GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 17 Aug 2018, 08:08

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Apr 2013
Posts: 131
Location: India
WE: Supply Chain Management (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Nov 2013, 04:07
Agree. E is the answer.

D is a trap answer.

The sound of a boat engine generally travels much further under water than it
does through the air.


It says that sound travels much further under water than it does through air. The choice is more generic and does not say anything about the manatees' hearing capacity.
_________________

+1 KUDOS is the best way to say thanks :-)

"Pay attention to every detail"

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2013
Posts: 158
Re: Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Feb 2014, 07:22
+1 E

The conclusion here is that slow boats emit lower pitch sounds and since manatee are unable to hear low pitch sounds, the situation can become worst with slow boats. The hearing ability of manatees is what the conclusion depends on, and must be targeted.

E clearly shows that sound hardly plays any role in alertness of manatee. hence it weakens the conclusion.

D is tempting, but it fails to explain why manatees collide with faster moving boats. faster boats emit higher pitch sounds and should in fact alert the manatees.
_________________

Click on Kudos if you liked the post!

Practice makes Perfect.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Oh GMAT ! I give you one more shot :)
Joined: 14 Feb 2013
Posts: 89
Location: United States (MI)
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 580 Q44 V28
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Feb 2014, 08:06
mejia401 wrote:
Conclusion: Therefore, this approach may in fact make things worse rather than better.

Reasoning: High boat speeds kills manatees. Slow boat speeds kills more manatees because manatees cannot hear any sound. To weaken the argument, the statement must provide that slow boat speeds do not kill any more than high boat speeds. (Wrong answers are neutral or provide reasons why slow boat speeds do kill more manatees than high boat speeds.)

A. The areas where boats would have to maintain low speeds were decided partly on the basis of manatee-population estimates and partly from numbers of reported
collisions between manatees and boats. Neutral. Statement does not cast doubt.

B. Because the water hyacinth that manatees feed on grows best in water that is nearly still, water hyacinth beds can be disturbed or damaged by fast-moving boat
traffic.Wrong. Statement provides a reason why more manatees are present in waters with slow boat speeds.

C. Over the last several decades, boat traffic in Florida’s coastal waters has been increasing almost continuously and now represents the greatest threat to the
endangered manatee population. Neutral. More boats kill more manatees; nothing about boat speeds.

D. The sound of a boat engine generally travels much further under water than it does through the air. Opposite answer - admittedly, this one threw me off. I forgot if this question were a strengthen or weaken, and key words such as "engine" + "travel much further" made a good trap. Brain fail.

E. When experimenters exposed manatees to the recorded sounds of boats moving at various speeds, the creatures were unable to discern the sounds over normal
background noise. OK - that slow boat speeds do not kill any more than high boat speeds.



So you are saying that sound is the only thing that can kill manatees. If I am hit by a ball at 5 mph it might sting a little but if I am hit by the same ball at 50 mpg I might die. Basic physics 101
_________________

Life is a highway
I wanna ride it all night long

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 234
GMAT 1: 620 Q44 V31
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 3: 610 Q47 V28
GMAT 4: 700 Q50 V34
GMAT 5: 700 Q49 V36
GMAT 6: 690 Q48 V35
GMAT 7: 750 Q49 V42
GMAT 8: 730 Q50 V39
Re: Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 May 2014, 17:34
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 234
GMAT 1: 620 Q44 V31
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 3: 610 Q47 V28
GMAT 4: 700 Q50 V34
GMAT 5: 700 Q49 V36
GMAT 6: 690 Q48 V35
GMAT 7: 750 Q49 V42
GMAT 8: 730 Q50 V39
Re: Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Oct 2014, 12:24
2
5
Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal waters, swim close to the surface and are frequently killed in collisions with boats. To address the problem, boat traffic in manatee-populated waters is being required to maintain very low speeds. Unfortunately, manatees are unable to hear low-pitched sounds and a boat’s sound lowers in pitch as the boat slows. Therefore, this approach may in fact make things worse rather than better.

Which of the following, if true, casts most doubt on the conclusion?

