It is currently 16 Dec 2017, 06:49

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 5

Kudos [?]: 9 [1], given: 0

Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Apr 2006, 19:24
1
This post received
KUDOS
8
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

60% (01:20) correct 40% (01:36) wrong based on 549 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens. Both cattle and chickens raised for meat are often fed the type of feed that transmits the virus that causes the disease. Animals infected with the virus take more than a year to develop symptoms of Lofgren's disease, however, and chickens commercially raised for meat, unlike cattle, are generally brought to market during their first year of life.

Which of the following is most strongly supported by the information provided?

A: The virus that causes Lofgren's disease cannot be transmitted to human beings by chickens.
B: There is no way to determine whether a chicken is infected with the Lofgren's disease virus before the chicken shows symptoms of the disease.
C: A failure to observe Lofgren's disease in commercial chicken populations is not good evidence that chickens are immune to the virus that causes this disease.
D: An animal that has been infected with the virus that causes Lofgren's disease but that has not developed symptoms cannot transmit the disease to an uninfected animal of the same species.
E: The feed that chickens and cattle are fed is probably not the only source of the virus that causes Lofgren's disease.

Any opinons? I will let you all know my answer after the discussion.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by WaterFlowsUp on 06 Jun 2015, 01:50, edited 2 times in total.
OA Added

Kudos [?]: 9 [1], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Aug 2005
Posts: 281

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Apr 2006, 19:57
C ?

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: 1 [1], given: 0

Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Apr 2006, 20:00
1
This post received
KUDOS
Its undoubtedly C

Kudos [?]: 1 [1], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 114

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Apr 2006, 20:54
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
gottodoit wrote:
Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens. Both cattle and chickens raised for meat are often fed the type of feed that transmits the virus that causes the disease. Animals infected with the virus take more than a year to develop symptoms of Lofgren's disease, however, and chickens commercially raised for meat, unlike cattle, are generally brought to market during their first year of life.
Which of the following is most strongly supported by the information provided?
A: The virus that causes Lofgren's disease cannot be transmitted to human beings by chickens.
B: There is no way to determine whether a chicken is infected with the Lofgren's disease virus before the chicken shows symptoms of the disease.
C: A failure to observe Lofgren's disease in commercial chicken populations is not good evidence that chickens are immune to the virus that causes this disease.
D: An animal that has been infected with the virus that causes Lofgren's disease but that has not developed symptoms cannot transmit the disease to an uninfected animal of the same species.
E: The feed that chickens and cattle are fed is probably not the only source of the virus that causes Lofgren's disease.

Any opinons? I will let you all know my answer after the discussion.


A: way off the topic
B: a generic statement
D: assumed ( not stated in passage)
E: assumed again
C: Supported

Ans: C

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 09 Oct 2005
Posts: 712

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

Location: Madrid
Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Apr 2006, 21:16
Agree with C
_________________

IE IMBA 2010

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1124

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangalore
Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Apr 2006, 23:37
one more for C.

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 324

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Location: London
Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Apr 2006, 00:08
C it is

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2004
Posts: 494

Kudos [?]: 95 [0], given: 0

Location: Europe
Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Apr 2006, 09:41
Not sure but 'C'.

Kudos [?]: 95 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 5

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Apr 2006, 14:59
Great! All C.

:P

Anyway there is no OA.

I think it's B.

My reasoning:

B: There is no way to determine whether a chicken is infected with the Lofgren's disease virus before the chicken shows symptoms of the disease.
=> Why the disease is rarely observed in chicken because chickens are killed before (1 year) they (majority) show any symptoms. If we had some way to determine that the chickens are infected without knowing the symptoms, then the chances are that the cattle and chickens are equally infected by this disease.

C: A failure to observe Lofgren's disease in commercial chicken populations is not good evidence that chickens are immune (safe) to the virus that causes this disease.


=> why C may not be correct (I think) because, nowhere in the passage mentioned that the chickens are IMMUNE TO the virus. It's clearly mentioned that the disease is rarely observed, that means they are not really immune to this disease.

