Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack
GMAT Club

 It is currently 26 Mar 2017, 18:01

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 217
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 208 [0], given: 56

Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2012, 00:13
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

70% (01:53) correct 30% (00:48) wrong based on 364 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the current year it has been 4 percent. We can conclude that inflation is on an upward trend and the rate will be still higher next year.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion above?
(A) The inflation figures were computed on the basis of a representative sample of economic data rather than all of the available data.
(B) Last year a dip in oil prices brought inflation temporarily below its recent stable annual level of 4 percent.
(C) Increases in the pay of some workers are tied to the level of inflation, and at an inflation rate of 4 percent or above, these pay raises constitute a force causing further inflation.
(D) The 1.2 percent rate of inflation last year represented a ten-year low.
(E) Government intervention cannot affect the rate of inflation to any significant degree.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, I kinda need some =)

If you have any questions
New!
Intern
Joined: 05 Apr 2012
Posts: 23
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 12

Re: Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2012, 04:17
PUNEETSCHDV wrote:
Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the current year it has been 4 percent. We can conclude that inflation is on an upward trend and the rate will be still higher next year.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion above?
(A) The inflation figures were computed on the basis of a representative sample of economic data rather than all of the available data.
(B) Last year a dip in oil prices brought inflation temporarily below its recent stable annual level of 4 percent.
(C) Increases in the pay of some workers are tied to the level of inflation, and at an inflation rate of 4 percent or above, these pay raises constitute a force causing further inflation.
(D) The 1.2 percent rate of inflation last year represented a ten-year low.
(E) Government intervention cannot affect the rate of inflation to any significant degree.

answer is B. it clearly indicates that the situation is temporary and may not continue. hence weakening the conclusion.
Director
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 560
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 292 [1] , given: 75

Re: Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2012, 04:38
1
KUDOS
Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the current year it has been 4 percent. We can conclude that inflation is on an upward trend and the rate will be still higher next year.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion above?

We need an AC which can tell us that this increment in inflation from 1.2% to 4% will not increase further.

(A) The inflation figures were computed on the basis of a representative sample of economic data rather than all of the available data.
whatever data is taken; this AC is not weakening the conclusion.
(B) Last year a dip in oil prices brought inflation temporarily below its recent stable annual level of 4 percent.
Correct- this shows that the inflation went down to 1.2% due to oil price fall but regained to 4% , which is the stable annual rate.
(C) Increases in the pay of some workers are tied to the level of inflation, and at an inflation rate of 4 percent or above, these pay raises constitute a force causing further inflation.
not weakening;strengthening - incorrect
(D) The 1.2 percent rate of inflation last year represented a ten-year low.
doesn't signify anything about the further increase of inflation above 4%-incorrect
(E) Government intervention cannot affect the rate of inflation to any significant degree.
out of scope
_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 306
Followers: 539

Kudos [?]: 1024 [1] , given: 2

Re: Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2012, 00:15
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
The 4% is used to suggest that inflation is growing. After all, if the inflation rate was 1.2% in the previous year, then surely that must be the case. However, if the 1.2% represented a lower inflation rate than usual, then an inflation rate of 4% cannot be used as evidence that inflation is an upward trend.

(A) nails this point and elaborates even further by stating that the usual inflation rate is 4%. Therefore, an inflation rate of 4% is a return to business as usual, not a sign of an upward trend in inflation.
_________________

Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep

Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2010
Posts: 81
Schools: IIM
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 11

Re: Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2012, 01:35
The stable rate of inflation is 4%. The rate of inflation came down to 1.2% due to temporarily reduction in oil prices and it again came to 4%, so this year the rate will be 4%, not more as the stable rate is 4%.

Ans B
Manager
Status: How easy it is?
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Posts: 121
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V27
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Operations (Other)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 174

Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2013, 01:03
Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the current year it has been 4 percent. We can conclude that inflation is on upward trend and the rate will be still higher next year.