A. The areas where boats would have to maintain low speeds were decided partly on the basis of manatee-population estimates and partly from numbers of reported
collisions between manatees and boats.
B. Because the water hyacinth that manatees feed on grows best in water that is nearly still, water hyacinth beds can be disturbed or damaged by fast-moving boat
traffic.
C. Over the last several decades, boat traffic in Florida’s coastal waters has been increasing almost continuously and now represents the greatest threat to the
endangered manatee population.
D. The sound of a boat engine generally travels much further under water than it does through the air.
E. When experimenters exposed manatees to the recorded sounds of boats moving at various speeds, the creatures were unable to discern the sounds over normal
background noise.

Posted here, because the OA is not provided in other topics.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 May 2014
Posts: 88
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
Schools: HKUST '15, ISB '15
GMAT Date: 12-26-2014
GPA: 3
Re: Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Oct 2014, 02:32
4
TooLong150 wrote:
Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal waters, swim close to the surface and are frequently killed in collisions with boats. To address the problem, boat traffic in manatee-populated waters is being required to maintain very low speeds. Unfortunately, manatees are unable to hear low-pitched sounds and a boat’s sound lowers in pitch as the boat slows. Therefore, this approach may in fact make things worse rather than better.

Which of the following, if true, casts most doubt on the conclusion?


Premise 1: aquatic mammals are frequently killed in collisions with boats.
Premise 2: manatees are unable to hear low-pitched sounds and a boat’s sound lowers in pitch as the boat slows.
Conclusion: slowing the boat may in fact make things worse rather than better..........If the boat is slow, Manatees will not be able to hear the sound and will have more collsions.


A. The areas where boats would have to maintain low speeds were decided partly on the basis of manatee-population estimates and partly from numbers of reported
collisions between manatees and boats.
Incorrect: Our of scope.It doesn't matter how the speed of boat is defined.
B. Because the water hyacinth that manatees feed on grows best in water that is nearly still, water hyacinth beds can be disturbed or damaged by fast-moving boat
traffic.
Incorrect: Our of scope.It doesn't matter how the speed of boat is defined.
C. Over the last several decades, boat traffic in Florida’s coastal waters has been increasing almost continuously and now represents the greatest threat to the
endangered manatee population.
Incorrect:Although it is very tempting but the argument says frequently killed in collisions with boat ,To address the problem.So, we are only considered with mammals killed directly by collision.
D. The sound of a boat engine generally travels much further under water than it does through the air.
Incorrect: Our of scope.It doesn't matter how much farther the sound travels in two mediums.
E. When experimenters exposed manatees to the recorded sounds of boats moving at various speeds, the creatures were unable to discern the sounds over normal
background noise.
Correct: If manatees are not able to differentiate between the sound of high speed and the sound of low speed boat then slowing is NOT worsening the situation

Press Kudos if it helps.
_________________

Success has been and continues to be defined as Getting up one more time than you have been knocked down.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2014
Posts: 174
Re: Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2015, 07:06
TooLong150 wrote:
Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal waters, swim close to the surface and are frequently killed in collisions with boats. To address the problem, boat traffic in manatee-populated waters is being required to maintain very low speeds. Unfortunately, manatees are unable to hear low-pitched sounds and a boat’s sound lowers in pitch as the boat slows. Therefore, this approach may in fact make things worse rather than better.

Which of the following, if true, casts most doubt on the conclusion?

A. The areas where boats would have to maintain low speeds were decided partly on the basis of manatee-population estimates and partly from numbers of reported
collisions between manatees and boats.
B. Because the water hyacinth that manatees feed on grows best in water that is nearly still, water hyacinth beds can be disturbed or damaged by fast-moving boat
traffic.
C. Over the last several decades, boat traffic in Florida’s coastal waters has been increasing almost continuously and now represents the greatest threat to the
endangered manatee population.
D. The sound of a boat engine generally travels much further under water than it does through the air.
E. When experimenters exposed manatees to the recorded sounds of boats moving at various speeds, the creatures were unable to discern the sounds over normal
background noise.



Posted here, because the OA is not provided in other topics.

ITS E.E says that creatures are not able to distinguish between high n low pitch sounds.So,situation cannot be worse.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 500
Concentration: Technology, Other
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jul 2016, 21:44
Top Contributor
My 2 cents:

P1: Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal waters, swim close to the surface and are frequently killed in collisions with boats.
P2: To address the problem, boat traffic in manatee-populated waters is being required to maintain very low speeds.
P3: Unfortunately, manatees are unable to hear low-pitched sounds and a boat’s sound lowers in pitch as the boat slows.

