It is currently 22 Nov 2017, 22:46

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# m01 - Q 20

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 15 Jun 2008
Posts: 3

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2008, 03:19
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
If Jim saved a total of $90 in 3 weeks, how much did he save in week 2? (1) Jim's average savings for the first 2 weeks were$20
(2) Jim's first week's savings were half of his savings in week 2 and a third of his savings in week 3

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
B

Source: GMAT Club Tests - hardest GMAT questions

Let's suppose , S1 , S2 and S3 are the amounts Jim saved for the first, second, and third week correspondingly.

From statement (1) we have that S1 + S2 = 120, but the question says that S1 + S2 + S3 = 180, so S3 = -40; he lost $40 during the third week. From the statement (2) we can construct system of equations: S1 + S2 + S3 = 80 2S1 - S2 = 0 3S1 - S3 = 0 How was above two equations written using the statement ?Subtracting second equation from the third gives us Solving it gives the value of . The answer is B. Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0 Manager Joined: 14 May 2008 Posts: 57 Kudos [?]: 16 [2], given: 1 Schools: Wharton (WEMBA East) Re: m01 - Q 20 explaination not clear pls put some light [#permalink] ### Show Tags 18 Oct 2008, 14:40 2 This post received KUDOS The answer and explanation are correct, I solved it via S2, same as ritula, sum of the parts, x = 13 1/3, 2x = 26 2/3. But S1 then contradicts S2. As I understand it, that's not supposed to be possible on a DS question. S1 can be insufficient, but it can't be wrong. In this case it's wrong. If S1 stated that the average for the first 2 weeks was$20, this would be reconciled (and the answer stays the same).

Kudos [?]: 16 [2], given: 1

VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1258

Kudos [?]: 541 [1], given: 0

Re: m01 - Q 20 explaination not clear pls put some light [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2008, 04:09
1
KUDOS
Frm (2) let the savings for three weeks be x, 2x, 3x
Then x+2x+3x= total savings=80
x can be found hence saving for second week can also be found
Ans: B

Kudos [?]: 541 [1], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 04 Jun 2012
Posts: 8

Kudos [?]: 1 [1], given: 1

GMAT Date: 09-16-2013
Re: m01 - Q 20 explaination not clear pls put some light [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2012, 05:26
1
KUDOS
Here's my logic to this question:

1) He could have saved $10 in week 1 and$30 in week 2 and you get an average of $20 OR he could have saved$20 in both week 1 and 2 and that gives you an average of $20. Clearly Not sufficient 2) You get only one value for this. Week 2=$30... Week 1= $15.... Week 3=$45
All 3 weeks equal $90. Try to plug in other values and it doesn't work. Answer B Kudos [?]: 1 [1], given: 1 Manager Joined: 28 Jul 2008 Posts: 99 Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0 Re: m01 - Q 20 explaination not clear pls put some light [#permalink] ### Show Tags 21 Sep 2008, 10:35 I believe the first statement is meaningles. IMO saving must be positive whereas just like he mentioned it comes out to be negative ? Should be corrected. Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0 CIO Joined: 02 Oct 2007 Posts: 1216 Kudos [?]: 987 [0], given: 334 Re: m01 - Q 20 explaination not clear pls put some light [#permalink] ### Show Tags 23 Oct 2008, 06:51 Thanks, we'll edit the question. It indeed has a typo. +1 scorcho wrote: The answer and explanation are correct, I solved it via S2, same as ritula, sum of the parts, x = 13 1/3, 2x = 26 2/3. But S1 then contradicts S2. As I understand it, that's not supposed to be possible on a DS question. S1 can be insufficient, but it can't be wrong. In this case it's wrong. If S1 stated that the average for the first 2 weeks was$20, this would be reconciled (and the answer stays the same).

_________________

Welcome to GMAT Club!

Want to solve GMAT questions on the go? GMAT Club iPhone app will help.
Result correlation between real GMAT and GMAT Club Tests
Are GMAT Club Test sets ordered in any way?

Take 15 free tests with questions from GMAT Club, Knewton, Manhattan GMAT, and Veritas.

