May 24 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Join a FREE 1day workshop and learn how to ace the GMAT while keeping your fulltime job. Limited for the first 99 registrants. May 25 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar and master GMAT SC in 10 days by learning how meaning and logic can help you tackle 700+ level SC questions with ease. May 27 01:00 AM PDT  11:59 PM PDT All GMAT Club Tests are free and open on May 27th for Memorial Day! May 27 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Special savings are here for Magoosh GMAT Prep! Even better  save 20% on the plan of your choice, now through midnight on Tuesday, 5/27
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 16 Jun 2008
Posts: 5

Last year, all registered voters in Kumannia voted either
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Dec 2009, 15:58
Question Stats:
38% (03:09) correct 62% (03:37) wrong based on 51 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Last year, all registered voters in Kumannia voted either for the Revolutionary Party or for the Status Quo Party. This year, the number of revolutionary voters increased 10%, while the number of Status Que voters increased 5%. No other votes were cast. If the number of total voters increased 8%, what fraction of voters voted Revolutionary this year?




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55228

Re: Kumannia
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Dec 2009, 10:39
umaa wrote: Last year, all registered voters in Kumannia voted either for the Revolutionary Party or for the Status Quo Party. This year, the number of revolutionary voters increased 10%, while the number of Status Que voters increased 5%. No other votes were cast. If the number of total voters increased 8%, what fraction of voters voted Revolutionary this year? Set the equation for the number of total voters this year: \(1.1R+1.05S=1.08(R+S)\) > \(2R=3S\) The question is \(\frac{1.1R}{1.1R+1.05S}=?\) > \(\frac{1.1R}{1.1R+1.05S}=\frac{110R}{110R+105S}\). Now, as \(2R=3S\) then \(70R=105S\) (multiplying by 35) > substitute 105S by 70R: \(\frac{110R}{110R+105S}=\frac{110R}{110R+70R}=\frac{11}{18}\) Hope it's clear.
_________________




Intern
Joined: 17 Dec 2009
Posts: 24

Re: Kumannia
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 18 Dec 2009, 08:26
Can you use the alligation method here?
If voters of the Revolutionary party increased 10% and the Status Quo Party increased 5% and the overall total votes increased 8% then the Revolutionary party accounted for 60% of the vote.
RAverageS +10 +8 +5 (2 away from mean) (3 away from mean) So
R/(R+S) = (3/5) or 60%.
Is this correct?
Originally posted by adamsmith2010 on 17 Dec 2009, 16:05.
Last edited by adamsmith2010 on 18 Dec 2009, 08:26, edited 1 time in total.



Manager
Joined: 09 May 2009
Posts: 176

Re: Kumannia
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Dec 2009, 21:07
revolutionary voter=r status quo voter=s total=t t=r+s>s=tr new r=1.1r new s=1.05s new t=1.08 t >1.1r+1.05s=1.08t >1.1r+1.05(tr)=1.08t >.05r=.03t >r=3/5t OA pls
_________________
GMAT is not a game for losers , and the moment u decide to appear for it u are no more a loser........ITS A BRAIN GAME



Intern
Joined: 16 Jun 2008
Posts: 5

Re: Kumannia
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Dec 2009, 10:07
Even I've got 60%. But the answer is 11/18.



Manager
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 163

Re: Kumannia
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Dec 2009, 10:58
11/18
1.1x+1.05y=1.08(x+y) .02x=.03y 2x=3y (thought just it out there for more visually charged people like me).
1.1x/1.1x+1.05(2/3)x (after drowning with decimals)
11/18



Manager
Joined: 24 May 2010
Posts: 75

Percents and voters
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Jul 2010, 18:55
Last year all the voters of a country voted for party A or party B. This year the number of voters voiting for A increased by 10% while the voters for party B increased by 5%. If the total number of voters increased by 8% what fraction of voters voted for party A this year.