Conc: Therefore, this approach may in fact make things worse rather than better.

Problem#1 is HS. The solution to this problem creates another problem that is LS, Pob#2.
Few assumptions: Author assumes that fish can hear the sound and can make out the difference between HPS and LPS.
Lets look out for options that talk about M and sound of boats or can prove that advantages of lowering the speed boat for M would outweighs those of high speed boats.

Which of the following, if true, casts most doubt on the conclusion?

A. The areas where boats would have to maintain low speeds were decided partly on the basis of manatee-population estimates and partly from numbers of reported collisions between manatees and boats.
>> Problem talks abt M and their ability to hear sound. Doesn't give much info. to evaluate the conc. Ignore.
B. Because the water hyacinth that manatees feed on grows best in water that is nearly still, water hyacinth beds can be disturbed or damaged by fast-moving boat traffic.
>> This presents another disadvantage or HS apart from collision. So lowering the speed will have other advantages as well. But does it effect our conc. Can/Can't. Hence lets visit other options.
C. Over the last several decades, boat traffic in Florida’s coastal waters has been increasing almost continuously and now represents the greatest threat to the endangered manatee population.
>> Introducing another problem apart from what mentioned in premise. Ignore.
D. The sound of a boat engine generally travels much further under water than it does through the air.
>> it doesn't help much. Also M travel close to surface. ignore.
E. When experimenters exposed manatees to the recorded sounds of boats moving at various speeds, the creatures were unable to discern the sounds over normal background noise.
>> This mentions about M ability to distinguish between sounds of boat moving at various speed and background noise. Note this option talks in general abt M's ability to discern sound. Bingo!
_________________

--------------------------------------------------------
Regards :)

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 22 Feb 2016
Posts: 97
Location: India
Concentration: Economics, Healthcare
GMAT 1: 690 Q42 V47
GMAT 2: 710 Q47 V39
GPA: 3.57
Re: Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Sep 2016, 10:02
krypt wrote:
I think the answer is E.

The hypothesis is that boats traveling slow = less manatees killed. However, manatees can't hear slow boats and therefore, slow boats will make the problem WORSE. The argument is saying that boats traveling at various speeds will kill less manatees than all boats traveling slowly on the account that manatees can't hear slow boats.

To cast doubt on this, we can show that manatees can't hear various speeds. Thus, mandating slow boats will not make the problem WORSE, it should stay the same.



Even I am thinking on the same lines. The idea here is weather the new rule will make the situation worse or not. Nothing is mentioned about saving or reducing the number of accidents.
Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 656
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 May 2017, 12:49
The hypothesis is that boats traveling slow = less manatees killed. However, manatees can't hear slow boats and therefore, slow boats will make the problem WORSE. The argument is saying that boats traveling at various speeds will kill less manatees than all boats traveling slowly on the account that manatees can't hear slow boats.

To cast doubt on this, we can show that manatees can't hear various speeds. Thus, mandating slow boats will not make the problem WORSE, it should stay the same.


E says that the manatees were unable to hear the boat noises at any speed that was tested ("various speeds"). In other words, they are already deaf to the boat sounds, so there is no way that things could get worse at lower speeds.

A. The areas where boats would have to maintain low speeds were decided partly on the basis of manatee-population estimates and partly from numbers of reported collisions between manatees and boats. --> This info does not help as it provides information about the environment and nothing else.

B. Because the water hyacinth that manatees feed on grows best in water that is nearly still, water hyacinth beds can be disturbed or damaged by fast-moving boat traffic. --> Water hyacinths do not feature in the argument. So No.

C. Over the last several decades, boat traffic in Florida's coastal waters has been increasing almost continuously and now represents the greatest threat to the endangered manatee population. --> Ok, so the boat population is increasing and is a threat (in spite of the technicalities et al). For keeps.

D. The sound of a boat engine generally travels much further under water than it does through the air. --> But no mention in the premises about the Manatees hearing through air. This comparison does not weaken the logic of the argument in any way. It is not about the speed of sound rather it is about the pitch.

