Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 17:58 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 17:58

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
VP
VP
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Posts: 1115
Own Kudos [?]: 2162 [11]
Given Kudos: 368
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 6: 710 Q47 V41
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2019
Posts: 155
Own Kudos [?]: 24 [2]
Given Kudos: 16
Location: India
Concentration: Economics, Finance
Schools: Johnson '21
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.54
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2018
Posts: 60
Own Kudos [?]: 122 [1]
Given Kudos: 33
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Oct 2017
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Send PM
Re: Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad [#permalink]
1
Kudos
the question clearly mentions " the ten other seafood restaurants in Tritonaville has remained high, and no other case of food poisoning has been documented at any of them." How can the other restaurants land up in legal trouble.
VP
VP
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Posts: 1115
Own Kudos [?]: 2162 [1]
Given Kudos: 368
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 6: 710 Q47 V41
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Send PM
Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad [#permalink]
1
Kudos
aggvipul wrote:
dcummins wrote:
Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad case of food poisoning from a meal at one seafood restaurant in Tritonaville, and she successfully sued the restaurant for a large sum of money. The story was popular in the town, and the size of the financial settlement made the national news. Since that case, patronship at this and the ten other seafood restaurants in Tritonaville has remained high, and no other case of food poisoning has been documented at any of them. Nevertheless, some of the other seafood restaurants have experienced a severe drop in profits, so much so that one restaurant was forced to close. This is not surprising, though, because _____________.

dcummins buddy pls remove "other"(highlighted) from the prompt, this is rendering to whole lot of churn here



Not sure what you're talking about.. nothing is highlighted. You highlighted "other" in your own quote dude.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 Feb 2019
Posts: 45
Own Kudos [?]: 25 [1]
Given Kudos: 73
Send PM
Re: Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad [#permalink]
1
Kudos
The stimulus is ambiguous but the "other" has to refer to those 10 restaurants to make logical sense.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Posts: 4946
Own Kudos [?]: 7624 [0]
Given Kudos: 215
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad [#permalink]
Quote:
Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad case of food poisoning from a meal at one seafood restaurant in Tritonaville, and she successfully sued the restaurant for a large sum of money. The story was popular in the town, and the size of the financial settlement made the national news. Since that case, patronship at this and the ten other seafood restaurants in Tritonaville has remained high, and no other case of food poisoning has been documented at any of them. Nevertheless, some of the other seafood restaurants have experienced a severe drop in profits, so much so that one restaurant was forced to close. This is not surprising, though, because _____________.

Which of the following most logically completes the argument given?

(A) the restaurant market in Tritonaville is fiercely competitive with a large number of good restaurants of many cuisines, making it hard for all of them to remain solvent
(B) some of the cooking methods used for certain specific types of seafood food are less likely to kill germs than are the cooking methods used in most other cuisines
(C) national studies have indicated that, in the wake of a food poisoning scare, restaurant visits typically fall, especially at restaurants of the same cuisine as the original incident
(D) certain types of commercial fishing vessels can be considerably more unsanitary than most other commercial vessels responsible for food transport
(E) these eleven restaurants have incurred legal fees defending themselves against unfounded imitative claims


The right answer is E. What we are looking for is an explanation for why other restaurants might be in trouble, which has been impacted by this particular event.

A - This is tempting, but this situation already existed. The food poisoning case doesn't change the situation, so this doesn't follow from the premises of the argument. OUT

B - This actually hurts the argument! OUT

C - This is tempting too, but we already know that this DIDN'T happen. OUT

D - This is totally unrelated. OUT

E - This actually makes sense because it offers an explanation for why the restaurants are struggling despite high patronage.

- Matoo
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 Mar 2015
Posts: 85
Own Kudos [?]: 46 [0]
Given Kudos: 1962
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V28
GPA: 3.1
Send PM
Re: Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad [#permalink]
Nikita1997 wrote:
I don't get this solution. The question says other, some of the other seafood restaurants have experienced a severe drop in profits
; which should mean other than the 11 restaurants. How is this some other referring to those 11 only......

yup same question and just because of this reason i marked Option A
Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 Dec 2018
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 15
Send PM
Re: Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad [#permalink]
The argument talks about profit going down means it should be related to sales or cost of operating.

Between C and E, I would go for C because C gives a reason for other than the 11 restaurants. Can someone pls explain why this thought process is wrong. Also, how does the “other” refer to the 11 restaurants?

