Hi
BunuelI still can't get the logic as to the logic of getting the amount of total distance, there seems to be a jump from 150 from statement (1) to the 300 in the (1)+(2)
Analyzing your statements
- "From (1), we know that in the
first 2 hours, the bus covered a distance of
150 miles"
sure, I have no problem
- "From (2), we know that it took the bus
2 hours to cover the first
half of the distance"
There is nowhere in the text that indicates the two hours from the first statement is the actual distance, statement (1) only says that it
takes 2 hours and a 150 miles, nothing about the 150 miles being half of the distance. Thus, since we don't know the remaining distance, we cannot get the average.
It would be different if statement (2) said that it took 2 hrs to reach half of the distance eg "The average speed of the bus for the first half of the distance was twice its average speed for the second half of the distance
and the bus took 2 hrs to cover half the distance"or statement (1) said that the 150 is half of the distance eg "In the first 2 hours, the bus covered a distance of 150 miles
which is half of the distance required"
There is a disconnect between the two
please advise
Bunuel wrote:
Ashu101 wrote:
Why do we assume that first half of the distance is 150 miles. As nowhere it is mentioned that the first 2 hours of the trip has covered half of the distance. Please can I get a more detailed explanation for this.
Read carefully:
(1)+(2) From (1), we know that in the
first 2 hours, the bus covered a distance of
150 miles. From (2), we know that it took the bus
2 hours to cover the first
half of the distance. Consequently, the entire journey was 300 miles long. As it took 6 hours to cover this distance, the average speed for the entire trip was 300/6 = 50 miles per hour. Sufficient.
first 2 hours -->
150 miles2 hours -->
half of the distanceHence,
150 miles =
half of the distance.