2016
Posts: 69
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Aug 2017, 07:49
Can someone explain why C is incorrect?
There is no Subject-Verb error and they agree in number.
protect.... modifies compliance properly
and the use of "that require" seems to be correct as well.
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4314
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Aug 2017, 09:27
Expert's post
Top Contributor
In C, the singular 'compliance' cannot take the plural verb 'protect'
_________________

Can you solve at least some SC questions without delving into the initial statement?

Narendran 98845 44509

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 471
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

31 Aug 2017, 21:50
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.

A. requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect
B. requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
C. that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect
D. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting
E. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting

Compliance is subject and it is singular. so A,D,C ruled out.
B,E => compliance to require is correct if it is ultimate goal of law.

Ultimate goal here is to protect adult sea turtles. so TO is wrong here.
Manager
Status: IF YOU CAN DREAM IT, YOU CAN DO IT
Joined: 03 Jul 2017
Posts: 203
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Oct 2017, 23:26
In this question I made an error of identifying the wrong Subject and said that the devices are the subject. But later realized that devices cannot be the subject because follows the prepositional phrase with and hence cannot be the subject. Is my reasoning correct?
VP
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1155
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: 314 Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Oct 2017, 02:55
nevergiveup wrote:
OG16 SC134
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.

A. requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect
B. requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
C. that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect
D. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting
E. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting

Hi egmat

What is the difference between laws requiring and laws that require ?
Also i have seen question with such structure .
How can one identify the where to use them properly.

Regards,
Arvind
_________________

Please give kudos if you found my answers useful

Manager
Joined: 11 Jun 2017
Posts: 84
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Nov 2017, 15:28
nevergiveup wrote:
The Official Guide for GMAT Review, 12th Edition, 2009

Practice Question
Question No.: SC 133
Page: 682

Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.

(A) requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect

(B) requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting

(C) that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect

(D) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting

(E) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
Intern
Joined: 20 Sep 2017
Posts: 5
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Nov 2017, 11:56
I chose B because it seemed the closest answer to me, but I don't understand why the correct answer should not "requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets was protecting" instead of "on shrimp nets is protecting"?
Can anyone explain it to me please?

Thank You!
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2459
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Nov 2017, 13:33
longhaul123 wrote:
In this question I made an error of identifying the wrong Subject and said that the devices are the subject. But later realized that devices cannot be the subject because follows the prepositional phrase with and hence cannot be the subject. Is my reasoning correct?

Hello longhaul123,

I am not sure if you still have this doubt. Here is the explanation nonetheless.

In Choice A, devices surely is the subject but not in any other choice.

Please note that those nouns cannot act as the subject that are immediately preceded by a preposition. But that is not the case with devices in any of the answer choices.

In all the other four answer choices, devices actually acts as the object of the action require.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2459
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Nov 2017, 13:39
arvind910619 wrote:
Hi egmat

What is the difference between laws requiring and laws that require ?
Also i have seen question with such structure .
How can one identify the where to use them properly.

Regards,
Arvind

Hello Arvind / arvind910619,

I am not sure if you still have this doubt. But there is the explanation.

There is no difference between the expressions laws requiring and laws that require. They both mean the same, and hence, we cannot choose one over the other.

Choice C is incorrect for the incorrect verb protect and not because of laws that require.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2459
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Nov 2017, 13:45
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
kimhoon27 wrote:
I chose B because it seemed the closest answer to me, but I don't understand why the correct answer should not "requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets was protecting" instead of "on shrimp nets is protecting"?
Can anyone explain it to me please?

Thank You!

I will be glad to help you out with this one.

Firstly, there is no answer choice that gives the option to choose was protecting. All the answer choices uses the present tense verbs.

Secondly, use of present tense verb in the original sentence that this action of protecting the turtles is prevalent in the present. It is not that the turtles were being protected in the past. They still are being protected by the local shrimpers.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Intern
Joined: 28 Jan 2018
Posts: 48
Location: Taiwan
GPA: 3.34
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Feb 2018, 20:42
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.

A. requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect

B. requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting

C. that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect

D. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting

E. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting

"their compliance" is singular; therefore, (A), (D), (C) are out.
"requiring" is a modifier, modifying "laws"
"compliance" does not require, laws require. (B) is correct
(E) is saying, "their compliance to require turtle-excluder devices is protecting sea turtles." This does not make sense

Please correct my explanation for (E) if it is wrong.
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Jun 2012
Posts: 343
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GPA: 3.76
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Feb 2018, 02:52
Hi egmat team,

I have a question. if i change option A and remove S-V error, will it be correct then?

egmat wrote:
arvind910619 wrote:
Hi egmat

What is the difference between laws requiring and laws that require ?
Also i have seen question with such structure .
How can one identify the where to use them properly.

Regards,
Arvind

Hello Arvind / arvind910619,

I am not sure if you still have this doubt. But there is the explanation.

There is no difference between the expressions laws requiring and laws that require. They both mean the same, and hence, we cannot choose one over the other.

Choice C is incorrect for the incorrect verb protect and not because of laws that require.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.

_________________

Push yourself again and again. Don't give an inch until the final buzzer sounds. -Larry Bird
Success isn't something that just happens - success is learned, success is practiced and then it is shared. -Sparky Anderson
-S

Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f   [#permalink] 08 Feb 2018, 02:52

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4   5   6   [ 119 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit f

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.