It is currently 22 Jun 2017, 09:53

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 5
Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Apr 2006, 20:24
1
KUDOS
7
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

59% (02:24) correct 41% (01:39) wrong based on 467 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens. Both cattle and chickens raised for meat are often fed the type of feed that transmits the virus that causes the disease. Animals infected with the virus take more than a year to develop symptoms of Lofgren's disease, however, and chickens commercially raised for meat, unlike cattle, are generally brought to market during their first year of life.

Which of the following is most strongly supported by the information provided?

A: The virus that causes Lofgren's disease cannot be transmitted to human beings by chickens.
B: There is no way to determine whether a chicken is infected with the Lofgren's disease virus before the chicken shows symptoms of the disease.
C: A failure to observe Lofgren's disease in commercial chicken populations is not good evidence that chickens are immune to the virus that causes this disease.
D: An animal that has been infected with the virus that causes Lofgren's disease but that has not developed symptoms cannot transmit the disease to an uninfected animal of the same species.
E: The feed that chickens and cattle are fed is probably not the only source of the virus that causes Lofgren's disease.

Any opinons? I will let you all know my answer after the discussion.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by WaterFlowsUp on 06 Jun 2015, 02:50, edited 2 times in total.
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Aug 2005
Posts: 283
Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Apr 2006, 20:57
C ?
Intern
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 2
Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Apr 2006, 21:00
1
KUDOS
Its undoubtedly C
Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 114
Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Apr 2006, 21:54
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
gottodoit wrote:
Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens. Both cattle and chickens raised for meat are often fed the type of feed that transmits the virus that causes the disease. Animals infected with the virus take more than a year to develop symptoms of Lofgren's disease, however, and chickens commercially raised for meat, unlike cattle, are generally brought to market during their first year of life.
Which of the following is most strongly supported by the information provided?
A: The virus that causes Lofgren's disease cannot be transmitted to human beings by chickens.
B: There is no way to determine whether a chicken is infected with the Lofgren's disease virus before the chicken shows symptoms of the disease.
C: A failure to observe Lofgren's disease in commercial chicken populations is not good evidence that chickens are immune to the virus that causes this disease.
D: An animal that has been infected with the virus that causes Lofgren's disease but that has not developed symptoms cannot transmit the disease to an uninfected animal of the same species.
E: The feed that chickens and cattle are fed is probably not the only source of the virus that causes Lofgren's disease.

Any opinons? I will let you all know my answer after the discussion.

A: way off the topic
B: a generic statement
D: assumed ( not stated in passage)
E: assumed again
C: Supported

Ans: C
Director
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 718
Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Apr 2006, 22:16
Agree with C
_________________

IE IMBA 2010

VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1127
Location: Bangalore
Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Apr 2006, 00:37
one more for C.
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 328
Location: London
Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Apr 2006, 01:08
C it is
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2004
Posts: 495
Location: Europe
Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Apr 2006, 10:41
Not sure but 'C'.
Intern
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 5
Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Apr 2006, 15:59
Great! All C.

Anyway there is no OA.

I think it's B.

My reasoning:

B: There is no way to determine whether a chicken is infected with the Lofgren's disease virus before the chicken shows symptoms of the disease.
=> Why the disease is rarely observed in chicken because chickens are killed before (1 year) they (majority) show any symptoms. If we had some way to determine that the chickens are infected without knowing the symptoms, then the chances are that the cattle and chickens are equally infected by this disease.

C: A failure to observe Lofgren's disease in commercial chicken populations is not good evidence that chickens are immune (safe) to the virus that causes this disease.

=> why C may not be correct (I think) because, nowhere in the passage mentioned that the chickens are IMMUNE TO the virus. It's clearly mentioned that the disease is rarely observed, that means they are not really immune to this disease.

Please correct me if I am wrong somewhere.
VP
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Posts: 1403
Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Apr 2006, 16:33
I bet of C!!

