May 24 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Join a FREE 1day workshop and learn how to ace the GMAT while keeping your fulltime job. Limited for the first 99 registrants. May 25 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar and master GMAT SC in 10 days by learning how meaning and logic can help you tackle 700+ level SC questions with ease. May 27 01:00 AM PDT  11:59 PM PDT All GMAT Club Tests are free and open on May 27th for Memorial Day! May 27 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Special savings are here for Magoosh GMAT Prep! Even better  save 20% on the plan of your choice, now through midnight on Tuesday, 5/27 May 30 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Application deadlines are just around the corner, so now’s the time to start studying for the GMAT! Start today and save 25% on your GMAT prep. Valid until May 30th. Jun 01 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Learn reading strategies that can help even nonvoracious reader to master GMAT RC
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55271

Question Stats:
51% (02:30) correct 49% (02:37) wrong based on 211 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Andy, George and Sally are a team of consultants working on Project Alpha. They have an eight hour deadline to complete the project. The team members work at constant rates throughout the eight hour period. If the team of three has to begin work now and no one else can work on this project, will Project Alpha be completed by the deadline? (1) Sally can finish the project alone in \(4k+7\) hours, where \(k\) is a positive integer with a minimum value of 1 and a maximum value of 5. (2) Working alone, George will take \(2k+1\) hours and Andy will take \(3+2k\) hours, where \(k\) is a positive integer with a minimum value of 1 and a maximum value of 5
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55271

Re M0207
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Sep 2014, 00:17
Official Solution: Statement (1) by itself is not sufficient. From S1, we know Sally can finish the project in \(4k+7\) hours, but we know nothing about George's or Andy's time. Check if Sally can finish the work by herself. If \(k\) is the smallest value (1), Sally will need 11 hours to finish the project. We need to know George's and/or Andy's rate. Statement (2) by itself is sufficient. From S2, we know that George will take \(2k+1\) hours and Andy will take \(2k+3\) hours. Check whether George and Andy can finish the project by themselves. Check to see if the maximum value of \(k\) is sufficient for these two together to finish the project. If the maximum value of \(k = 5\), then George needs 11 hours and Andy needs 13 hours to finish the project alone. Working together for one hour, George and Andy will finish: \(\frac{1}{11} + \frac{1}{13} = \frac{11+13}{11*13} = \frac{24}{143} \gt \frac{1}{8}\) of the work. Thus, working together, George and Andy finish a greater portion of work per hour than the required \(\frac{1}{8}\). As a result, they will easily finish the project by themselves. It is not necessary to know Sally's time to answer the question. Alternative explanation: To complete the job on time, George and Andy have to complete \(\frac{1}{8}\) of the job each hour together or \(\frac{1}{16}\) each (50% of \(\frac{1}{8}\)). Because they complete \(\frac{1}{11}\) and \(\frac{1}{13}\) respectively, that's all we need to know. Another method is to perform a rough calculation: \(\frac{1}{11}+\frac{1}{13} \approx \frac{1}{12}+\frac{1}{12}=\frac{2}{12}=\frac{1}{6} \gt \frac{1}{8}\). Answer: B
_________________



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 7686

mpcroaming wrote: A really easy way to look at this is as follows:
for section (2) put 1 into the equation ( the minimum work value) for George and andy and you get G = 3 and A = 5. This add up to 8 so together they can complete it in 8 hours which is already enough to meet the deadline. therefore it doesn't even matter what Sallys rate is. Not sure if this is the correct rational but it worked for me. hi, your method is wrong on two counts.. George will take 2k+1 hours and Andy will take 3+2k hours, 1) firstly by substituting k as 1, you are taking the minimum time they will take. so G alone can finish in 3 hrs, and he doesn't require anyone to finish before 8 hrs.... SO, you look at the max time they take to be certain that even at the lowest speed they can finish the work in <8 hrs.. 2) second fault is if G can do it in 3 hrs and A can do in 5 hrs... both combined will not do it in 3+5 hrs, but less than 3 hrs.. if some one alone was doing in 3 hrs, and he gets help, he will do it in lesser time.. Hope the concepts have become slightly clearer..
_________________



Intern
Joined: 23 Aug 2014
Posts: 34
GMAT Date: 11292014

Re: M0207
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Dec 2014, 00:05
Sorry, just 1 question. Lets say S2 gave a value more than 8 hours. Then it would be insufficient, but S1+S2 would be sufficient, right?



