GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 16 Feb 2019, 00:14

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in February
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272812
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

February 16, 2019

February 16, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.
• ### Free GMAT Algebra Webinar

February 17, 2019

February 17, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Attend this Free Algebra Webinar and learn how to master Inequalities and Absolute Value problems on GMAT.

# Lobsters and other crustaceans eaten by humans--Source: Powerscore CR

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 17 Oct 2015
Posts: 106
Location: India
Concentration: Finance
Schools: ISB '18 (S)
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 2: 700 Q44 V41
WE: Corporate Finance (Commercial Banking)
Lobsters and other crustaceans eaten by humans--Source: Powerscore CR  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2016, 11:09
1
12
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

39% (01:50) correct 61% (02:08) wrong based on 447 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Lobsters and other crustaceans eaten by humans are more likely to contract gill diseases when sewage contaminates their water. Under a recent proposal, millions of gallons of local sewage each day would be rerouted many kilometers offshore. Although, this would substantially reduce the amount of sewage in the harbor where lobsters are caught, the proposal is pointless, because hardly any lobsters live long enough to be harmed by those diseases.

Which one of the following if true most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) Contaminants in the harbor other than sewage are equally harmful to lobsters.
(B) Lobsters, like other crustaceans, live longer in the open ocean than in industrial harbors.
(C) Lobsters breed as readily in sewage contaminated water as in unpolluted water.
(D) Gill diseases cannot be detected by examining the surface of the lobsters.
(E) Humans often become ill as a result of eating lobsters with gill diseases.

Source : PowerScore
Source : LSAT PrepTest35 Q8
Manager
Status: Build your own dreams,Otherwise some one else will hire you to build there's.
Joined: 30 Apr 2015
Posts: 88
Location: India
Concentration: Finance
Schools: BYU-Marriott'18
GMAT 1: 590 Q45 V26
GMAT 2: 660 Q47 V34
GPA: 3.68
Re: Lobsters and other crustaceans eaten by humans--Source: Powerscore CR  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2016, 05:26
_________________

-Dori Roberts

Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2013
Posts: 290
GMAT 1: 690 Q45 V39
WE: General Management (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Lobsters and other crustaceans eaten by humans--Source: Powerscore CR  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2016, 05:49
3
mahakmalik wrote:

Lobsters and other crustaceans eaten by humans are more likely to contract gill diseases when sewage contaminates their water. Under a recent proposal, millions of gallons of local sewage each day would be rerouted many kilometers offshore. Although, this would substantially reduce the amount of sewage in the harbor where lobsters are caught, the proposal is pointless, because hardly any lobsters live long enough to be harmed by those diseases.

Which one of the following if true most seriously weakens the argument?

A> Contaminants in the harbor other than sewage are equally harmful to lobsters.
B> Lobsters, like other crustaceans, live longer in the open ocean than in industrial harbors.
C> Lobsters breed as readily in sewage contaminated water as in unpolluted water.
D> Gill diseases cannot be detected by examining the surface of the lobsters.
E> Humans often become ill as a result of eating lobsters with gill diseases.

Conclusion- the proposal is pointless .
The argument cites a reason why the proposal is pointless -because hardly any lobsters live long enough to be harmed by those diseases.

Now in order to weaken the argument we need to cast doubt on the conclusion with some new information.
Option E provides us with that extra information that we need to cast doubt on the conclusion.
Option E provides a reasoning why the proposal may not be pointless.
Perhaps the author must consider other ideas such as E before stating that the proposal is pointless.

B is of the topic because the point in question is not about the life length of the lobsters but about why the proposal may not be pointless.

E states that perhaps the proposal is not all pointless.

Hope the above helps.

Kudos if you find the above useful.
_________________

Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is always to try just one more time.

I hated every minute of training, but I said, 'Don't quit. Suffer now and live the rest of your life as a champion.-Mohammad Ali

Manager
Status: Build your own dreams,Otherwise some one else will hire you to build there's.
Joined: 30 Apr 2015
Posts: 88
Location: India
Concentration: Finance
Schools: BYU-Marriott'18
GMAT 1: 590 Q45 V26
GMAT 2: 660 Q47 V34
GPA: 3.68
Re: Lobsters and other crustaceans eaten by humans--Source: Powerscore CR  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2016, 06:20
1
Ohk,
I thought,if lobsters will not get the disease because they do not live long enough.Then how will humans get the disease by eating the lobster.?