Manager
Joined: 16 Apr 2010
Posts: 197

Re: Percents and voters
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Jul 2010, 21:08
Hi,
Let x be the percentage that voted for A and (100x) the percentage who voted for B.
we have 1.1x + 1.05(100x) = 8 Solving for x we get x = 60 (who voted for A) and (10060) who voted for B.
regards, Jack



Manager
Joined: 20 Mar 2010
Posts: 77

Re: Percents and voters
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Jul 2010, 22:39
Jinglander wrote: Last year all the voters of a country voted for party A or party B. This year the number of voters voiting for A increased by 10% while the voters for party B increased by 5%. If the total number of voters increased by 8% what fraction of voters voted for party A this year. Let a be the number of voters who voted for party A and be the number of voters who voted for party B last year. Party A  Party B  a  b < Last yr 1.1 a  1.05 b <This yr The question also states that the total voters increased by 8% this year. So 1.1a + 1.05b = 1.08(a+b) => b =(2/3)*a We need to find the fraction of voters who voted for party A this year i.e 1.1a/(1.1a + 1.05b) = 1.1a/(1.1a + 1.05*(2/3)*a) = 1.1/1.8 =11/18
_________________
___________________________________ Please give me kudos if you like my post



BSchool Thread Master
Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Posts: 334

Re: Kumannia
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Sep 2010, 09:29
Yes, 1.1/1.8 = 11/18



Intern
Affiliations: SAGAFTRA, AEA
Joined: 27 May 2011
Posts: 11
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT Date: 04202013
WE: Performing Arts (Entertainment and Sports)

Re: Kumannia
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Feb 2013, 16:00
Bunuel wrote: umaa wrote: Last year, all registered voters in Kumannia voted either for the Revolutionary Party or for the Status Quo Party. This year, the number of revolutionary voters increased 10%, while the number of Status Que voters increased 5%. No other votes were cast. If the number of total voters increased 8%, what fraction of voters voted Revolutionary this year? Set the equation for the number of total voters this year: \(1.1R+1.05S=1.08(R+S)\) > \(2R=3S\) The question is \(\frac{1.1R}{1.1R+1.05S}=?\) > \(\frac{1.1R}{1.1R+1.05S}=\frac{110R}{110R+105S}\). Now, as \(2R=3S\) then \(70R=105S\) (multiplying by 35) > substitute 105S by 70R: \(\frac{110R}{110R+105S}=\frac{110R}{110R+70R}=\frac{11}{18}\) Hope it's clear. I wish I could Kudos Bunuel's explanation a thousand times. I have found MGMAT's explanation of this problem, with their whole chart approach, almost indecipherable. Thank you for the clarity Bunuel!
_________________
"How far that little candle throws his beams. So shines a good deed in a weary world."  Shakespeare



SVP
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1660
Concentration: Finance

Re: Kumannia
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Nov 2013, 07:09
Bunuel wrote: umaa wrote: Last year, all registered voters in Kumannia voted either for the Revolutionary Party or for the Status Quo Party. This year, the number of revolutionary voters increased 10%, while the number of Status Que voters increased 5%. No other votes were cast. If the number of total voters increased 8%, what fraction of voters voted Revolutionary this year? Set the equation for the number of total voters this year: \(1.1R+1.05S=1.08(R+S)\) > \(2R=3S\) The question is \(\frac{1.1R}{1.1R+1.05S}=?\) > \(\frac{1.1R}{1.1R+1.05S}=\frac{110R}{110R+105S}\). Now, as \(2R=3S\) then \(70R=105S\) (multiplying by 35) > substitute 105S by 70R: \(\frac{110R}{110R+105S}=\frac{110R}{110R+70R}=\frac{11}{18}\) Hope it's clear. Yeah, I'm afraid I made the same mistake by using differentials we only find the ratio of votes for LAST YEAR, we are being asked something else. Agree with method by Bunuel to solve this. I think more than one got caught with the 60% Cheers! J