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 987 [0], given: 334

Director
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 727

Kudos [?]: 868 [0], given: 99

Re: m01 - Q 20 explaination not clear pls put some light [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Oct 2008, 07:25
OK. may be I misinterpreted statement 2.

I concluded

S1 = 1/2 S2 + 1/3 S3 so I chose answer 5.

2S1 - S2 =0
3S1 - S3 = 0

In Statement 2, it used 'And' not 'Or' right? can you guys explain me understanding this?

Thanks.

Kudos [?]: 868 [0], given: 99

SVP
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2471

Kudos [?]: 857 [0], given: 19

Re: m01 - Q 20 explaination not clear pls put some light [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Oct 2008, 09:36
dzyubam wrote:
Thanks, we'll edit the question. It indeed has a typo.
+1

scorcho wrote:
The answer and explanation are correct, I solved it via S2, same as ritula, sum of the parts, x = 13 1/3, 2x = 26 2/3.

But S1 then contradicts S2. As I understand it, that's not supposed to be possible on a DS question. S1 can be insufficient, but it can't be wrong. In this case it's wrong.

If S1 stated that the average for the first 2 weeks was $20, this would be reconciled (and the answer stays the same). Yeah, thats necessary to make the question worthful. Thanks. _________________ Verbal: http://gmatclub.com/forum/new-to-the-verbal-forum-please-read-this-first-77546.html Math: http://gmatclub.com/forum/new-to-the-math-forum-please-read-this-first-77764.html Gmat: http://gmatclub.com/forum/everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html GT Kudos [?]: 857 [0], given: 19 Director Joined: 01 Aug 2008 Posts: 727 Kudos [?]: 868 [0], given: 99 Re: m01 - Q 20 explaination not clear pls put some light [#permalink] ### Show Tags 31 Oct 2008, 10:45 GMATTIGER, can you explain a bit more? are you saying that is correct(usning 'and' in statement 2 instead of an 'or') or wrong? any help would be appreciated. Thanks. Kudos [?]: 868 [0], given: 99 SVP Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 2471 Kudos [?]: 857 [0], given: 19 Re: m01 - Q 20 explaination not clear pls put some light [#permalink] ### Show Tags 01 Nov 2008, 12:14 ugimba wrote: GMATTIGER, can you explain a bit more? are you saying that is correct(usning 'and' in statement 2 instead of an 'or') or wrong? any help would be appreciated. Thanks. According to the question: From statement 1: (w1 + w2)/2 = 60 w1 + w2 = 120 Since the question says that saving in 3 weeks is 80, how is it possible to 120 savings in 2 weeks. Ok, The question might assume that there is a negative savings of$40 in w3. Ok agreed.

From statement 2: w1 = w2/2 = w3/3
so w2 = 2w1 and w3 = 3w1
w1 + w2 + w3 = 80

Since w1+w2+w3 = 80, and w1+w2 = 120, it cannot be true that w3 = 3w1 because w3 saving is -ve and w1 is +ve.. Therefore the assumptions are self contradictory. However, I am sure "dzyubam" might have already changed the question as required.

Quote:
Jim has saved $80 in 3 weeks. How much did he save in Week 2? 1. Average savings for the first 2 weeks are$60
2. First week savings are half of what he saved in week 2 and a third of what he saved in week 3

_________________

Gmat: http://gmatclub.com/forum/everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html

GT

Kudos [?]: 857 [0], given: 19

Intern
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 46

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 1

Schools: Marshall '11

### Show Tags

05 Feb 2009, 22:56
the next # after 324,700 to have tens digit 2 and units digit 1 is 324721, the one after that is: 324821, 324921, etc. So we see here that # w/tens digit 2 and units digit 1 comes every 100 #s.
So to get the answer, we find out how many 100 #s are there btw 458,600 and 324,700:
(458,600-324,700)/100=1338, 1338+1=1339 to be inclusive.
So the answer is A: 1339

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 1

SVP
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1790

Kudos [?]: 1089 [0], given: 5

Location: New York

### Show Tags

06 Feb 2009, 12:08
wcgmatclub wrote:
the next # after 324,700 to have tens digit 2 and units digit 1 is 324721, the one after that is: 324821, 324921, etc. So we see here that # w/tens digit 2 and units digit 1 comes every 100 #s.
So to get the answer, we find out how many 100 #s are there btw 458,600 and 324,700:
(458,600-324,700)/100=1338, 1338+1=1339 to be inclusive.
So the answer is A: 1339

small correction..