Please correct me if I am wrong somewhere.

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Posts: 1402

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Apr 2006, 15:33
I bet of C!!

Whats the OA?

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Sep 2004
Posts: 257

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Location: New York City, USA
Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Apr 2006, 17:26
I go for C too.

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 24 Jan 2006
Posts: 251

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Apr 2006, 17:37
I go for B

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2005
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: France
Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Apr 2006, 20:33
C for me.

Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens. Both cattle and chickens raised for meat are often fed the type of feed that transmits the virus that causes the disease. Animals infected with the virus take more than a year to develop symptoms of Lofgren's disease, however, and chickens commercially raised for meat, unlike cattle, are generally brought to market during their first year of life.
Which of the following is most strongly supported by the information provided?

C: A failure to observe Lofgren's disease in commercial chicken populations is not good evidence that chickens are immune to the virus that causes this disease.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 1367

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Apr 2006, 03:40
gottodoit wrote:
Great! All C.

:P

Anyway there is no OA.

I think it's B.

My reasoning:

B: There is no way to determine whether a chicken is infected with the Lofgren's disease virus before the chicken shows symptoms of the disease.
=> Why the disease is rarely observed in chicken because chickens are killed before (1 year) they (majority) show any symptoms. If we had some way to determine that the chickens are infected without knowing the symptoms, then the chances are that the cattle and chickens are equally infected by this disease.

C: A failure to observe Lofgren's disease in commercial chicken populations is not good evidence that chickens are immune (safe) to the virus that causes this disease.


=> why C may not be correct (I think) because, nowhere in the passage mentioned that the chickens are IMMUNE TO the virus. It's clearly mentioned that the disease is rarely observed, that means they are not really immune to this disease.

Please correct me if I am wrong somewhere.


B is a sweeping generalization. C stnads out IMO

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Apr 2006
Posts: 6

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Apr 2006, 09:31
I agree with gottodoit for the answer - B.

C: A failure to observe Lofgren's disease in commercial chicken populations is not good evidence that chickens are immune to the virus that causes this disease.
Explanation: In the passage, the author didn't mention anything that leads to the conclusion that chickens are immune to the virus. However, the author did mention that the disease is rare in chicken. So, this choice looks to me out of scope.

B: There is no way to determine whether a chicken is infected with the Lofgren's disease virus before the chicken shows symptoms of the disease.
Explanation: Since the chickens are generally brought to the market during their first year of life and it takes one year to develop symptoms of Lofgren's disease in any animal (that includes chicken too), so there is no way to determine whether those chickens are infected with the disease, at least with the information that is available to us to analyze.

Argument:
"Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens. Both cattle and chickens raised for meat are often fed the type of feed that transmits the virus that causes the disease. Animals infected with the virus take more than a year to develop symptoms of Lofgren's disease, however, and chickens commercially raised for meat, unlike cattle, are generally brought to market during their first year of life. "

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1681

Kudos [?]: 172 [0], given: 0

Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Apr 2006, 09:37
Good discussion folks.

My bet on "B"

Kudos [?]: 172 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 13

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Apr 2006, 11:49
My answer is 'B'.

C is out of scope, according to me.

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 1367

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Apr 2006, 14:48
vw01 wrote:
I agree with gottodoit for the answer - B.

C: A failure to observe Lofgren's disease in commercial chicken populations is not good evidence that chickens are immune to the virus that causes this disease.
Explanation: In the passage, the author didn't mention anything that leads to the conclusion that chickens are immune to the virus. However, the author did mention that the disease is rare in chicken. So, this choice looks to me out of scope.

B: There is no way to determine whether a chicken is infected with the Lofgren's disease virus before the chicken shows symptoms of the disease.
Explanation: Since the chickens are generally brought to the market during their first year of life and it takes one year to develop symptoms of Lofgren's disease in any animal (that includes chicken too), so there is no way to determine whether those chickens are infected with the disease, at least with the information that is available to us to analyze.