Intern
Joined: 06 Apr 2011
Posts: 41

Re: Kumannia
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Jan 2014, 04:56
Hi Bunuel, I have a clarification though... After we get 2R = 3S as the equation for the total voters this year, doesn't this imply R/S = 3/2 and therefore R/(R+S) = 3/5? (After all, we derived 2R = 3S considering the voters increased 10% and 5% respectively this year?) Appreciate any explanation. Bunuel wrote: Set the equation for the number of total voters this year: \(1.1R+1.05S=1.08(R+S)\) > \(2R=3S\)
The question is \(\frac{1.1R}{1.1R+1.05S}=?\) > \(\frac{1.1R}{1.1R+1.05S}=\frac{110R}{110R+105S}\). Now, as \(2R=3S\) then \(70R=105S\) (multiplying by 35) > substitute 105S by 70R: \(\frac{110R}{110R+105S}=\frac{110R}{110R+70R}=\frac{11}{18}\)
Hope it's clear.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55228

Re: Kumannia
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Jan 2014, 05:10
mniyer wrote: Hi Bunuel, I have a clarification though... After we get 2R = 3S as the equation for the total voters this year, doesn't this imply R/S = 3/2 and therefore R/(R+S) = 3/5? (After all, we derived 2R = 3S considering the voters increased 10% and 5% respectively this year?) Appreciate any explanation. Bunuel wrote: Set the equation for the number of total voters this year: \(1.1R+1.05S=1.08(R+S)\) > \(2R=3S\)
The question is \(\frac{1.1R}{1.1R+1.05S}=?\) > \(\frac{1.1R}{1.1R+1.05S}=\frac{110R}{110R+105S}\). Now, as \(2R=3S\) then \(70R=105S\) (multiplying by 35) > substitute 105S by 70R: \(\frac{110R}{110R+105S}=\frac{110R}{110R+70R}=\frac{11}{18}\)
Hope it's clear.
Yes, from \(2R=3S\) we get R/(R+S)=3/5, but notice that R and S there denote the number of voters last year.
_________________



Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 495
Location: Germany
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.88
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

Last year, all registered voters in Kumannia voted either
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Dec 2015, 04:19
mniyer wrote: Hi Bunuel, I have a clarification though... After we get 2R = 3S as the equation for the total voters this year, doesn't this imply R/S = 3/2 and therefore R/(R+S) = 3/5? (After all, we derived 2R = 3S considering the voters increased 10% and 5% respectively this year?) Appreciate any explanation. Bunuel wrote: Set the equation for the number of total voters this year: \(1.1R+1.05S=1.08(R+S)\) > \(2R=3S\)
The question is \(\frac{1.1R}{1.1R+1.05S}=?\) > \(\frac{1.1R}{1.1R+1.05S}=\frac{110R}{110R+105S}\). Now, as \(2R=3S\) then \(70R=105S\) (multiplying by 35) > substitute 105S by 70R: \(\frac{110R}{110R+105S}=\frac{110R}{110R+70R}=\frac{11}{18}\)
Hope it's clear.
As Bunuel already stated R/Total = 3/5 is a ration for the last year, for this year yoiu must do the following: Revolutionary voters: 3+10% Increase = \(3+\frac{3}{10}=\frac{33}{10}\) Total: 5 + 8% Increase = 5+0,4 = \(\frac{54}{10}\) So the fraction for this year is equal to \(\frac{33}{10}:\frac{54}{10}\) = \(\frac{33}{10}*\frac{10}{54}=\frac{11}{18}\) Hopoe it's clear now
_________________
When you’re up, your friends know who you are. When you’re down, you know who your friends are.
Share some Kudos, if my posts help you. Thank you !
800Score ONLY QUANT CAT1 51, CAT2 50, CAT3 50 GMAT PREP 670 MGMAT CAT 630 KAPLAN CAT 660



Manager
Joined: 17 Nov 2013
Posts: 83

Re: Last year, all registered voters in Kumannia voted either
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Apr 2016, 08:15
110X + 105Y = 108 (X+Y) 2X = 3Y
the question is: 110x/110x + 105y =?
if 2x = 3y => 70x = 105y when multiplied by 35.
then, 110x/(110x + 70x) = 110x/180x = 11/18



NonHuman User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 10983

Re: Last year, all registered voters in Kumannia voted either
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Aug 2018, 11:07
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________




Re: Last year, all registered voters in Kumannia voted either
[#permalink]
06 Aug 2018, 11:07






