Hi
BunuelI am confused by the explanation for (1)
How can we assume that he won all the games after his first 20 games?
Given: For the first 20 games, 5W and 15L.
It is stated that he played all his remaining matches, not stated that he won all of them.
So. let's assume that the player played M matches.
Now moving to what statement (1) offers:
It says player would have lost 30 more games than he actually did.
However, we do not know how many games in total the player lost actually. It's only given he had lost 15 games in his first 20 games.
So another variable 'L' for total losses.
acc to (1): if 25%M= Total Wins (W)
then L is L + 30
I could not understand any further, there were too many variables and I concluded that statement (1) is not enough.
Please tell me where my approach went wrong and also how the official explanation for (1) has "The player won 25% of his first 20 games and 100% of the remaining games"