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2017
Status:Current Student
Posts: 238
Own Kudos [?]: 368 [0]
Given Kudos: 28
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
WE:Operations (Retail)
Send PM
Re: Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad [#permalink]
[quote="dcummins"]Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad case of food poisoning from a meal at one seafood restaurant in Tritonaville, and she successfully sued the restaurant for a large sum of money. The story was popular in the town, and the size of the financial settlement made the national news. Since that case, patronship at this and the ten other seafood restaurants in Tritonaville has remained high, and no other case of food poisoning has been documented at any of them. Nevertheless, some of the other seafood restaurants have experienced a severe drop in profits, so much so that one restaurant was forced to close. This is not surprising, though, because _____________.

dcummins buddy pls remove "other"(highlighted) from the prompt, this is rendering to whole lot of churn here
Director
Director
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Status:Learning
Posts: 876
Own Kudos [?]: 566 [0]
Given Kudos: 755
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad [#permalink]
Nikita1997 wrote:
I don't get this solution. The question says other, some of the other seafood restaurants have experienced a severe drop in profits
; which should mean other than the 11 restaurants. How is this some other referring to those 11 only......


Hi Nikita,

" Other " is not referring to the 11 seafood restaurants. "Other" is referring to the restaurants excluding those 11.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Jul 2019
Status:No knowledge goes waste
Posts: 73
Own Kudos [?]: 37 [0]
Given Kudos: 678
Location: Norway
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GPA: 3.3
WE:Corporate Finance (Commercial Banking)
Send PM
Re: Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad [#permalink]
But in E, it is stated that the 11 restaurants (which are in good position because of patronship), it is not stated that restaurants other than these are facing problems..
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Jun 2019
Posts: 28
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [0]
Given Kudos: 56
Location: India
Schools:
GMAT 1: 530 Q44 V19
Send PM
Re: Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad [#permalink]
other restaurants here imply restaurants other than those 11, but in the explanation it says that those 11 restaurants were suffering from profit decline. what i understood was that there are some other restaurants other than those in Triton .............. this is so confusing!! please explain
VP
VP
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Status:It's near - I can see.
Posts: 1479
Own Kudos [?]: 1600 [0]
Given Kudos: 1002
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Operations
GPA: 3.01
WE:Engineering (Real Estate)
Send PM
Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad [#permalink]
dcummins wrote:
Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad case of food poisoning from a meal at one seafood restaurant in Tritonaville, and she successfully sued the restaurant for a large sum of money. The story was popular in the town, and the size of the financial settlement made the national news. Since that case, patronship at this and the ten other seafood restaurants in Tritonaville has remained high, and no other case of food poisoning has been documented at any of them. Nevertheless, some of the other seafood restaurants have experienced a severe drop in profits, so much so that one restaurant was forced to close. This is not surprising, though, because _____________.

Which of the following most logically completes the argument given?

(A) the restaurant market in Tritonaville is fiercely competitive with a large number of good restaurants of many cuisines, making it hard for all of them to remain solvent
(B) some of the cooking methods used for certain specific types of seafood food are less likely to kill germs than are the cooking methods used in most other cuisines
(C) national studies have indicated that, in the wake of a food poisoning scare, restaurant visits typically fall, especially at restaurants of the same cuisine as the original incident
(D) certain types of commercial fishing vessels can be considerably more unsanitary than most other commercial vessels responsible for food transport
(E) these eleven restaurants have incurred legal fees defending themselves against unfounded imitative claims


Though not a very strong contender, Option E is the only choice better than others.
Option A is wrong as this situation is already in place, and also it does not connect to food poisoning case.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 Jan 2018
Posts: 23
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 198
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad [#permalink]
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Posts: 4946
Own Kudos [?]: 7624 [0]
Given Kudos: 215
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad [#permalink]
shubham2312 wrote:
Nikita1997 wrote:
I don't get this solution. The question says other, some of the other seafood restaurants have experienced a severe drop in profits
; which should mean other than the 11 restaurants. How is this some other referring to those 11 only......

yup same question and just because of this reason i marked Option A


It refers to the same set of 'other restaurants' from the 11. Since it says "some of *the* other seafood..." it means that this refers to the same set of other spoken about, not just any other ones.