Whats the OA?
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Sep 2004
Posts: 257
Location: New York City, USA
Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Apr 2006, 18:26
I go for C too.
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Jan 2006
Posts: 252
Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Apr 2006, 18:37
I go for B
Intern
Joined: 22 Dec 2005
Posts: 4
Location: France
Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Apr 2006, 21:33
C for me.

Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens. Both cattle and chickens raised for meat are often fed the type of feed that transmits the virus that causes the disease. Animals infected with the virus take more than a year to develop symptoms of Lofgren's disease, however, and chickens commercially raised for meat, unlike cattle, are generally brought to market during their first year of life.
Which of the following is most strongly supported by the information provided?

C: A failure to observe Lofgren's disease in commercial chicken populations is not good evidence that chickens are immune to the virus that causes this disease.
VP
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 1369
Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Apr 2006, 04:40
gottodoit wrote:
Great! All C.

Anyway there is no OA.

I think it's B.

My reasoning:

B: There is no way to determine whether a chicken is infected with the Lofgren's disease virus before the chicken shows symptoms of the disease.
=> Why the disease is rarely observed in chicken because chickens are killed before (1 year) they (majority) show any symptoms. If we had some way to determine that the chickens are infected without knowing the symptoms, then the chances are that the cattle and chickens are equally infected by this disease.

C: A failure to observe Lofgren's disease in commercial chicken populations is not good evidence that chickens are immune (safe) to the virus that causes this disease.

=> why C may not be correct (I think) because, nowhere in the passage mentioned that the chickens are IMMUNE TO the virus. It's clearly mentioned that the disease is rarely observed, that means they are not really immune to this disease.

Please correct me if I am wrong somewhere.

B is a sweeping generalization. C stnads out IMO
Intern
Joined: 10 Apr 2006
Posts: 6
Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Apr 2006, 10:31
I agree with gottodoit for the answer - B.

C: A failure to observe Lofgren's disease in commercial chicken populations is not good evidence that chickens are immune to the virus that causes this disease.
Explanation: In the passage, the author didn't mention anything that leads to the conclusion that chickens are immune to the virus. However, the author did mention that the disease is rare in chicken. So, this choice looks to me out of scope.

B: There is no way to determine whether a chicken is infected with the Lofgren's disease virus before the chicken shows symptoms of the disease.
Explanation: Since the chickens are generally brought to the market during their first year of life and it takes one year to develop symptoms of Lofgren's disease in any animal (that includes chicken too), so there is no way to determine whether those chickens are infected with the disease, at least with the information that is available to us to analyze.

Argument:
"Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens. Both cattle and chickens raised for meat are often fed the type of feed that transmits the virus that causes the disease. Animals infected with the virus take more than a year to develop symptoms of Lofgren's disease, however, and chickens commercially raised for meat, unlike cattle, are generally brought to market during their first year of life. "
SVP
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1689
Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Apr 2006, 10:37
Good discussion folks.

My bet on "B"
Intern
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 13
Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Apr 2006, 12:49

C is out of scope, according to me.
VP
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 1369
Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Apr 2006, 15:48
vw01 wrote:
I agree with gottodoit for the answer - B.

C: A failure to observe Lofgren's disease in commercial chicken populations is not good evidence that chickens are immune to the virus that causes this disease.
Explanation: In the passage, the author didn't mention anything that leads to the conclusion that chickens are immune to the virus. However, the author did mention that the disease is rare in chicken. So, this choice looks to me out of scope.

B: There is no way to determine whether a chicken is infected with the Lofgren's disease virus before the chicken shows symptoms of the disease.
Explanation: Since the chickens are generally brought to the market during their first year of life and it takes one year to develop symptoms of Lofgren's disease in any animal (that includes chicken too), so there is no way to determine whether those chickens are infected with the disease, at least with the information that is available to us to analyze.

Argument:
"Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens. Both cattle and chickens raised for meat are often fed the type of feed that transmits the virus that causes the disease. Animals infected with the virus take more than a year to develop symptoms of Lofgren's disease, however, and chickens commercially raised for meat, unlike cattle, are generally brought to market during their first year of life. "

I chose C because in B the bolded portion is contradictory

B says there is no way but the stem says "very rarely" . So B is a sweeping generalization

Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens
Intern
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 5
Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Apr 2006, 16:04
trivikram wrote:
vw01 wrote:
I agree with gottodoit for the answer - B.