Which of the following if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion above?
A) The inflation figures were computed on the basis of a representative sample of economic data rather than all of the available data.
B) Last year the dip in oil prices brought inflation temporarily below its recent stable annual level of 4 percent.
C) Increases in the pay of some workers are tied to the level of inflation, and at an inflation rate of 4 percent or above, these pay rises constitute a force causing further inflation.
D) The 1.2 percent rate of inflation last year represented a 10 year low.
E) Government intervention cannot affect the rate of inflation to any significant change.

Please provide detailed explanations if possible.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1152
Location: United States
Followers: 266

Kudos [?]: 2966 [3] , given: 123

Re: Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2013, 01:38
3
KUDOS
nitin6305 wrote:
Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the current year it has been 4 percent. We can conclude that inflation is on upward trend and the rate will be still higher next year.

Which of the following if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion above?
A) The inflation figures were computed on the basis of a representative sample of economic data rather than all of the available data.
B) Last year the dip in oil prices brought inflation temporarily below its recent stable annual level of 4 percent.
C) Increases in the pay of some workers are tied to the level of inflation, and at an inflation rate of 4 percent or above, these pay rises constitute a force causing further inflation.
D) The 1.2 percent rate of inflation last year represented a 10 year low.
E) Government intervention cannot affect the rate of inflation to any significant change.

Please provide detailed explanations if possible.

Hi nitin

ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:

Fact: Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent,
Fact: The current year it has been 4 percent.
Conclusion: inflation is on upward trend and the rate will be still higher next year.

The question uses a popular logical fallacy: “Using several points to conclude a trend”. KEYWORD here is “upward trend”. To weaken the conclusion, you can show that the data provided in the stimulus does not represent the overall trend.

A) The inflation figures were computed on the basis of a representative sample of economic data rather than all of the available data.
Wrong. The point needs to be attacked is the result – upward trend, not the method (economic data vs all available data)

B) Last year the dip in oil prices brought inflation temporarily below its recent stable annual level of 4 percent.
Correct. Regularly, the inflation rate is 4%, last year’s inflation rate is only the temporary case. So, the comparison between last year’s inflation rate with current year’s does not reflect the overall trend. ==> Weaken the conclusion.

C) Increases in the pay of some workers are tied to the level of inflation, and at an inflation rate of 4 percent or above, these pay rises constitute a force causing further inflation.
Wrong. Out of scope because C goes too far. In addition, the key point to attack is the invalid comparison between last year’s inflation rate and current year’s.

D) The 1.2 percent rate of inflation last year represented a 10 year low.
Wrong. If it’s true, how does it weaken the conclusion. What if in the years before last year, the inflation rates were stable at 4%?.

E) Government intervention cannot affect the rate of inflation to any significant change.
Wrong. Out of scope. Nothing about “government intervention”.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Manager
Status: How easy it is?
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Posts: 121
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V27
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Operations (Other)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 174

Re: Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2013, 03:16
pqhai wrote:
nitin6305 wrote:
Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the current year it has been 4 percent. We can conclude that inflation is on upward trend and the rate will be still higher next year.

Which of the following if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion above?
A) The inflation figures were computed on the basis of a representative sample of economic data rather than all of the available data.
B) Last year the dip in oil prices brought inflation temporarily below its recent stable annual level of 4 percent.
C) Increases in the pay of some workers are tied to the level of inflation, and at an inflation rate of 4 percent or above, these pay rises constitute a force causing further inflation.
D) The 1.2 percent rate of inflation last year represented a 10 year low.
E) Government intervention cannot affect the rate of inflation to any significant change.

Please provide detailed explanations if possible.

Hi nitin

ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:

Fact: Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent,
Fact: The current year it has been 4 percent.
Conclusion: inflation is on upward trend and the rate will be still higher next year.

The question uses a popular logical fallacy: “Using several points to conclude a trend”. KEYWORD here is “upward trend”. To weaken the conclusion, you can show that the data provided in the stimulus does not represent the overall trend.