Argument:
"Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens. Both cattle and chickens raised for meat are often fed the type of feed that transmits the virus that causes the disease. Animals infected with the virus take more than a year to develop symptoms of Lofgren's disease, however, and chickens commercially raised for meat, unlike cattle, are generally brought to market during their first year of life. "



I chose C because in B the bolded portion is contradictory

B says there is no way but the stem says "very rarely" . So B is a sweeping generalization

Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 5

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Apr 2006, 15:04
trivikram wrote:
vw01 wrote:
I agree with gottodoit for the answer - B.

C: A failure to observe Lofgren's disease in commercial chicken populations is not good evidence that chickens are immune to the virus that causes this disease.
Explanation: In the passage, the author didn't mention anything that leads to the conclusion that chickens are immune to the virus. However, the author did mention that the disease is rare in chicken. So, this choice looks to me out of scope.

B: There is no way to determine whether a chicken is infected with the Lofgren's disease virus before the chicken shows symptoms of the disease.
Explanation: Since the chickens are generally brought to the market during their first year of life and it takes one year to develop symptoms of Lofgren's disease in any animal (that includes chicken too), so there is no way to determine whether those chickens are infected with the disease, at least with the information that is available to us to analyze.

Argument:
"Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens. Both cattle and chickens raised for meat are often fed the type of feed that transmits the virus that causes the disease. Animals infected with the virus take more than a year to develop symptoms of Lofgren's disease, however, and chickens commercially raised for meat, unlike cattle, are generally brought to market during their first year of life. "



I chose C because in B the bolded portion is contradictory

B says there is no way but the stem says "very rarely" . So B is a sweeping generalization

Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens


Stem says disease observed very rarely because "chichens are generally brought to market during their first year of life" so it's very rare that they are kept beyond the first year of their life. There is nothing wrong in B.

Had they been kept alive for more than one year (like Cows), chickens would have shown the symptom "very frequently".

Any comments!

Still I don't see any convincing point to discard B. I think my comments about C are enough to discard it!

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 1367

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Apr 2006, 15:12
gottodoit wrote:
trivikram wrote:
vw01 wrote:
I agree with gottodoit for the answer - B.

C: A failure to observe Lofgren's disease in commercial chicken populations is not good evidence that chickens are immune to the virus that causes this disease.
Explanation: In the passage, the author didn't mention anything that leads to the conclusion that chickens are immune to the virus. However, the author did mention that the disease is rare in chicken. So, this choice looks to me out of scope.

B: There is no way to determine whether a chicken is infected with the Lofgren's disease virus before the chicken shows symptoms of the disease.
Explanation: Since the chickens are generally brought to the market during their first year of life and it takes one year to develop symptoms of Lofgren's disease in any animal (that includes chicken too), so there is no way to determine whether those chickens are infected with the disease, at least with the information that is available to us to analyze.

Argument:
"Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens. Both cattle and chickens raised for meat are often fed the type of feed that transmits the virus that causes the disease. Animals infected with the virus take more than a year to develop symptoms of Lofgren's disease, however, and chickens commercially raised for meat, unlike cattle, are generally brought to market during their first year of life. "



I chose C because in B the bolded portion is contradictory

B says there is no way but the stem says "very rarely" . So B is a sweeping generalization

Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens


Stem says disease observed very rarely because "chichens are generally brought to market during their first year of life" so it's very rare that they are kept beyond the first year of their life. There is nothing wrong in B.

Had they been kept alive for more than one year (like Cows), chickens would have shown the symptom "very frequently".

Any comments!

Still I don't see any convincing point to discard B. I think my comments about C are enough to discard it!


Good point gottodoit.

But consider this

however, and chickens commercially raised for meat, unlike cattle, are generally brought to market during their first year of life

There is no gurantee that all the chicken are brought before the first year

Where as B states

"There is no way to determine whether a chicken is infected with the Lofgren's disease virus before the chicken shows symptoms of the disease. "
which is not right 'cos it is too generic.

Truly appreciate you for a very good question though

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Re: Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in   [#permalink] 13 Apr 2006, 15:12

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 35 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Lofgren's disease has been observed frequently in

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.