powellmittra wrote:
rishabchoraria wrote:
I picked A. But cannot figure why C would be wrong. Anyone who would like to take a dig at C?
Hello
rishabchorariaI can't find rule but I see some pattern:
If we have subject pronoun (I, you, he, she...) we should use "require that":
We require THAT
HE BE here.
She required that
everyone attend
The law now requires that
parents serve on the committees that plan and evaluate school programs...
And if we have object pronoun (him, them) we should used "required to":
We require
HIM TO BE here
The rules also require
employers to provide safety training...
All
candidates will be required to take a short test.
So it looks like in variant A we have word
pay as a noun
Legislation requires employers that pay be --> This is first type of construction and
pay is subject pronun so
require that is correct
And in variant C we have word
pay as a verb
Legislation requires employers to pay the same --> This is second type of construction and
employers is object pronoun so
require to is correct
If these pattern is correct then
require that/require to in this question is a false split and only difference is "pay the same
in jobs"
I again can't find the rule but think that
pay in jobs is incorrect idiom.
Please note the following usages:
1. Require someone to do something: correct
2. Require OF someone to do something: wrong
3. Require OF someone that ...
command subjunctive...: correct
4. Require OF someone that ..
should... : wrong
someone =
both public and private employerssomething =
paycommand subjunctive:
be Because of 2 above, C, D and E are wrong.
Because of 4 above B is wrong.
A is correct: it adheres to 3 above.
Value your opinion. Can help, please?