It is currently 26 Jun 2017, 12:00

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both publi

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 165
Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both publi [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2009, 21:13
26
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

85% (hard)

Question Stats:

43% (01:59) correct 57% (01:11) wrong based on 768 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both public and private employers that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are usually held by men.

(A) that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are
(B) that pay for jobs historically held by women should be the same as for a job requiring comparable skills
(C) to pay the same in jobs historically held by women as in jobs of comparable skill that are
(D) to pay the same regardless of whether a job was historically held by women or is one demanding comparable skills
(E) to pay as much for jobs historically held by women as for a job demanding comparable skills
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Manager
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 208
Re: Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both publi [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jul 2009, 01:05
2
KUDOS
ugimba wrote:
sanoasis wrote:
３． Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both public and private employers that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are usually held by men.

(A) that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are
(B) that pay for jobs historically held by women should be the same as for a job requiring comparable skills
(C) to pay the same in jobs historically held by women as in jobs of comparable skill that are
(D) to pay the same regardless of whether a job was historically held by women or is one demanding comparable skills
(E) to pay as much for jobs historically held by women as for a job demanding comparable skills

requires that ... subjunctive mood..

IMO A

Here is an excellent thread on subjunctive constructs.

subjunctive-and-use-of-that-with-simple-verb-form-79606.html

It is not essential that "that" appear in subjunctive.
_________________

-talent is the desire to practice-

Intern
Joined: 23 Aug 2009
Posts: 47
Re: Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both publi [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2009, 11:42
imo A
.... as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are... - so that clearly refers to jobs (not to singular skill)
that doesn’t need to touch the noun it refers
Manager
Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Posts: 100
Re: Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both publi [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2009, 17:40
1
KUDOS
３． Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both public and private employers that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are usually held by men.

(A) that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are
(B) that pay for jobs historically held by women should be the same as for a job requiring comparable skills
(C) to pay the same in jobs historically held by women as in jobs of comparable skill that are
(D) to pay the same regardless of whether a job was historically held by women or is one demanding comparable skills
(E) to pay as much for jobs historically held by women as for a job demanding comparable skills

B - require ... that ... should - incorrect
C - pay in - not a correct idiom, should be pay for
D - awkward structure - a job was ... or is one (job) ...
E - jobs vs job
Manager
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 193
Re: Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both publi [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jan 2010, 13:24
oh boy! I kept spinning wheels with E; need to understand subjunctive mood better...

Some good resources

http://www.ceafinney.com/subjunctive/guide.html
http://www.ceafinney.com/subjunctive/examples.html

but I think key words are contradiction, wish or mandate perhaps should do the trick...

who says GMAT does not judge vocabulary but grammer only...!
Intern
Joined: 08 Jan 2010
Posts: 1
Re: Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both publi [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jan 2010, 03:03
Shouldn't it be:
legislation ...requires ... employers .. TO PAY as much for jobs.

As opposed to:

Legislation ...requires ...employers .. THAT PAY be the same for jobs.

When do we use an infinitive, and when do we use a subordinate?

Posted from my mobile device
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 348
Location: San Francisco
Re: Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both publi [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Apr 2010, 12:02
27
KUDOS
18
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Hey All,

A lot of conversation here, but no one has yet really gone through it piece by piece and explained what the heck is going on. I'll be that guy!

The verb "to require" can function in two ways. The first is passive: "Something is required TO do something". In this format, we have the passive voice of required. You can't go active (It's not allowed to say "He requires you to do something."), and you have to use the infinitive form of the subordinate verb. THE OTHER version of the verb "to require" is active, and forms the subjunctive of demand (We call them bossy verbs). Bossy verbs always form the same way:

BOSSY VERB CONSTRUCTION: HE demanded THAT Sheila dance.
subject normal verb always have "that" Object verb in the subjunctive

The verb in the subjunctive may be tough to recognize. However, the typical present tense form that goes with the subject "Sheila" is "dances". The subjunctive is generally formed by taking the infinitive form of the verb ("to dance") and removing the "to".

Okay. Now let's look at the question.

３． Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both public and private employers that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are usually held by men.

(A) that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are
ANSWER: Here we have "requires" in the active voice, so we need the bossy verb construction. We get the THAT we need, then the object "pay", then the subjunctive form "be" (it's the infinitive "to be" without the "to"). Looks good!

(B) that pay for jobs historically held by women should be the same as for a job requiring comparable skills
PROBLEM: YOU NEVER USE SHOULD in a subjunctive construction. In fact, should gets used SO OFTEN in these types of questions, that it's worth noticing it in all the sentences you look at. Often, it signals a bossy verb subjunctive construction that you might not have noticed otherwise!