E. When experimenters exposed manatees to the recorded sounds of boats moving at
various speeds, the creatures were unable to discern the sounds over normal
background noise --> So Manatees can actually discern (perceive the change in) sounds and this weakens the argument because it clearly contradicts Unfortunately, manatees are unable to hear low-pitched sounds and a boat's sound lowers in pitch as the boat slows.

E is the best choice here.
_________________

Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch

Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 687
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jul 2017, 04:40
E.
E attacks the conclusion by attacking the method of reasoning. He states that Manes can not hear the sounds of the slow boats . Hence, slow boats make the problem worse. But What if they can not hear any sound at all. Then falsifying the reasoning itself. Stating that It is not the slow boats that make the problem worse but the boats itself and worsening doesn't depend on the speed of the boat.

Hence, My go is with E.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 23 Dec 2013
Posts: 203
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 710 Q45 V41
GMAT 2: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.76
Reviews Badge
Re: Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jul 2017, 19:40
ykaiim wrote:
Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal waters, swim close to the surface and are frequently killed in collisions with boats. To address the problem, boat traffic in manatee-populated waters is being required to maintain very low speeds. Unfortunately, manatees are unable to hear low-pitched sounds and a boat’s sound lowers in pitch as the boat slows. Therefore, this approach may in fact make things worse rather than better.

Which of the following, if true, casts most doubt on the conclusion?

A. The areas where boats would have to maintain low speeds were decided partly on the basis of manatee-population estimates and partly from numbers of reported collisions between manatees and boats.
B. Because the water hyacinth that manatees feed on grows best in water that is nearly still, water hyacinth beds can be disturbed or damaged by fast-moving boat traffic.
C. Over the last several decades, boat traffic in Florida’s coastal waters has been increasing almost continuously and now represents the greatest threat to the endangered manatee population.
D. The sound of a boat engine generally travels much further under water than it does through the air.
E. When experimenters exposed manatees to the recorded sounds of boats moving at various speeds, the creatures were unable to discern the sounds over normalbackground noise.

I marked the OA by PoE, but I was not much clear on the argument. Can someone explain on the argument and answer choice?


A) Irrelevant to the conclusion. The source of the areas in which boaters must maintain low speeds does not cast doubt on the conclusion.
B) Whether the food source is harmed does not have any bearing on the reduction of boat fatalities of the manatee.
C) That could well be true, but if anything it serves to bolster the conclusion, not weaken it.
D) This fact does not make the conclusion that the reduced boat speeds will make things worse less likely to be true.
E) Correct. If manatees cannot hear the boat engine at any speed, then reducing boat speeds is not going to make the animals more likely to die in boat fatalities. This new info casts doubt on the conclusion that boats traveling at slower speeds will "make things worse" for manatees.
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 634
Premium Member
Re: Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jul 2017, 10:33
Merged topics. Please, search before posting questions!
_________________

Please Read: Verbal Posting Rules

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 24 Aug 2017
Posts: 9
GPA: 3
Reviews Badge
Re: Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Sep 2017, 11:22
amp0201 wrote:
Shell game is like the answer choice most similar to correct one, though not the correct one.

The argument's conclusion is - slower boats might worsen the problem.

Answer choice E says Manatees are not able to hear noises at any levels. Hence the problem won't worsen but will stay same.

Answer choice B is about faster boats and nothing to say about slower boats.

Hence I believe to be E rather than B. Thank You.

Thanks,
Akhil M.Parekh


Just to add shell game answer generally try to answer some other conclusion. In this it is trying to say tat since the food is damaged by fast moving boat, slow moving boat will not cause that damage and hence save the dying population. But the conclusion was that the slow moving boat causes less alertness to the mantees, resulting in higher death. SO yes B helps to say that slow moving boat might help to increase chances of mantees' population, but option fails to answer the issue of alertness.

P.S. Maybe alertness of mantee is much more important than the damaged food
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2018
Posts: 1
Re: Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jul 2018, 07:51
low speed-low sound-couldn't hear-worse

=>Doubt?

O(E): unable to hear => no worse, remains the same
O(B):not even related to the psg (I took B at first T.T)
_________________

Vote for brain

Re: Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal &nbs [#permalink] 24 Jul 2018, 07:51

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 36 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.