Author 
Message 
Intern
Joined: 10 Sep 2008
Posts: 36

3
This post received KUDOS
3
This post was BOOKMARKED
Is x > 3? (1) (x  3)(x  2)(x  1) > 0 (2) x > 1 The explanation starts with stating that S1 has three roots. Ok, then X >1 is the correct root of 3 possible roots, according to S2. That leaves us with X>1, not X>3. Where is X>3 derived from? That does not make sense to me.
Also, assuming we don't think about roots and we just start filling in S1 numbers (as I did during the test). If I put in 3 or anything less, the product is either negative (If X is less than 1) or zero if X is 1, 2 or 3. With that reasoning, I see the answer as Yes, X>3, only needing S1 information.
Thank you!



CIO
Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 1218

Re: M03 #01 [#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Sep 2008, 00:20
7
This post received KUDOS
Hi dczuchta. In the question we need to know for sure if \(X \gt 3\). Let's see what S1 and S2 can give us. As stated in the S1, solving for \(X\) gives us \(X \in (1,2) \cup (3,\infty)\) (\(X\) is either greater than 3 or lies in the range from 1 to 2)  insufficient. S2 only gives us \(X \gt 1\) (\(X\) can be 2, which is less than 3)  insufficient. Combining the two statements adds nothing. Therefore E. Hope this helps.
_________________
Welcome to GMAT Club! Want to solve GMAT questions on the go? GMAT Club iPhone app will help. Please read this before posting in GMAT Club Tests forum Result correlation between real GMAT and GMAT Club Tests Are GMAT Club Test sets ordered in any way? Take 15 free tests with questions from GMAT Club, Knewton, Manhattan GMAT, and Veritas.
GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savings



Intern
Joined: 08 Apr 2008
Posts: 37
Location: India

Re: M03 #01 [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Dec 2008, 04:49
1
This post received KUDOS
From the statement 1 & 2 let us take the value for x > 1 and not (3,2,1)
Case 1: Take the value for x as 3>x>2 then (ve)(+ve)(+ve) so the end reulst will be ve Case 2: Take the value for 2>x>1 then (ve)(ve)(+ve) so the end result will be +ve
hence both the statements are not sufficient



SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1895
Schools: CBS, Kellogg

Re: M03 #01 [#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Jan 2009, 06:24
2
This post received KUDOS
E is the best 1. (x3)(x2)(x1)>0 x belongs to (1,2) and x>3; clearly not suff Ex: x=4, Ok x>3, but x=1.5, not OK, x<3 2. x>1, the same as above 1 and 2 : not suff
_________________
GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savings



SVP
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2473

Re: M03 #01 [#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Jan 2009, 11:13
bhatiagp wrote: Can someone please explain the solution as I am unable to comprehend the answer given
Is x>3
1) (x3)(x2)(x1) >0 2) x>1
My Answer was A . But the mentioned Answer is E . I had ruled any ways ruled out B, D , but cannot understand why A is incorrect. Please explain sreehari1250 wrote: From the statement 1 & 2 let us take the value for x > 1 and not (3,2,1)
Case 1: Take the value for x as 3>x>2 then (ve)(+ve)(+ve) so the end reulst will be ve Case 2: Take the value for 2>x>1 then (ve)(ve)(+ve) so the end result will be +ve
hence both the statements are not sufficient 1: 3 > x > 2 is not valied for (x3) (x2) (x1)> 0 cuz if 3>x>2, (x3) (x2) (x1) becomes ve, which is not the statement 1. so x has to be either (2 > x > 1) or > 3. so insuffff. 2: if x > 1, x could be in between 1 and 2 excluding (2 > x > 1) or greater than 3. so again insuff. togather also same repeats. therefore, E.
_________________
Verbal: http://gmatclub.com/forum/newtotheverbalforumpleasereadthisfirst77546.html Math: http://gmatclub.com/forum/newtothemathforumpleasereadthisfirst77764.html Gmat: http://gmatclub.com/forum/everythingyouneedtoprepareforthegmatrevised77983.html
GT



SVP
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2473

Re: M03 #01 [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Jan 2009, 14:43
1
This post received KUDOS
kman wrote: Is \(x \gt 3\) ?
1. \((x3)(x2)(x1) \gt 0\) 2. \(x \gt 1\)
Can someone explain. I have a problem with the OA 1: \((x3)(x2)(x1) \gt 0\) If x = 5 or 1.5, the condition is met. 2: \(x \gt 1\) Again, if x = 5 or 1.5, the condition is met. not suff. E.
_________________
Verbal: http://gmatclub.com/forum/newtotheverbalforumpleasereadthisfirst77546.html Math: http://gmatclub.com/forum/newtothemathforumpleasereadthisfirst77764.html Gmat: http://gmatclub.com/forum/everythingyouneedtoprepareforthegmatrevised77983.html
GT



Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Posts: 495
Location: Kolkata

Re: M03 #01 [#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Apr 2009, 02:26
GMAT TIGER wrote: kman wrote: Is \(x \gt 3\) ?
1. \((x3)(x2)(x1) \gt 0\) 2. \(x \gt 1\)
Can someone explain. I have a problem with the OA 1: \((x3)(x2)(x1) \gt 0\) If x = 5 or 1.5, the condition is met. 2: \(x \gt 1\) Again, if x = 5 or 1.5, the condition is met. not suff. E. this is too much of a trial error..how did you choose 1.5?i actually did the same method and chose 2.5.It being sufficient i got the answer wrong.Could someone pls explain the answer that is given officially?(given below) Statement (1) by itself is insufficient. The polynomial has roots . They are distinct, which means that the polynomial changes its sign around the roots. If is greater than 3, then it is positive. If is between 2 and 3 then it is negative, between 1 and 2, positive, and below 1, negative. S1 therefore limits to . can be either greater or less than 3.therefore,stat 1 is insufficient. concept is not clear.Pls help!



Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Mar 2009
Posts: 367
Location: PDX

Re: M03 #01 [#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Apr 2009, 18:20
1
This post received KUDOS
suyashjhawar wrote: GMAT TIGER wrote: kman wrote: Is \(x \gt 3\) ?
1. \((x3)(x2)(x1) \gt 0\) 2. \(x \gt 1\)
Can someone explain. I have a problem with the OA 1: \((x3)(x2)(x1) \gt 0\) If x = 5 or 1.5, the condition is met. 2: \(x \gt 1\) Again, if x = 5 or 1.5, the condition is met. not suff. E. this is too much of a trial error..how did you choose 1.5?i actually did the same method and chose 2.5.It being sufficient i got the answer wrong.Could someone pls explain the answer that is given officially?(given below) Statement (1) by itself is insufficient. The polynomial has roots . They are distinct, which means that the polynomial changes its sign around the roots. If is greater than 3, then it is positive. If is between 2 and 3 then it is negative, between 1 and 2, positive, and below 1, negative. S1 therefore limits to . can be either greater or less than 3.therefore,stat 1 is insufficient. concept is not clear.Pls help! Correct me if am wrong here: Statement 1 : Lets look at it like this: Since (x3) (x2) (x1) > 0 Either x3 > 0 or x2 >0 or x1>0 So we have x>3 or x>2 or x>1 So : If x>3 it implies x>2 and x>1 What if x>2 ... then it does not imply x>3 and similarly if x>1 it does not imply x>3. Hence this option is insufficient. From Stmnt 2: x>1 Well this is again insufficient. Combining both: We have x>1 AND x>3 or x>2 or x>1 So option 2 is just reemphasizing a part of what is stated in option 1. We still have x>3 or x>2. Which still leaves us with no conclusive answer. Hence Choose E. I'm not a big fan of picking numbers  but hope this helps. pradeep
_________________
In the land of the night, the chariot of the sun is drawn by the grateful dead



Director
Joined: 25 Oct 2008
Posts: 596
Location: Kolkata,India

Re: M03 #01 [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Aug 2009, 18:58
1
This post received KUDOS
I did it the pleonasm way!However could somebody explain me the concept of roots cos i didn't get the sign changing around values thing.. The polynomial has roots (x2)(x3)(x1) . They are distinct, which means that the polynomial changes its sign around the roots. If is greater than 3, then it is positive. If is between 2 and 3 then it is negative, between 1 and 2, positive, and below 1, negative. x is therefore limited to (1,2)U(3,infinity)
_________________
http://gmatclub.com/forum/countdownbeginshasended8548340.html#p649902