Manager
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 227

Re: M0207
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Mar 2015, 05:46
Deeuk, Firstly consider the below cases: 1. say, k =5 (Maximum) Then also, on further simplification, 1/11 + 1/13 > 1/8 2. say, k =1 (Minimum) Then also, on further simplification, 1/3 + 1/5 > 1/8 Both cases, its sufficient to decipher that both person sufficient to do alpha within the schedule of 8 hours. Hence B is the answer to the said question. Yes, coming to your question, yes if we could find different solution to both cases, then we would have to consider the first option, then in that case, C would have been the answer. Hope its clear.
_________________
Kindly press the Kudos to appreciate my post !!



Intern
Joined: 27 Sep 2015
Posts: 18
WE: Sales (Transportation)

Re: M0207
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Feb 2016, 20:01
A really easy way to look at this is as follows:
for section (2) put 1 into the equation ( the minimum work value) for George and andy and you get G = 3 and A = 5. This add up to 8 so together they can complete it in 8 hours which is already enough to meet the deadline. therefore it doesn't even matter what Sallys rate is. Not sure if this is the correct rational but it worked for me.



Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2015
Posts: 54
Location: United States
GPA: 2.99
WE: Corporate Finance (Aerospace and Defense)

Re: M0207
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 May 2016, 06:54
chetan2u wrote: mpcroaming wrote: A really easy way to look at this is as follows:
for section (2) put 1 into the equation ( the minimum work value) for George and andy and you get G = 3 and A = 5. This add up to 8 so together they can complete it in 8 hours which is already enough to meet the deadline. therefore it doesn't even matter what Sallys rate is. Not sure if this is the correct rational but it worked for me. hi, your method is wrong on two counts.. George will take 2k+1 hours and Andy will take 3+2k hours, 1) firstly by substituting k as 1, you are taking the minimum time they will take. so G alone can finish in 3 hrs, and he doesn't require anyone to finish before 8 hrs.... SO, you look at the max time they take to be certain that even at the lowest speed they can finish the work in <8 hrs.. 2) second fault is if G can do it in 3 hrs and A can do in 5 hrs... both combined will not do it in 3+5 hrs, but less than 3 hrs.. if some one alone was doing in 3 hrs, and he gets help, he will do it in lesser time.. Hope the concepts have become slightly clearer.. Thank you very much! Your explanation really helped me out.



Current Student
Joined: 28 Aug 2016
Posts: 88
Concentration: Strategy, General Management

For 2), I did it slightly differently although it is basically a same solution as the explanation.
Set k = 5 (maximum)
time = 8 hrs
So the equation to verify would be
8/11 + 8/13 > 1
Which it clearly is. Therefore 2) is sufficient. I think this way is much easier to tell at first glance without doing any further calculation rather than comparing fractions.



Intern
Joined: 26 Jul 2016
Posts: 28
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.69
WE: Analyst (Manufacturing)

Re: M0207
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Oct 2016, 05:58
hi, why can't it be done in this way George will take 2k+1 hours and Andy will take 3+2k hours taking minimum value (1) 2(1) +1 & 3+2(1)= 3+8
wprk done in one hour = 1/3 +1/5 5/15+3/15=8/15 in one hour by this we can easily state that that work can be done in less than 8 hours.



Manager
Joined: 11 Aug 2016
Posts: 70
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT Date: 02042017
GPA: 3.6
WE: General Management (Other)

Re: M0207
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Aug 2017, 03:02
Very nice question. All that has been asked is can the worked be finished on time. And if even one can do it, then we won't require rest.
_________________
If you have any queries, you can always whatsapp on my number +91945412028 Ayush



Intern
Joined: 09 Jun 2018
Posts: 23
GMAT 1: 610 Q42 V33 GMAT 2: 620 Q40 V35
GPA: 3.32

Re: M0207
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Apr 2019, 09:16
Thank you Bunuel for explaining two alternative methods for solving this problem



Intern
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Posts: 6

Re: M0207
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Apr 2019, 01:31
I misunderstood the part 'If the team of three has to begin work now and no one else can work on this project' in that i thought all three are required to work upon the project. Statement(1) is not sufficient. Statement(2), i just marked as not sufficient again since Sally's rate are not mentioned. Because of my misunderstanding (with a gut feeling that i am missing something here which kept bugging me during finding the solution) I didn't even thought of solving Statement(2) believing that i might lose time here. Later, i combined both statements and marked C as answer. Thanks Bunuel for these type of questions.. How do i improve my comprehension?
_________________
Ephemeral Epiphany..!
GMATPREP1 590(Q48,V23)