A) The inflation figures were computed on the basis of a representative sample of economic data rather than all of the available data.
Wrong. The point needs to be attacked is the result – upward trend, not the method (economic data vs all available data)

B) Last year the dip in oil prices brought inflation temporarily below its recent stable annual level of 4 percent.
Correct. Regularly, the inflation rate is 4%, last year’s inflation rate is only the temporary case. So, the comparison between last year’s inflation rate with current year’s does not reflect the overall trend. ==> Weaken the conclusion.

C) Increases in the pay of some workers are tied to the level of inflation, and at an inflation rate of 4 percent or above, these pay rises constitute a force causing further inflation.
Wrong. Out of scope because C goes too far. In addition, the key point to attack is the invalid comparison between last year’s inflation rate and current year’s.

D) The 1.2 percent rate of inflation last year represented a 10 year low.
Wrong. If it’s true, how does it weaken the conclusion. What if in the years before last year, the inflation rates were stable at 4%?.

E) Government intervention cannot affect the rate of inflation to any significant change.
Wrong. Out of scope. Nothing about “government intervention”.

Hope it helps.

I almost understood the reasoning completely.
My only doubt is with option D, " if all the years before last year the rate of inflation was more than 1.2% or lets say if it was stable 4%, and it dropped to 1.2% for just one year. Subsequently, the rate became stable again as 4% , so doesn't it mean that there is no upward trend ?"
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1152
Location: United States
Followers: 266

Kudos [?]: 2966 [1] , given: 123

Re: Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2013, 09:50
1
KUDOS
nitin6305 wrote:
I almost understood the reasoning completely.
My only doubt is with option D, " if all the years before last year the rate of inflation was more than 1.2% or lets say if it was stable 4%, and it dropped to 1.2% for just one year. Subsequently, the rate became stable again as 4% , so doesn't it mean that there is no upward trend ?"

Hi nitin

You have a very good question.

There would be no upward trend, if only last year inflation rate dropped to 1.2%. Because:

(1) The conclusion is " inflation is on upward trend and the rate will be still higher next year". If the next year the inflation rate will be stable at 4%, you CANNOT conclude that the inflation is on upward trend, and the rate will be still higher.

(2) If you base only on data of two years (last year and current year) to conclude the upward trend, why don't you conclude the downward trend for the last year and the year before last year (4% ==> 2%). Hence, your conclusion is not strong enough to conclude the inflation is on upward trend.

Hope it's clear.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Intern
Joined: 07 Jan 2013
Posts: 43
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 570 Q46 V23
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 2.9
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 23

Re: Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2013, 19:51
nitin6305 wrote:
pqhai wrote:
nitin6305 wrote:
Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the current year it has been 4 percent. We can conclude that inflation is on upward trend and the rate will be still higher next year.

Which of the following if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion above?
A) The inflation figures were computed on the basis of a representative sample of economic data rather than all of the available data.
B) Last year the dip in oil prices brought inflation temporarily below its recent stable annual level of 4 percent.
C) Increases in the pay of some workers are tied to the level of inflation, and at an inflation rate of 4 percent or above, these pay rises constitute a force causing further inflation.
D) The 1.2 percent rate of inflation last year represented a 10 year low.
E) Government intervention cannot affect the rate of inflation to any significant change.

Please provide detailed explanations if possible.

Hi nitin

ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:

Fact: Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent,
Fact: The current year it has been 4 percent.
Conclusion: inflation is on upward trend and the rate will be still higher next year.

The question uses a popular logical fallacy: “Using several points to conclude a trend”. KEYWORD here is “upward trend”. To weaken the conclusion, you can show that the data provided in the stimulus does not represent the overall trend.

