Explanation for Question 11. It can be inferred from the passage that the author would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements about organizational culture?A. Organizational culture is the primary determinant of a company's competitive position in a given market.We can see that the author feels that organizational culture is a determinant of a company's competitive position in that the author says, "the organizational culture of such companies can hurt them in the marketplace," and says, "effective distribution, marketing, and accounting systems ... can act as entry barriers, deterring would-be competitors from entering a particular market."
However, this choice has a failure point in that the author does not indicate that organizational culture is "the primary (most important) determinant" of a company's competitive position in a given market.
After all the fact that the organizational culture of a company "can hurt" it in the marketplace or support the existence of "entry barriers" doesn't mean that organizational culture is "the primary determinant" of a company's competitive position.
Eliminate.
B. Many companies' organizational cultures are such that employee contributions in certain areas that might enhance those companies' competitiveness are not rewarded.The author says that "many companies
offer employees incentives such as promotions and bonuses for developing new products, incentives
not offered for innovations in other areas of the business." Companies' offering incentives can be considered ways in which employee contributions are "rewarded."
Then, the author indicates that strength in areas of businesses other than new product development, such as "distribution, marketing, and accounting systems," can enhance companies' competitiveness.
We see that, if the author is saying that incentives, i.e. rewards, are not offered in areas of the business other than new product development and that strength in areas of businesses other than new product development can enhance competitiveness, then the author would likely agree that "Many companies' organizational cultures are such that employee contributions in certain areas that might enhance those companies' competitiveness are not rewarded."
Keep.
C. The narrowness of many companies' organizational cultures is evident in those companies' failure to reward sufficiently those employees who help to develop successful new products.This choice is basically the opposite of what the author discusses in the passage.
The author discusses companies that "offer employees incentives such as promotions and bonuses for developing new products, incentives not offered for innovations in other areas of the business" and describes these companies a having "a narrow focus on product development."
So, the author seems to believe that companies that do, rather than fail to, reward "employees who help to develop new products" have narrow company cultures
Meanwhile, the author never indicates that companies that do not "reward sufficiently those employees who help to develop successful new products" have narrow company cultures.
Eliminate.
D. A company's organizational culture is likely to undergo significant change if the company is able to develop a new product and market it successfully.The author indicates that a company's organizational culture can be affected by "the potential benefits of successful product innovation" and by "measurement systems" but not by the actual development and successful marketing of a new product.
Eliminate.
E. The nature of a company's organizational culture tends to be more evident in its distribution system than in its degree of commitment to new product development.In discussing companies that "are making new product development a central element of their competitive strategy," the author talks as if focus on "new product development" is a defining aspect of these companies' cultures, and the author does not indicate in any way that a company's "distribution system" indicates more about the company's culture than "the company's degree of commitment to new product development."
So, we have no reason to believe that the author would be likely to agree with this choice.
Eliminate.
The correct answer is (B).
Explanation for Question 22. The primary purpose of the passage is toA. explain the way in which a particular aspect of organizational culture affects employees' performanceThis choice is tricky since the passage does mention "incentives" offered to employees, which would likely "affect employees' performance."
However, if we carefully review what the passage says, rather than going with vibe or a vague impression of what the passage says, we see that, in actuality, the passage never once mentions how anything affects employees' performance.
Eliminate.
B. explain why new product development confers less advantage on companies today than it did in the pastThe passage never compares how much advantage new product development confers today with how much it did in the past and never says anything about today versus the past.
Eliminate.
C. argue that a particular strategy for enhancing a company's position against competitors may prove unsuccessfulTo me, this choice is not a perfect answer because the passage does not really directly argue that companies' "making new product development a central element of their competitive strategy" may prove unsuccessful. Rather, the passage discusses reasons why that strategy may not be ideal without ever stating the conclusion that it "may prove unsuccessful."
At the same time, what the passage says does support the conclusion that focusing on new product development "may prove unsuccessful." So, the passage can be considered effectively an argument that the strategy of focusing on new product development may prove unsuccessful.
Keep.