I am still confused.
_________________

-Dori Roberts

Manager
Joined: 17 Oct 2015
Posts: 106
Location: India
Concentration: Finance
Schools: ISB '18 (S)
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 2: 700 Q44 V41
WE: Corporate Finance (Commercial Banking)
Re: Lobsters and other crustaceans eaten by humans--Source: Powerscore CR  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Feb 2016, 13:34
3
1
Hello mahakmalik,

Lets see the argument that we have to weaken:

Although, this would substantially reduce the amount of sewage in the harbor where lobsters are caught, the proposal is pointless, because hardly any lobsters live long enough to be harmed by those diseases.

we have following options here:

A> Contaminants in the harbor other than sewage are equally harmful to lobsters.
Out of scope, as we are talking about the contaminants in sewage only

B> Lobsters, like other crustaceans, live longer in the open ocean than in industrial harbors.
This is a tricky one. Prima facie a contender..but major flaw is:
In question we are talking about Harbor Industrial or otherwise we dont know..it could be either.. In these questions you just cant assume things.

C> Lobsters breed as readily in sewage contaminated water as in unpolluted water.
Breeding has nothing to do with longevity of life. so you'd want to skip this

D> Gill diseases cannot be detected by examining the surface of the lobsters.
Out of scope

E> Humans often become ill as a result of eating lobsters with gill diseases.
YES,, this is the point. See this doesn't tell us whether lobsters live longer.. but it does tell thatpeople are getting sick because of eating lobsters from harbor where sewage is dumped..so it does imply sewage water affects the lobsters in bad way (as a resutlt affecting humans also) and thus rerouting DOES have a point and is not just a pointless decision.

CR is cruel. HOPE THIS HELPS
Manager
Status: Build your own dreams,Otherwise some one else will hire you to build there's.
Joined: 30 Apr 2015
Posts: 88
Location: India
Concentration: Finance
Schools: BYU-Marriott'18
GMAT 1: 590 Q45 V26
GMAT 2: 660 Q47 V34
GPA: 3.68
Re: Lobsters and other crustaceans eaten by humans--Source: Powerscore CR  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Feb 2016, 17:11
Thanks.It surly does help
CR is very very cruel.
_________________

-Dori Roberts

Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1321
Location: Malaysia
Lobsters and other crustaceans eaten by humans--Source: Powerscore CR  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2017, 00:01
2
Youraisemeup wrote:
Lobsters and other crustaceans eaten by humans are more likely to contract gill diseases when sewage contaminates their water. Under a recent proposal, millions of gallons of local sewage each day would be rerouted many kilometers offshore. Although, this would substantially reduce the amount of sewage in the harbor where lobsters are caught, the proposal is pointless, because hardly any lobsters live long enough to be harmed by those diseases.

Which one of the following if true most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) Contaminants in the harbor other than sewage are equally harmful to lobsters.
(B) Lobsters, like other crustaceans, live longer in the open ocean than in industrial harbors.
(C) Lobsters breed as readily in sewage contaminated water as in unpolluted water.
(D) Gill diseases cannot be detected by examining the surface of the lobsters.
(E) Humans often become ill as a result of eating lobsters with gill diseases.

Source : PowerScore
Source : LSAT PrepTest35 Q8

KAPLAN OFFICIAL EXPLANATION

Weaken the Argument

Weakens” signals the need to identify evidence and conclusion and to drive a wedge between them. “The proposal is pointless” should practically scream “I am the conclusion,” since such a value judgment cannot stand without supporting evidence. The proposal is to reduce local sewage so as to protect lobsters against gill diseases, and the alleged “pointlessness” stems from the brief lobster lifespan, too brief for the creatures “to be harmed by those diseases.” Of course, the proposal gains merit should one prove that a positive benefit accrues from preventing lobster gill disease, and (E) does just that. If (E) is true, the removed sewage should result in healthier lobsters who, in turn, will lead to healthier (or at least less sickly) lobster eaters.