A) The inflation figures were computed on the basis of a representative sample of economic data rather than all of the available data.
Wrong. The point needs to be attacked is the result – upward trend, not the method (economic data vs all available data)

B) Last year the dip in oil prices brought inflation temporarily below its recent stable annual level of 4 percent.
Correct. Regularly, the inflation rate is 4%, last year’s inflation rate is only the temporary case. So, the comparison between last year’s inflation rate with current year’s does not reflect the overall trend. ==> Weaken the conclusion.

C) Increases in the pay of some workers are tied to the level of inflation, and at an inflation rate of 4 percent or above, these pay rises constitute a force causing further inflation.
Wrong. Out of scope because C goes too far. In addition, the key point to attack is the invalid comparison between last year’s inflation rate and current year’s.

D) The 1.2 percent rate of inflation last year represented a 10 year low.
Wrong. If it’s true, how does it weaken the conclusion. What if in the years before last year, the inflation rates were stable at 4%?.

E) Government intervention cannot affect the rate of inflation to any significant change.
Wrong. Out of scope. Nothing about “government intervention”.

Hope it helps.

I almost understood the reasoning completely.
My only doubt is with option D, " if all the years before last year the rate of inflation was more than 1.2% or lets say if it was stable 4%, and it dropped to 1.2% for just one year. Subsequently, the rate became stable again as 4% , so doesn't it mean that there is no upward trend ?"

the same doubt has come across me
_________________

Intern
Joined: 07 Jan 2013
Posts: 43
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 570 Q46 V23
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 2.9
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 23

Re: Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2013, 19:55
pqhai wrote:
nitin6305 wrote:
I almost understood the reasoning completely.
My only doubt is with option D, " if all the years before last year the rate of inflation was more than 1.2% or lets say if it was stable 4%, and it dropped to 1.2% for just one year. Subsequently, the rate became stable again as 4% , so doesn't it mean that there is no upward trend ?"

Hi nitin

You have a very good question.

There would be no upward trend, if only last year inflation rate dropped to 1.2%. Because:

(1) The conclusion is " inflation is on upward trend and the rate will be still higher next year". If the next year the inflation rate will be stable at 4%, you CANNOT conclude that the inflation is on upward trend, and the rate will be still higher.

(2) If you base only on data of two years (last year and current year) to conclude the upward trend, why don't you conclude the downward trend for the last year and the year before last year (4% ==> 2%). Hence, your conclusion is not strong enough to conclude the inflation is on upward trend.

Hope it's clear.

If you base only on data of two years (last year and current year) to conclude the upward trend, why don't you conclude the downward trend for the last year and the year before last year (4% ==> 2%). Hence, your conclusion is not strong enough to conclude the inflation is on upward trend.

doesnt this mean it is also actually weakining the conclusion of upward trend
_________________

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1152
Location: United States
Followers: 266

Kudos [?]: 2966 [1] , given: 123

Re: Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2013, 22:34
1
KUDOS
pqhai wrote:
nitin6305 wrote:
I almost understood the reasoning completely.
My only doubt is with option D, " if all the years before last year the rate of inflation was more than 1.2% or lets say if it was stable 4%, and it dropped to 1.2% for just one year. Subsequently, the rate became stable again as 4% , so doesn't it mean that there is no upward trend ?"

Hi nitin

You have a very good question.

There would be no upward trend, if only last year inflation rate dropped to 1.2%. Because:

(1) The conclusion is " inflation is on upward trend and the rate will be still higher next year". If the next year the inflation rate will be stable at 4%, you CANNOT conclude that the inflation is on upward trend, and the rate will be still higher.

(2) If you base only on data of two years (last year and current year) to conclude the upward trend, why don't you conclude the downward trend for the last year and the year before last year (4% ==> 2%). Hence, your conclusion is not strong enough to conclude the inflation is on upward trend.

Hope it's clear.