C: A failure to observe Lofgren's disease in commercial chicken populations is not good evidence that chickens are immune to the virus that causes this disease.
Explanation: In the passage, the author didn't mention anything that leads to the conclusion that chickens are immune to the virus. However, the author did mention that the disease is rare in chicken. So, this choice looks to me out of scope.

B: There is no way to determine whether a chicken is infected with the Lofgren's disease virus before the chicken shows symptoms of the disease.
Explanation: Since the chickens are generally brought to the market during their first year of life and it takes one year to develop symptoms of Lofgren's disease in any animal (that includes chicken too), so there is no way to determine whether those chickens are infected with the disease, at least with the information that is available to us to analyze.

Argument:
"Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens. Both cattle and chickens raised for meat are often fed the type of feed that transmits the virus that causes the disease. Animals infected with the virus take more than a year to develop symptoms of Lofgren's disease, however, and chickens commercially raised for meat, unlike cattle, are generally brought to market during their first year of life. "

I chose C because in B the bolded portion is contradictory

B says there is no way but the stem says "very rarely" . So B is a sweeping generalization

Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens

Stem says disease observed very rarely because "chichens are generally brought to market during their first year of life" so it's very rare that they are kept beyond the first year of their life. There is nothing wrong in B.

Had they been kept alive for more than one year (like Cows), chickens would have shown the symptom "very frequently".

VP
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 1369
Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Apr 2006, 16:12
gottodoit wrote:
trivikram wrote:
vw01 wrote:
I agree with gottodoit for the answer - B.

C: A failure to observe Lofgren's disease in commercial chicken populations is not good evidence that chickens are immune to the virus that causes this disease.
Explanation: In the passage, the author didn't mention anything that leads to the conclusion that chickens are immune to the virus. However, the author did mention that the disease is rare in chicken. So, this choice looks to me out of scope.

B: There is no way to determine whether a chicken is infected with the Lofgren's disease virus before the chicken shows symptoms of the disease.
Explanation: Since the chickens are generally brought to the market during their first year of life and it takes one year to develop symptoms of Lofgren's disease in any animal (that includes chicken too), so there is no way to determine whether those chickens are infected with the disease, at least with the information that is available to us to analyze.

Argument:
"Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens. Both cattle and chickens raised for meat are often fed the type of feed that transmits the virus that causes the disease. Animals infected with the virus take more than a year to develop symptoms of Lofgren's disease, however, and chickens commercially raised for meat, unlike cattle, are generally brought to market during their first year of life. "

I chose C because in B the bolded portion is contradictory

B says there is no way but the stem says "very rarely" . So B is a sweeping generalization

Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens

Stem says disease observed very rarely because "chichens are generally brought to market during their first year of life" so it's very rare that they are kept beyond the first year of their life. There is nothing wrong in B.

Had they been kept alive for more than one year (like Cows), chickens would have shown the symptom "very frequently".

Good point gottodoit.

But consider this

however, and chickens commercially raised for meat, unlike cattle, are generally brought to market during their first year of life

There is no gurantee that all the chicken are brought before the first year

Where as B states

"There is no way to determine whether a chicken is infected with the Lofgren's disease virus before the chicken shows symptoms of the disease. "
which is not right 'cos it is too generic.

Truly appreciate you for a very good question though
Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in   [#permalink] 13 Apr 2006, 16:12

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 35 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 The Observer is a newspaper company that has two divisions 4 17 Jun 2017, 21:28
7 While is true that effects of disease have been overlooked 8 10 Dec 2016, 22:47
4 Country X has the world's highest rate of skin cancer, a disease 4 20 May 2017, 15:09
Seattle's osprey population has been 5 24 Dec 2016, 07:20
4 When a married couple has frequent emotionally satisfying 1 15 Sep 2015, 08:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by