(C) to pay the same in jobs historically held by women as in jobs of comparable skill that are
PROBLEM: The "to" is wrong for the subjunctive construction. Also "in jobs" is an incorrect idiom. It should be "for jobs".

(D) to pay the same regardless of whether a job was historically held by women or is one demanding comparable skills
PROBLEM: The "to" is wrong for the subjunctive construction. Also the parallelism is wrong. The wrong two things are being compared.

(E) to pay as much for jobs historically held by women as for a job demanding comparable skills
PROBLEM: The "to" is wrong for the subjunctive construction. "Jobs" and "a job" aren't parallel.

Hope that helps!

-t
_________________

Tommy Wallach | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | San Francisco

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Manager
Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 215
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Re: Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both publi [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Apr 2010, 06:24
Tommy, according to MGMAT SC. I thought "require" is one of those verbs that can take EITHER command subjunctive or the Infinitive.

We require that he be here
We require him to be here

I believe both are correct?
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 348
Location: San Francisco
Re: Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both publi [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Apr 2010, 14:28
Hey Lonewolf,

This is a tough one. You're absolutely right that the MGMAT SC Guide states as a correct sentence: "She requires that her friend do work." I feel certain that this construction is not used anymore, though it still may be considered grammatically correct. I'll have to ask around. However, I did say in my explanation that "require" can be used both ways. I merely specified that we don't use the subjunctive format transitively anymore (transitively = with a direct object).

"We require that he be here" is not correct in my opinion, because you can't put an active subject in front of the the verb when used in the subjunctive. "It is required that he be here" is correct, but I don't believe I can "require that you be somewhere".

"We require him to be here" is entirely correct as is.

I will check on this difference, because I wouldn't want to steer you wrong.

-tommy
_________________

Tommy Wallach | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | San Francisco

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Manhattan GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 348
Location: San Francisco
Re: Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both publi [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Apr 2010, 12:28
Hey Lonewolf,

So I've done my research, and yes, that version IS considered okay: "I require that you be here". Darnit! : )

It doesn't change the answer, however, or my explanation. Can I help further?

-tommy
_________________

Tommy Wallach | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | San Francisco

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

VP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1491
Re: Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both publi [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Apr 2010, 14:41
Hey Tommy, your explanation for option (D)

(D) to pay the same regardless of whether a job was historically held by women or is one demanding comparable skills
PROBLEM: The "to" is wrong for the subjunctive construction. Also the parallelism is wrong. The wrong two things are being compared.

I understood the "to" part but I did not understand how two wrong things are compared. I thought the comparison is between a job and a job. please explain

"pay the same regardless of whether a job was historically held by women or is one (a job) demanding comparaing skills that are usually held by men"
Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 167
Re: Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both publi [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jun 2010, 01:08
I was confused between A and C.

(A) that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are - Seemed right at the first go but then I was confused as to whether "that" here is referring to "skill" or "jobs". A second thought made me realize that "that" is followed by "are" and so it has to refer to jobs and not skill.

(C) to pay the same in jobs historically held by women as in jobs of comparable skill that are - is the use of "in" incorrect here?
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Nov 2005
Posts: 384
Location: Chicago, IL
Re: Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both publi [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2010, 07:28
３． Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both public and private employers that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are usually held by men.

(A) [color=#4000FF]that
pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are
Correct-subjunctive mood, parralellism:jobs//jobs, "that" correctly modifies jobs.
(B) that pay for jobs historically held by women should be the same as for a job requiring comparable skills
(C) to pay the same in jobs historically held by women as in jobs of comparable skill that are correct wording is to pay for jobs vs. to pay in jobs
(D) to pay the same regardless of whether a job was historically held by women or is one demanding comparable skills. jobs are held by women, not a job. not parrallel. .... whether a job was historically held by women or demands comparable skills would be correct as "is" is parralel to demands. In D, "that" modifies rather skills, so it changes the meaning slighly.
(E) to pay as much for jobs historically held by women as for a job demanding comparable skills [/color]
a job is not parralell to jobs.
_________________

Hard work is the main determinant of success

Intern
Status: fighting hard..
Joined: 12 Jul 2010
Posts: 27
Schools: ISB, Hass, Ross, NYU Stern
Re: Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both publi [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Aug 2010, 14:36
if you were wondering, what does Natia's signature line, 'Las cualidades del agua...porque el agua no olvida que su destino es el mar, y que tarde o temprano deberá llegar a él', mean...

