GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 20 Jun 2018, 09:58

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Local reporters investigating the labor dispute reported

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 25 Jul 2012
Posts: 35
Concentration: Organizational Behavior, General Management
GMAT 1: 610 Q47 V26
GMAT 2: 640 Q49 V27
GPA: 4
Local reporters investigating the labor dispute reported [#permalink]

Show Tags

Updated on: 23 Jun 2013, 23:20
1
6
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

59% (01:02) correct 41% (01:06) wrong based on 384 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Local reporters investigating the labor dispute reported that only half of the workers in the plant were covered by the union health plan; at least as much as a hundred and more others had not any health insurance whatsoever.

(A)at least as much as a hundred and more others had not any
(B) at least as much as more than a hundred others had no
(C)more than a hundred others had no
(D)much more than a hundred others had no
(E)more than a hundred others did not have

_________________

PLAN >>> EXECUTE >>> MEASURE

Originally posted by akhu on 23 Jun 2013, 20:46.
Last edited by Zarrolou on 23 Jun 2013, 23:20, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the question, renamed the topic.
Manager
Status: Looking to improve
Joined: 15 Jan 2013
Posts: 166
GMAT 1: 530 Q43 V20
GMAT 2: 560 Q42 V25
GMAT 3: 650 Q48 V31

Show Tags

23 Jun 2013, 21:15
1
1
A, B and D are out because of much.

Between C and E, I would go with E. I don't see any reason for past perfect since the sentence does not require any sequencing of events. The report is showing who all are covered under insurance and who all are not. The former reference uses simple past and the later can also use simple past.

_________________

KUDOS is a way to say Thank You

Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1079
Location: United States

Show Tags

23 Jun 2013, 22:29
6
1
nt2010 wrote:
A, B and D are out because of much.

Between C and E, I would go with E. I don't see any reason for past perfect since the sentence does not require any sequencing of events. The report is showing who all are covered under insurance and who all are not. The former reference uses simple past and the later can also use simple past.

Hi nt2010

"had no" in C is NOT past perfect tense. This is simple past tense.
Simple past tense form of "have no" is "had no".

In American English (not British English), you can say:
I DO NOT HAVE any money.
--OR--
I HAVE NO money.

Both of them are correct. You can refer to GmatClub grammar book - page 85 - Negation Part I.

As you did, I eliminated A, B, D because the usage of "much" is not correct. Between C and E, I would say there are not grammar problems with both C and E, but I picked C because it's more concise than E.

Hence, C is correct.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Intern
Joined: 25 Jul 2012
Posts: 35
Concentration: Organizational Behavior, General Management
GMAT 1: 610 Q47 V26
GMAT 2: 640 Q49 V27
GPA: 4
Re: Local reporters investigating the labor dispute reported tha [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Jun 2013, 23:32
Hi pqhai ,

Thanks for quick reply, but my basic question is : had no / didn't have .

Are we rejecting E only because it is not concise ?
_________________

PLAN >>> EXECUTE >>> MEASURE

Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1079
Location: United States
Re: Local reporters investigating the labor dispute reported tha [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Jun 2013, 23:46
prinkashar wrote:
Hi pqhai ,

Thanks for quick reply, but my basic question is : had no / didn't have .

Are we rejecting E only because it is not concise ?

Hi prinkashar

If your question is "which one is correct between "had no" and "didn't have", I would say both are correct.

According to Manhattan GMAT, if you have run out of grammar or meaning issues to apply, and you are down to two choices, then choose the more concise option. Otherwise, do not think about concision.

C & E have no grammar or meaning issues, so C is better (I do not mean E is wrong). However, I think the possibility that this kind of question (just about concision) appears in GMAT is quite rare.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Manager
Joined: 09 Apr 2013
Posts: 197
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 710 Q44 V44
GMAT 2: 740 Q48 V44
GPA: 3.1
WE: Sales (Mutual Funds and Brokerage)
Re: Local reporters investigating the labor dispute reported tha [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Jun 2013, 21:40
It's very clearly C.

eliminate all the answers with "much" in them.

Then, Make the verb tense in the answer parallel to "were covered" which is past tense. "had no" is also past tense, but "did not have" isn't.
Intern
Joined: 30 Jun 2014
Posts: 11
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: ISB '16 (A)
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.9
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Local reporters investigating the labor dispute reported [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Sep 2014, 07:27
1
C for me.

I eliminated E for an entirely different reason.
If you put E into the sentence, then it becomes:-
more than a hundred others did not have health insurance whatsoever
The presence of "whatsoever" in the above sentence means that we must use either "any" so that the sentence becomes:-

more than a hundred others did not have any health insurance whatsoever
or else use the construct present in (C)
Manager
Status: Oh GMAT ! I give you one more shot :)
Joined: 14 Feb 2013
Posts: 90
Location: United States (MI)
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 580 Q44 V28
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Local reporters investigating the labor dispute reported [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Sep 2014, 10:22
1
A, B & D can be eliminated because of the use of "much more" which is wrong while referring to countable nouns.

Between C & E the difference is in the use of Simple Past tense "had" in C and Simple Present tense "have" in E.
According to GMAT the Tense used in a sentence must be consistent, unless of course the events take place at different instances.

In the non-underlined portion
Local reporters investigating the labor dispute reported that only half of the workers in the plant were covered by the union health plan; - Simple Past
There is no reason to switch to Simple Present tense in the underlined portion. The half of the workers had no insurance at the same time when the other half were covered. So a simple present is required here.
Hence C is the best option

Local reporters investigating the labor dispute reported that only half of the workers in the plant were covered by the union health plan; more than a hundred others had no health insurance whatsoever.
_________________

Life is a highway
I wanna ride it all night long

SVP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1897
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Re: Local reporters investigating the labor dispute reported [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Jan 2018, 23:44
"had no...whatsoever" will appear in the actual exam?
Pls help, thanks.
Verbal Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3200
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: Local reporters investigating the labor dispute reported [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Jan 2018, 08:36
2
chesstitans wrote:
"had no...whatsoever" will appear in the actual exam?
Pls help, thanks.

The usage is valid. "Whatsoever" here is used as an adverb to mean "at all".... "more than a hundred others had no health insurance whatsoever (= at all)."
Re: Local reporters investigating the labor dispute reported   [#permalink] 09 Jan 2018, 08:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by