The part that is paradoxical is, how can it be the case that with high patronage, restaurants are still shutting down. A does not work because even before the woman reported the food poisoning, this competitive situation already existed, and there was no significant drop in profits. What we want is some explanation of how this situation could have caused an impact, even though the impact was not direct.

- Matoo
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Posts: 4946
Own Kudos [?]: 7624 [0]
Given Kudos: 215
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad [#permalink]
Vishalmechie wrote:
The argument talks about profit going down means it should be related to sales or cost of operating.

Between C and E, I would go for C because C gives a reason for other than the 11 restaurants. Can someone pls explain why this thought process is wrong. Also, how does the “other” refer to the 11 restaurants?

Posted from my mobile device


The mistake here is that we know that this did NOT happen at *the* other restaurants. Maybe usually visitation tends to go down, but we are told in the premises here that visitation remained the same. Therefore, as you said, it has to be related to operating costs. Fighting frivolous legal battles is an operating cost that went up, thereby explaining the profit drops.

The operative word is *the* other, so we are talking about a specific set of 'other' that was already mentioned before, it can only be about these 11.

- Matoo
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Posts: 4946
Own Kudos [?]: 7624 [0]
Given Kudos: 215
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad [#permalink]
Ketakindu123 wrote:
the question clearly mentions " the ten other seafood restaurants in Tritonaville has remained high, and no other case of food poisoning has been documented at any of them." How can the other restaurants land up in legal trouble.


That is exactly the point. They are ending up in legal trouble because of frivolous lawsuits. Without having done something wrong, they have more cases filed against them. This increases costs and therefore causes them to go bankrupt despite having patronage.

- Matoo
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Aug 2019
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad [#permalink]
Problem with OA

Here , the statement "no other CASE of food poisoning has been documented" ,would indicate that there where no other cases of food poisoning , whether frivolous or not. The use of the word "CASE" can encompass both true example of something or an event that later turned out be true/false. I can,for example have a case of food poisoning that is still in court , and whose truth is still subject to debate, such events can still be documented as cases(an event whose truth is subject to debate) of food poisoning.

CASE meaning :- a particular situation or an example of something.

Normal course of events

A person complains that he has food poisoning.(event take place)
The person approaches the court that views this as a CASE.
Here the incident in itself is enough to warrant the use of the word 'CASE'.

Ordinary usage
Numerous cases of theft where documented, which later turned out to be false.

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Aug 2022
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 228
Send PM
Re: Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad [#permalink]
CrackverbalGMAT wrote:
Quote:
Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad case of food poisoning from a meal at one seafood restaurant in Tritonaville, and she successfully sued the restaurant for a large sum of money. The story was popular in the town, and the size of the financial settlement made the national news. Since that case, patronship at this and the ten other seafood restaurants in Tritonaville has remained high, and no other case of food poisoning has been documented at any of them. Nevertheless, some of the other seafood restaurants have experienced a severe drop in profits, so much so that one restaurant was forced to close. This is not surprising, though, because _____________.

Which of the following most logically completes the argument given?

(A) the restaurant market in Tritonaville is fiercely competitive with a large number of good restaurants of many cuisines, making it hard for all of them to remain solvent
(B) some of the cooking methods used for certain specific types of seafood food are less likely to kill germs than are the cooking methods used in most other cuisines
(C) national studies have indicated that, in the wake of a food poisoning scare, restaurant visits typically fall, especially at restaurants of the same cuisine as the original incident
(D) certain types of commercial fishing vessels can be considerably more unsanitary than most other commercial vessels responsible for food transport
(E) these eleven restaurants have incurred legal fees defending themselves against unfounded imitative claims


The right answer is E. What we are looking for is an explanation for why other restaurants might be in trouble, which has been impacted by this particular event.

A - This is tempting, but this situation already existed. The food poisoning case doesn't change the situation, so this doesn't follow from the premises of the argument. OUT

B - This actually hurts the argument! OUT

C - This is tempting too, but we already know that this DIDN'T happen. OUT

D - This is totally unrelated. OUT

E - This actually makes sense because it offers an explanation for why the restaurants are struggling despite high patronage.

- Matoo


Since that case, patronship at this and the ten other seafood restaurants in Tritonaville has remained high, and no other case of food poisoning has been documented at any of them.

some of the other seafood restaurants have experienced a severe drop in profits, so much so that one restaurant was forced to close.


How can a restaurant has high visit and is colosed at the same time?
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne