Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 25 May 2017, 23:22

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Local reporters investigating the labor dispute reported

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 25 Jul 2012
Posts: 39
Concentration: Organizational Behavior, General Management
GMAT 1: 610 Q47 V26
GMAT 2: 640 Q49 V27
GPA: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 15

Local reporters investigating the labor dispute reported [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2013, 20:46
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

55% (02:05) correct 45% (01:15) wrong based on 252 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Local reporters investigating the labor dispute reported that only half of the workers in the plant were covered by the union health plan; at least as much as a hundred and more others had not any health insurance whatsoever.

(A)at least as much as a hundred and more others had not any
(B) at least as much as more than a hundred others had no
(C)more than a hundred others had no
(D)much more than a hundred others had no
(E)more than a hundred others did not have
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

PLAN >>> EXECUTE >>> MEASURE

Last edited by Zarrolou on 23 Jun 2013, 23:20, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the question, renamed the topic.
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Status: Looking to improve
Joined: 15 Jan 2013
Posts: 175
GMAT 1: 530 Q43 V20
GMAT 2: 560 Q42 V25
GMAT 3: 650 Q48 V31
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 65

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2013, 21:15
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
A, B and D are out because of much.

Between C and E, I would go with E. I don't see any reason for past perfect since the sentence does not require any sequencing of events. The report is showing who all are covered under insurance and who all are not. The former reference uses simple past and the later can also use simple past.

_________________

KUDOS is a way to say Thank You

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1132
Location: United States
Followers: 278

Kudos [?]: 3112 [3] , given: 123

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2013, 22:29
3
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
nt2010 wrote:
A, B and D are out because of much.

Between C and E, I would go with E. I don't see any reason for past perfect since the sentence does not require any sequencing of events. The report is showing who all are covered under insurance and who all are not. The former reference uses simple past and the later can also use simple past.

Hi nt2010

"had no" in C is NOT past perfect tense. This is simple past tense.
Simple past tense form of "have no" is "had no".

In American English (not British English), you can say:
I DO NOT HAVE any money.
--OR--
I HAVE NO money.

Both of them are correct. You can refer to GmatClub grammar book - page 85 - Negation Part I.

As you did, I eliminated A, B, D because the usage of "much" is not correct. Between C and E, I would say there are not grammar problems with both C and E, but I picked C because it's more concise than E.

Hence, C is correct.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Intern
Joined: 25 Jul 2012
Posts: 39
Concentration: Organizational Behavior, General Management
GMAT 1: 610 Q47 V26
GMAT 2: 640 Q49 V27
GPA: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 15

Re: Local reporters investigating the labor dispute reported tha [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2013, 23:32
Hi pqhai ,

Thanks for quick reply, but my basic question is : had no / didn't have .

Are we rejecting E only because it is not concise ?
_________________

PLAN >>> EXECUTE >>> MEASURE

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1132
Location: United States
Followers: 278

Kudos [?]: 3112 [0], given: 123

Re: Local reporters investigating the labor dispute reported tha [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2013, 23:46
prinkashar wrote:
Hi pqhai ,

Thanks for quick reply, but my basic question is : had no / didn't have .

Are we rejecting E only because it is not concise ?

Hi prinkashar

If your question is "which one is correct between "had no" and "didn't have", I would say both are correct.

According to Manhattan GMAT, if you have run out of grammar or meaning issues to apply, and you are down to two choices, then choose the more concise option. Otherwise, do not think about concision.

C & E have no grammar or meaning issues, so C is better (I do not mean E is wrong). However, I think the possibility that this kind of question (just about concision) appears in GMAT is quite rare.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Manager
Joined: 09 Apr 2013
Posts: 211
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 710 Q44 V44
GMAT 2: 740 Q48 V44
GPA: 3.1
WE: Sales (Mutual Funds and Brokerage)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 40

Re: Local reporters investigating the labor dispute reported tha [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jun 2013, 21:40
It's very clearly C.

eliminate all the answers with "much" in them.

Then, Make the verb tense in the answer parallel to "were covered" which is past tense. "had no" is also past tense, but "did not have" isn't.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10364
Followers: 999

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 0

Re: Local reporters investigating the labor dispute reported [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2014, 07:16
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Joined: 30 Jun 2014
Posts: 12
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: ISB '16 (A)
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.9
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 13 [1] , given: 15

Re: Local reporters investigating the labor dispute reported [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Sep 2014, 07:27
1
KUDOS
C for me.

I eliminated E for an entirely different reason.
If you put E into the sentence, then it becomes:-
more than a hundred others did not have health insurance whatsoever
The presence of "whatsoever" in the above sentence means that we must use either "any" so that the sentence becomes:-

more than a hundred others did not have any health insurance whatsoever
or else use the construct present in (C)
Manager
Status: Oh GMAT ! I give you one more shot :)
Joined: 14 Feb 2013
Posts: 94
Location: United States (MI)
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 580 Q44 V28
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 18

Re: Local reporters investigating the labor dispute reported [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Sep 2014, 10:22
A, B & D can be eliminated because of the use of "much more" which is wrong while referring to countable nouns.

Between C & E the difference is in the use of Simple Past tense "had" in C and Simple Present tense "have" in E.
According to GMAT the Tense used in a sentence must be consistent, unless of course the events take place at different instances.

In the non-underlined portion
Local reporters investigating the labor dispute reported that only half of the workers in the plant were covered by the union health plan; - Simple Past
There is no reason to switch to Simple Present tense in the underlined portion. The half of the workers had no insurance at the same time when the other half were covered. So a simple present is required here.
Hence C is the best option

Local reporters investigating the labor dispute reported that only half of the workers in the plant were covered by the union health plan; more than a hundred others had no health insurance whatsoever.
_________________

Life is a highway
I wanna ride it all night long

Manager
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 135
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 25

Re: Local reporters investigating the labor dispute reported [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 May 2017, 19:12
Choice C makes more sense than option E, then C should be the correct answer
Re: Local reporters investigating the labor dispute reported   [#permalink] 19 May 2017, 19:12
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
18 An investigative reporter for the New York Times found that 10 16 Apr 2016, 18:42
A report by the American Academy for the Advancement of 4 10 Feb 2016, 17:39
28 Corporations will soon be required to report to the 17 24 May 2017, 00:56
89 A report by the American Academy for the Advancement of 63 09 Mar 2017, 14:45
1 Corporations will soon be required to report to the 5 01 Aug 2015, 12:01
Display posts from previous: Sort by