Here it is...
The qualities of the water ... because the water does not forget that their destination is the sea, and that sooner or later it must be reached.
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 244
Re: Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both publi [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Nov 2010, 20:55
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Hey ajit,

Great question - and I think that this one is a prime candidate for what I call the Slash-and-Burn technique for streamlining sentences. The sentence begins with two modifiers before the underlined:

"in the Canadian province of Ontario" and "of both public and private employers" both describe the words before them ("legislation", the subject; and "requires", the verb). If you remove them to read the sentence in a simpler form, you have:

Legislation requires that... (A and B)

or

Legislation requires to pay... (C, D, E)

A and B have it - "legislation requires that" is correct, whereas "legislation requires to pay" doesn't have a proper subject for "to pay".

Between those two, we know that we have a comparison being drawn, so the most likely decision point is going to be a proper, parallel comparison.

A compares "the same for jobs held by women" and "as for jobs requiring..."

It correctly compares "jobs" to "jobs" and has the appropriate paralllel form of "for" in front of both.

B compares "jobs" to "a job", which isn't perfectly parallel. And it also adds the unnecessary word "should" in there ("require" means "must", so "should" just confuses the meaning). Therefore B is wrong and A is the correct answer.

I hope that helps...
_________________

Brian

Save \$100 on live Veritas Prep GMAT Courses and Admissions Consulting

Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

Intern
Joined: 08 Aug 2010
Posts: 23
Re: Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both publi [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Dec 2010, 02:38
Will go with A.

A - requires that and then simple form (be). Also, for ...for is parallel
B- require and should doesn't go hand in hand -so, its redundant.

----
+1 if you like the post!
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3972
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both publi [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Dec 2010, 03:57
IMO, this text is a test of parallelism and idiom. Only A maintains both by using the comparative phrase ‘for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring’. A is the right answer

No other choice flaunts an equitable comparison, B and E compare ‘jobs’ with ‘a job’

C uses an odd and unidiomatic ‘to pay the same in the jobs ‘
D compares ‘past tense’ with ‘present tense’
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Senior Manager
Status: Can't give up
Joined: 20 Dec 2009
Posts: 311
Re: Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both publi [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Dec 2010, 09:17
This is how I tackled (took a lot of time )
there are two idioms tested here 1) requires of x that y 2) same as (this is one of the "Comparison" types requires...same....as)

A does that job well.

Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both public and private employers that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are usually held by men.

(A) that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are
(B) that pay for jobs historically held by women should be the same as for a job requiring comparable skills - missing the comparison
(C) to pay the same in jobs historically held by women as in jobs of comparable skill that are - "to pay" out
(D) to pay the same regardless of whether a job was historically held by women or is one demanding comparable skills - same as C
(E) to pay as much for jobs historically held by women as for a job demanding comparable skills - same as D
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 244
Re: Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both publi [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Dec 2010, 11:19
1
KUDOS
Good question, Rajen - if we take out the modifying phrases and whittle down to just "legislation requires to pay", there isn't any indication of WHOM is required to pay. The legislation surely isn't paying. For demands like "require", there needs to be an object of that verb that then does something else. You could say:

The law requires employers to pay

or

The law requires that employers pay

but in either case you need to have "employers" (or another appropriate noun) clearly set up as the object of the requirement and the subject of the verb "pay".

The modifying phrase "of both public and private employers" puts "employers" as a description but not as a subject/object. Because of that preposition "of", we can ignore that phrase to closer link the subject, verb, and object - and in doing so we realize that without a clear noun for the verb "to pay", the sentence is incomplete.

Without the phrase "of", "to pay" could work: Legislation requires both public and private employers to pay...

But the word "of" makes that noun "employers" part of a modifier and not a standalone object-of-"require" / subject-of-"to pay", and so therefore C/D/E are all incorrect.
_________________

Brian

Save \$100 on live Veritas Prep GMAT Courses and Admissions Consulting

Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

Manager
Joined: 07 Oct 2010
Posts: 177
Re: Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both publi [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Dec 2010, 11:53
This sentence has subjunctive mood
It is because the Legislation desires its people to pay same for the jobs but there is degree of uncertainty as to whether or not people actually follow the law.

Therefore, both public and private employers that pay.... is correct. Here we have to use
"that + infinitive form"(without "to")

So, we can neglect choices C, D, and E.

Now between A and B ... A has valid comparison .... therefore answer will be A

Consider giving me KUDOS if this post helps you
Re: Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both publi   [#permalink] 01 Dec 2010, 11:53

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 47 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
*700* Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both 0 15 May 2016, 03:09
5 Both threatened by the possibility of legislation ... 12 07 Nov 2013, 01:15
Both threatened by the possibility of legislation 0 18 Apr 2013, 22:54
Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of 0 10 Mar 2017, 04:20
Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of 0 14 Mar 2017, 04:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both publi

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.