CIO
Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 1218

Re: M03 #01 [#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Aug 2009, 00:12
2
This post received KUDOS
I'm no Math expert but I'll share what I know. Suppose you have the inequality \((x2)(x3)(x1) > 0\). 1. The first thing to do is calculate the values of \(x\) when the whole expression equals 0. These values might be called "roots" as well. So the roots for this inequality are 1, 2, and 3. 2. The second thing you do is sketch a simple number line with the roots found (1, 2, and 3 in our example). 3. The third thing is calculating the sign of the whole expression for \(x\) in different ranges formed on the number line above and marking those ranges with "+" or "". Let's plug 0 into the expression to see what sign it will get: \((x2)\) is negative, \((x3)\) is negative, and \((x1)\) is also negative. So the whole expression is negative for \(x\) from the \((\infty,1)\) range. You can repeat the same operation for all ranges and find out the sign but it is usually sufficient to do only for one range because the sign of the whole expression changes in the next range on the number line. The signs for the next ranges will be "+", "", and "+". You can check if you want to. So, we are sure that \(x \in (1,2) \cup (3,\infty)\). Hope this helped somebody . tejal777 wrote: I did it the pleonasm way!However could somebody explain me the concept of roots cos i didn't get the sign changing around values thing..
The polynomial has roots (x2)(x3)(x1) . They are distinct, which means that the polynomial changes its sign around the roots. If is greater than 3, then it is positive. If is between 2 and 3 then it is negative, between 1 and 2, positive, and below 1, negative. x is therefore limited to (1,2)U(3,infinity)
_________________
Welcome to GMAT Club! Want to solve GMAT questions on the go? GMAT Club iPhone app will help. Please read this before posting in GMAT Club Tests forum Result correlation between real GMAT and GMAT Club Tests Are GMAT Club Test sets ordered in any way? Take 15 free tests with questions from GMAT Club, Knewton, Manhattan GMAT, and Veritas.
GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savings



Intern
Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 21

Re: M03 #01 [#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Jan 2010, 07:05
1
This post received KUDOS
1. (X3)(X2)(X1) > 0
You have 2 possibilities: X3>0 x2>0 x1>0 You got: x>3 or x3<0 x2<0 x1>0 You got: 1<x<2 so 1 is insuficient.
2. x>1, also insuficient.
Answer: E



Intern
Joined: 15 Nov 2009
Posts: 31
Location: Moscow, Russia

Re: M03 #01 [#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Jan 2010, 07:38
Just sketch the graph of y=(x1)(x2)(x3) and get the answer E.



Manager
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 164

Re: M03 #01 [#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Jan 2010, 08:08
2. x > 1
clear it can't be B since x can be 2 or 4 so option 2 is insufficient.
1.(x3)(x2)(x1) > 0
if x is 1.5 then the value of the above equation will (1.5)(0.5)(0.5) > 0
if x is 10 then the value of the above equation still positive (7)(8)(9) >0
so choice 1 is also insufficient
since we picked numbers 1.5 and 10 which is x > 1 so combining both the statements we won't able to get to the answer
so the answer must be E



Kaplan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 21 Jun 2010
Posts: 148
Location: Toronto

Re: M03 #01 [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Aug 2010, 17:08
seekmba wrote: Is \(x>3\) ? 1. \((x3)(x2)(x1) > 0\) 2. \(x > 1\) Step 1 of the Kaplan Method for DS: Analyze the StemWe see "is", we think "yes/no" question. So, if x is always greater than 3, sufficient; if x is never greater than 3, sufficient. If sometimes x is greater than 3 and sometimes it isn't, insufficient. Step 2 of the Kaplan Method for DS: Evaluate the Statements(2)\(x > 1\). Well, x could be \(1.5\) ("no") or x could be \(5\) ("yes")... insufficient, eliminate B and D. (1) for the product of 3 numbers to be positive, there are two possibilities: \((+)()()\) or \((+)(+)(+)\) so, we have to examine both cases. In the first case, we could pick\(x = 1.5\), giving us \((1.5)(.5)(.5)\) which is greater than 0. Is \(1.5 > 3\)? NO In the second case, we could pick \(x = 5\), giving us \((2)(3)(4)\)which is greater than 0. Is \(5 > 3\)? YES Yes and no answer, insufficient: eliminate A. Combined: \(x=1.5\) and \(x=5\)worked for both statements, so they're both still valid choices. Accordingly, we can still get a NO and a YES answer: insufficient, choose E.



Manager
Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Posts: 225

Re: M03 #01 [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Aug 2010, 17:20
seekmba wrote: Is \(x>3\) ? 1. \((x3)(x2)(x1) > 0\) 2. x > 1 1. x>3 and x>2 and x>1 therefore we don't know if x is greater than 3 because x could be greater than 1... INSUFFICIENT 2. \(x>1\) if x=2 the answer to the question is no, if x=4 answer to the question is yes > INSUFFICIENT combined, x>1, which is the same like B, therefore E
Last edited by zisis on 29 Aug 2010, 18:04, edited 1 time in total.