If you base only on data of two years (last year and current year) to conclude the upward trend, why don't you conclude the downward trend for the last year and the year before last year (4% ==> 2%). Hence, your conclusion is not strong enough to conclude the inflation is on upward trend.

doesnt this mean it is also actually weakining the conclusion of upward trend

This is just an example I used to clarify nitin's doubt about option D. Before answer your question, I just want to clarify D a bit.

D says: "The 1.2 percent rate of inflation last year represented a ten-year low".
Thus, the inflation rates pattern should be: HIGH (the year before last year) ==> LOW (last year) ==> HIGH (current year).

I used my example to show: if we use only data from last year to current year to conclude inflation is on upward trend ==> we could be wrong. Because if we use data from the year before last year to last year ==> we can also conclude inflation is on downward trend.

Your question is: does the second part (conclusion about downward trend) actually weaken the main conclusion? If it does, D may be right?

I would say no, the second part of my example just shows the comparison used in the stimulus is invalid. Because if can say the inflation is on upward by using only data of two years, we can also conclude the inflation is on downward by using data from other two years. The reverse pattern is also true, if we use only data from two years to conclude inflation is on downward (It is your inquiry), we can also use data from last year to current year to weaken the "new" conclusion (inflation is on downward). In short, D is not strong enough to weaken the main conclusion, because it's half right, half wrong.

_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3152
Followers: 821

Kudos [?]: 6927 [0], given: 1051

Re: Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2013, 13:44
I wuold like to know the level of this one.

Just for tag: other threads say sub 400 level but I do not think so

Opinions ??'

for me is correct the tag
_________________
Manager
Joined: 30 May 2013
Posts: 190
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GPA: 3.82
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 72

Re: Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Apr 2014, 07:53
PUNEETSCHDV wrote:
Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the current year it has been 4 percent. We can conclude that inflation is on an upward trend and the rate will be still higher next year.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion above?
(A) The inflation figures were computed on the basis of a representative sample of economic data rather than all of the available data.
(B) Last year a dip in oil prices brought inflation temporarily below its recent stable annual level of 4 percent.
(C) Increases in the pay of some workers are tied to the level of inflation, and at an inflation rate of 4 percent or above, these pay raises constitute a force causing further inflation.
(D) The 1.2 percent rate of inflation last year represented a ten-year low.
(E) Government intervention cannot affect the rate of inflation to any significant degree.

I will try explaining this one!!!!

Conclusion: inflation is on an upward trend and the rate will be still higher next year.

Assumption: Inflation will always have a pattern
There are no unusual things happened to say that inflation rate will change

(A) The inflation figures were computed on the basis of a representative sample of economic data rather than all of the available data. - Irrelevant information
(B) Last year a dip in oil prices brought inflation temporarily below its recent stable annual level of 4 percent. - Weakener Says that Last year dip in Oil price brought the inflation down to 1.2 from stable point of 4. So same stable inflation point will be maintained unless there is no unusual dip in oil price, or....
(C) Increases in the pay of some workers are tied to the level of inflation, and at an inflation rate of 4 percent or above, these pay raises constitute a force causing further inflation. - No point to say there will be increase in the Pay next year
(D) The 1.2 percent rate of inflation last year represented a ten-year low. - irrelevant - 10 years low inflation says nothing about the next year rate of inflation
(E) Government intervention cannot affect the rate of inflation to any significant degree - Again this has nothing to do with the next year inflation rate

Correct me if i am wrong.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10676
Followers: 958

Kudos [?]: 214 [0], given: 0

Re: Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2015, 11:09
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the   [#permalink] 21 Sep 2015, 11:09
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
10 RAGCT 2015 Day 12: Last year a woman was able to demonstrate 20 28 Jul 2015, 10:34
Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the 0 02 Jul 2013, 01:03
11 Last year the rate of in ation was 1.2 percent, but for the 11 27 Feb 2010, 00:27
Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2%, but during the 3 29 Sep 2008, 16:17
When the rate of inflation exceeds the rate of return on the 7 04 Apr 2007, 04:54
Display posts from previous: Sort by