Other sources of harm to lobsters (A) can be addressed in another proposal, but have nothing to do with the rationality of this one. That the open ocean leads to longer-lived crustacea (B) is irrelevant to the health effects of “sewage in the harbor where lobsters are caught.” By arguing that breeding success is irrelevant to pollution, (C) if anything lends credence to the claim that the sewage removal is pointless. And the detection of gill diseases (D) would be irrelevant to the claim about harmfulness even if one’s everyday knowledge didn’t tell us that people don’t tend to eat the shells but rather the lobster meat inside them.

Quote:
QUESTION TYPE: Weaken

CONCLUSION: The proposal to stop putting sewage into the harbor is pointless.

REASONING: Lobsters (eaten by humans) get gill disease when sewage is dumped in their water. But most lobsters don’t live long enough to be harmed by the disease.

ANALYSIS: This is one of the worst arguments I’ve seen on the LSAT, but it’s also very clever. So clever that many people don’t even see what’s wrong with it. The lobsters aren’t harmed, so what’s the issue, they ask?

Would you like to eat lobster contaminated by sewage and that have gill disease?

Just because the lobsters aren’t harmed doesn’t meant that there is no point to preventing gill disease. We eat them!
Further, the conclusion is really, really broad: the proposal is pointless. But the only evidence is about lobsters. There might be some benefit to cleaning the harbor, apart from healthier lobster. Maybe some fish will get less sick, maybe we can swim in the harbor, maybe the town will smell better, etc. There could be many other benefits that show the proposal is NOTpointless.”
___________
A. The proposal was only talking about redirecting sewage. Other contaminants are irrelevant since no one was proposing to clean them up.
B. That’s nice. But we don’t know why lobsters live longer in oceans and we have no evidence that it is due to lack of sewage.
C. This would strengthen the argument. Sewage doesn’t seem to harm lobster breeding.
D. This doesn’t really affect anything since the lobsters don’t get sick from the gill disease.
E. CORRECT. This gives us a good reason to prevent gill disease: we get sick if we eat polluted lobster. So the proposal has a point: it could make us healthier.

_________________

"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2018
Posts: 223
Location: United States (ID)
GPA: 3.33
WE: Accounting (Accounting)
Lobsters and other crustaceans eaten by humans--Source: Powerscore CR  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Feb 2018, 14:06
Dear experts, why C is not also a weakener? It is because C shows that the proposal is beneficial. If lobsters breed in sewage water, then the young lobsters will have the Gill disease. I guess young lobsters have nothing to do with the premise of longevity and Gill disease, isn't it?

E weakens both the conclusion and the main premise. Nevertheless, E is not convincing b/c E assumes that humans are willing to eat dead lobsters which contain the gill disease.
The pattern in E appears in another question, but that question asks about the flavor.
SC Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1676
Re: Lobsters and other crustaceans eaten by humans--Source: Powerscore CR  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Aug 2018, 22:38
Answer choice (C): The issue is not breeding frequency but longevity. So, while we are pleased to hear that lobsters in sewage-contaminated waters breed frequently, this fact does not impact an argument based on the age and disease contraction.
_________________

Thanks!
Do give some kudos.

Simple strategy:
“Once you’ve eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 1| GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 2 | How to Improve GMAT Quant from Q49 to a Perfect Q51

My Notes:
Reading comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Absolute Phrases | Subjunctive Mood

Intern
Joined: 12 Dec 2011
Posts: 46
Re: Lobsters and other crustaceans eaten by humans--Source: Powerscore CR  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Oct 2018, 19:09
I don't think E is good. So I don't think any answer will be good.

The argument actually implies that the author knows about the consequence of human eating the illed lobster. The last sentence correctly states that this diseases highly likely won't harm the lobster. Simply saying it's harmful for human to eat lobster with that disease is actually "pointless".
Re: Lobsters and other crustaceans eaten by humans--Source: Powerscore CR   [#permalink] 20 Oct 2018, 19:09
Display posts from previous: Sort by