Kaplan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 21 Jun 2010
Posts: 148
Location: Toronto

Re: M03 #01 [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Aug 2010, 17:32
zisis wrote: seekmba wrote: Is \(x>3\) ? 1. \((x3)(x2)(x1) > 0\) 2. x > 1 1. \(x>3 and x>2 x>1\) therefore we don't know if x is greater than 3 because x could be greater than 1... INSUFFICIENT Not sure how you derived that inequality, but it's false (in fact, it's impossible.. there's no number greater than 1 that's also greater than two times itself).



CEO
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2784
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31 GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35

Re: M03 #01 [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Aug 2010, 18:42
1
This post received KUDOS
seekmba wrote: Is \(x>3\) ? 1. \((x3)(x2)(x1) > 0\) 2. x > 1 Use the following approach with your all such inequality questions. Attachment:
nl.jpg [ 17.81 KiB  Viewed 8248 times ]
Arrange the roots of the equal in the increasing order and create separators in the form of curves as shown. Start from the right most i.e. x>0 to be +ve and put alternate ve , +ve signs as you move along the left side of the number line. If the inequality says p(x) > 0 then the domain of the inequality is in +ve curve. If the inequality says p(x) < 0 then the domain of the inequality is in ve curve. For the given question in the statement 1  p(x) > 0 => consider +ve curve i.e. \(x>3\) and \(2>x>1\) This is not sufficient as \(2>x>1\) is also there and we can not the question whether x>3 or not. Consider the 2nd statement. x>1 does not answer the question x>3 as x>1 could be 2 or 4. 2 will give the answer "No" to the given question whereas 4 will give "yes". Thus not sufficient. Take both the statements together. we have \(2>x>1\), \(x>3\) and \(x>1\) When we combine all the given three inequalities we still can not answer as x=1.5 and x = 4 will give different answer to the question. Thus E
_________________
Fight for your dreams :For all those who fear from Verbal lets give it a fight
Money Saved is the Money Earned
Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal
Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog/Facebook
GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savings
Gmat test review : http://gmatclub.com/forum/670to710alongjourneywithoutdestinationstillhappy141642.html



VP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1492

Re: M03 #01 [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Aug 2010, 19:38
Hey gurpreetsingh, thanks for the detailed explanation but this approach is difficult to absorb for my brain. I wish I could solve the questions in the manner you did.... I used the same approach as "zisis" and hence messed it up. Thanks skovinsky. I should have done something like you showed.



Manager
Joined: 23 Oct 2010
Posts: 84
Location: India

Re: M03 #01 [#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Jan 2011, 16:09
E.
S1 gives three roots of equation and is true in two conditions: either all are positive or two of them are negative. If x is positive then equations are x > 1 or x > 2 or x > 3 => x > 3 for two negative => 1 insufficient s2 says x> 1 insuff
combining together s2 does not give extra information and hence e
Posted from my mobile device



Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2010
Posts: 288
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Marketing
GMAT Date: 08272012
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Manufacturing)

Re: M03 #01 [#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Jan 2011, 21:46
tejal777 wrote: I did it the pleonasm way!However could somebody explain me the concept of roots cos i didn't get the sign changing around values thing..
The polynomial has roots (x2)(x3)(x1) . They are distinct, which means that the polynomial changes its sign around the roots. If is greater than 3, then it is positive. If is between 2 and 3 then it is negative, between 1 and 2, positive, and below 1, negative. x is therefore limited to (1,2)U(3,infinity) Hey , here is my explanation. it might help you to understand. here we go, the question is x>3 ? statement 1:(x1)(x2)(x3) >0 statement 2: x>1 starting with statement 1 : FOR (x1)(x2)(x3) >0 there are 3 condition for which this eq will be +ve case 1: (x1)>0 , (x2) >0, (x3) >0 ; on plotting the point on number line, we will get x>3 ( chk with no 4) case 2: (x1)<0, (x2) <0, (x3) >0 ;; on plotting the point on number line, we will get 2<x<1 ( chk with no 1.5) case 3: (x1)<0, (x2) > 0, (x3) <0; ; on plotting the point on number line, we will get 2<x<1 ( chk with no 1.5) case 4: (x1)>0, (x2) < 0, (x3) <0; ; on plotting the point on number line, we will get 3<x<2 ( chk with no 2.5) so, from here we cant say that x>3. statement 2: x>1; doesn't say anything at all. (chk with x=1.5,2.5) on combining these two statements we cant find anything as we will get the same case as said in CASE 4. so, either of the statement cant answer this question alone or on combination. so, final ans is E.
_________________
kudos me if you like my post.
Attitude determine everything. all the best and God bless you.







Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 28 posts ]




