It is currently 17 Nov 2017, 16:19

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# legislator

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 22 Apr 2004
Posts: 156

Kudos [?]: 123 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Aug 2005, 09:54
Editorial: This political party has repeatedly expressed the view that increased spending on education is a worthy goal. On other occasions, however, the same party has claimed that the government should not increase spending on education. So this party's policy is clearly inconsistent.

The argument in editorial depends on assuming which of following:
(a) It is inconsistent for a legislator both to claim that increasing spending on education is a worthy goal and to vote agst increasing spending on education
(b) A consistent course of action in educational policy is usually the best course of action that will reduce spending on education in the long run
(c) Even if a goal is morally good one, one should not necessarily try to achieve it
(d) A consistent political policy does not hold that an action that comprises a worthy goal should not be performed
(e) Members of one political party never have inconsistent views on how to best approach a political issue.

Last edited by ronybtl on 04 Nov 2005, 06:28, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 123 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5032

Kudos [?]: 452 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

29 Aug 2005, 10:04
The editorial is aruging that the party has expressed that increased spending on education is a worthy goal, but it is inconsistent by claiming that the government should not increase spending on education.

This is based on the assumption that a legislator must do what he claims is worthy. This is stated in (A).

(B) is out of scope
(C) is not the assumption, but someting that weakens the editorial's stand
(D) if true, would debunk the conclusion of the editorial since it says it is entirely consistent for a party to say one thing and do another
(E) out of scope as this is not about how to appraoch, but whether the party is being consistent or not in their belief and their stance

A for me.

Kudos [?]: 452 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1706

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Aug 2005, 10:06
A too.

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 01 Jun 2005
Posts: 69

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Aug 2005, 10:13
I will go with A.

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 329

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 12

### Show Tags

29 Aug 2005, 10:32
A.

GA

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 12

Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Posts: 197

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Location: Ghana

### Show Tags

29 Aug 2005, 11:16
A for me.
_________________

It's not over until it's OVER!

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 716

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Aug 2005, 11:25
A looks fine..

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2005
Posts: 163

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Location: Atlanta , GA

### Show Tags

29 Aug 2005, 11:30
A for me too

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 211

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Aug 2005, 11:36
'A'

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Aug 2005, 17:55
A.

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 286

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Aug 2005, 18:15
One more for A.

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 07 Jun 2005
Posts: 90

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2005, 03:27
Another A here too

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 22 Apr 2004
Posts: 156

Kudos [?]: 123 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2005, 07:39
The OA is D.

I chose A and am puzzled why that was incorrect. Does anyone know the answer?

Kudos [?]: 123 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 329

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 12

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2005, 03:42
Rony,

Do you think there cud have been a typo in D? Shud it be inconsistent instead of consistent?

source of the qn if I may?

GA

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 12

Manager
Joined: 22 Apr 2004
Posts: 156

Kudos [?]: 123 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2005, 17:32
Gandy: Have checked and have amended answer choice D. Inserted a "not" after "to be performed". Apologies for that.

The qn from from LSAT Oct 2000 official guide Section 1 qn 23 .

Last edited by ronybtl on 04 Nov 2005, 06:28, edited 2 times in total.

Kudos [?]: 123 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 402

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2005, 18:13
I pick D. If this is right, I will explain later.

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

03 Nov 2005, 18:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by