_________________

Smiling wins more friends than frowning

Kudos [?]: 1089 [0], given: 5

Intern
Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Posts: 12

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 3

Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V25
Re: m01 - Q 20 explaination not clear pls put some light [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2011, 07:56
itiskavikatha wrote:
If Jim saved a total of $90 in 3 weeks, how much did he save in week 2? 1. Jim's average savings for the first 2 weeks were$20
2. Jim's first week's savings were half of his savings in week 2 and a third of his savings in week 3

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
B

Source: GMAT Club Tests - hardest GMAT questions

1) offcourse is not sufficient to solve
2) S1+S2+S3 = 90
S1 = 1/2S2
S3 = 3S1 = 3/2(S2)

S2(1+1/2+3/2) = 90
S2 = 180/6 = 30 hence B

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 3

Intern
Status: UF BSBA '15 - Preparing for the future
Joined: 09 May 2011
Posts: 25

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 2

Location: United States
GPA: 3.87
WE: Human Resources (Consulting)
Re: m01 - Q 20 explaination not clear pls put some light [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2011, 12:02
Here is something I do not understand.

According to statement one, the average savings for the first two weeks were $20. I assumed that meant after two weeks he had$40.

Where are people getting $120 from? Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 2 Intern Joined: 19 Jul 2012 Posts: 2 Kudos [?]: [0], given: 8 GPA: 3.65 Re: m01 - Q 20 [#permalink] ### Show Tags 19 Jul 2012, 15:38 1) First statement only give the average of the first two weeks. May be there was no income in the first or second week. Incomplete information. 2) you can create a equation to solve with this information 1/2x + x + 3(1/2x) = 90 (You don't have to solve, just create an equation to establish relationship) Ans : B ( 2nd statement is sufficient to ans., but not 1st) Kudos [?]: [0], given: 8 Math Expert Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 42305 Kudos [?]: 133079 [0], given: 12403 Re: m01 - Q 20 [#permalink] ### Show Tags 20 Jul 2012, 05:18 itiskavikatha wrote: If Jim saved a total of$90 in 3 weeks, how much did he save in week 2?

(1) Jim's average savings for the first 2 weeks were $20 (2) Jim's first week's savings were half of his savings in week 2 and a third of his savings in week 3 Note that: on the GMAT, two data sufficiency statements always provide TRUE information and these statements never contradict each other. But for this question, from the first statement we get that the total savings for the first 2 weeks were$40 and from the second statement we get that the total savings for the first 2 weeks were $15+$30=$45, so the statements clearly contradict each other. Revised question reads: If Jim saved a total of$90 in 3 weeks, how much did he save in week 2?

Say $$S_1$$, $$S_2$$, and $$S_3$$ are the amounts Jim saved for the first, second, and third week, respectively.

(1) Jim's average savings for the first 2 weeks were \$22.5. Given: $$S_1+S_2=2*22.5=45$$, not sufficient to get the value of $$S_2$$.

(2) Jim's first week's savings were half of his savings in week 2 and a third of his savings in week 3. Given: $$2*S_1=S_2$$ and $$3*S_1=S_3$$. Since, also given that $$S_1+S_2+S_3=90$$, then $$S_1+2*S_1+3*S_1=90$$, which gives $$S_1=15$$. Therefore $$S_2=2*S_1=30$$. Sufficient..

Hope it's clear.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 133079 [0], given: 12403

Intern
Joined: 16 Mar 2012
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: m01 - Q 20 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2012, 00:07
B is right guys??!!!

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42305

Kudos [?]: 133079 [0], given: 12403

Re: m01 - Q 20 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2012, 00:48
mehak89 wrote:
B is right guys??!!!

Correct answer is given in the first post under the spoiler.

Revised version of this question is given in the post above yours: m01-q-75464.html#p1105999
_________________

Kudos [?]: 133079 [0], given: 12403

Re: m01 - Q 20   [#permalink] 08 Aug 2012, 00:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# m01 - Q 20

Moderator: Bunuel

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.