D. argue that a company's organizational culture may be more important than its competitive strategy in ensuring financial successRather than compare the importance of a company's organizational culture with that of its competitive strategy, the passage indicates that a company's organizational culture results in it's competitive strategy. So, basically, the passage indicates that the two are interwoven rather than indicates that one is more important than the other in ensuring financial success.
Eliminate.
E. suggest a way in which companies can increase their profits without developing new productsThe passage does mention some ways in which companies can enhance competitiveness other than by developing new products. However, mentioning those ways is not the primary purpose of the passage. Rather, those ways are mentioned in the context of a broader discussion of the effects of focusing narrowly on product development.
Also, the author never says that the mentioned ways of enhancing competitiveness can use used by companies to "increase their profits without developing new products." Rather, the author discusses using those way in contexts that could involve developing, or copying, new products, saying that "competitors with better distribution systems may copy the product and introduce it into the market before the innovator can profit from its innovation" and that "strong overall business systems ... can act as entry barriers, deterring would-be competitors from entering a particular market," which market the company could have entered by developing a new product.
So, this choice both is too narrow to capture the primary purpose and does not match what the passage does.
Eliminate.
The correct answer is (C).
Explanation for Question 33. The passage suggests which of the following about companies' investment in the development of new products?A. Heavy investment in the development of new products is a less risky business practice than most business leaders believe.If anything, this choice conflicts with what the passage says. After all, the passage indicates that "a narrow focus on product development can ultimately detract from a firm's performance," which could be taken as indicating that "heavy investment in the development of new products" may be more risky than the leaders who engage in it believe.
Eliminate.
B. Companies might invest less heavily in the development of new products if company executives felt equally able to measure the results of investments in all areas of business innovation.In the first paragraph, the passage says the following in the context of discussing the fact that "Many companies today are making new product development a central element of their competitive strategy.":
Firms' priorities can also be shaped by their measurement systems since these systems can directly measure returns from new products more immediately than they can measure returns from investments in such areas as organizational restructuring or innovations in marketing.We see that the passage is suggesting that one reason why companies "are making new product development a central element of their competitive strategy" is simply that they can measure the effects of new product development more immediately than they can measure the effects of investments in other areas.
So, in effect, the passage is also suggesting what this choice says. After all, if companies focus on product development because they can measure its effects better than they can the effects of other investments, then it follows that they "might invest less heavily in the development of new products if company executives felt equally able to measure the results of investments in all areas of business innovation."
Keep
C. Companies are most likely to focus their investment on the development of new products if they perceive competitors to lack strong overall business systems.The passage never suggests this. In fact, it suggest that companies may focus their investment on the development of new products even though competitors have strong overall business systems, mentioning this type of situation: "If a company develops a superior new product but is unable to distribute and promote it rapidly, competitors with better distribution systems may copy the product and introduce it into the market before the innovator can profit from its innovation."
Eliminate.
D. While investment in the development of new products can bring greater returns to companies than can investment in other areas of a business, the benefits are usually short-lived.This choice may have the vibe of being correct, but it's not supported by the passage. In fact it has multiple failure points.
For one thing, the passage never says that "development of new products can bring
greater returns to companies than can investment in other areas of a business." If we look carefully, we see that it says that the "potential benefits" of development of new products include "superior financial returns," but the passage does not say that other investments cannot also lead to "superior financial returns," which are returns greater than those achieved by other companies rather than greater than those achieved by investing in other ways.
Also, one of the "potential benefits" of investment in development of new products the passage mentions is "prolonged growth." So, we see that the passage does not say that the benefits are "usually short-lived." Rather, for all we know from what the passage says, they are often "prolonged."
Eliminate.
E. It is generally more expensive for companies to invest in the development of new products than to invest in such things as organizational restructuring or the development of new marketing practices.The passage never compares how expensive it is for companies to invest in the development of new products with how expensive it is to invest in such things as organizational restructuring or the development of new marketing practices. In fact, the passage never mentions how expensive any investments are. It focuses on the effects of the investments.
Eliminate.
The correct answer is (B).
_________________
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.comContact me for a free consultation.