Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 30 May 2017, 00:30

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 03 Jul 2005
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 13 [1] , given: 0

Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Aug 2005, 21:23
1
KUDOS
8
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

63% (02:06) correct 37% (01:09) wrong based on 994 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the number of police personnel "walking the beat" should lead to lowering rates of crime, as well as lowering fears about public safety, a surge in public confidence in the police, and a lessening of the economic burden of street crime.

a) lowering rates of crime, as well as lowering fears about public safety

b) a lowering of crime rates and of fears about public safety

c) a lowering of crime rates, along with fears about public safety

d) crime rates being lowered, along with fears about public safety

e) crime rates and fears about public safety being lowered, with.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by fameatop on 22 Sep 2013, 19:27, edited 1 time in total.
If you have any questions
New!
Director
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 718
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2005, 05:06
B it is,

Lowering is used for crime rates and fears both...

Rest all have problems. They use along with, as well as and other unncessary wordier words...
Intern
Joined: 03 Jul 2005
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Aug 2005, 05:02
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Yes you guys are right. OA is B.

When i posted this question I had a question regarding the use of 'and'. But i looked up a similar question in OG and found that 'along with' is wrong because it seems as if 'along with fears about public safety' is a seperate effect. But infact the 'a lowering of crime rates' is what also causes a 'lowering of fears about public safety' so it should be co-ordinated with 'and'

So from this is it safe to say: We use 'and' in a series such as the one we have here, when we want to emphasize an effect (lowering of fears about public safety ) because of another related cause (a lowering of crime rates) ?
Intern
Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 16

Re: Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2013, 12:29
And choice 'e' is the passive voice. Incorrect. Must be 'b'.
Manager
Joined: 14 Jan 2013
Posts: 153
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT Date: 08-01-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 287 [0], given: 30

Re: Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Jan 2014, 23:46
Guys,

I am not clear why " a" is wrong?
_________________

"Where are my Kudos" ............ Good Question = kudos

"Start enjoying all phases" & all Sections

__________________________________________________________________
http://gmatclub.com/forum/collection-of-articles-on-critical-reasoning-159959.html

http://gmatclub.com/forum/percentages-700-800-level-questions-130588.html

http://gmatclub.com/forum/700-to-800-level-quant-question-with-detail-soluition-143321.html

Intern
Joined: 23 Nov 2013
Posts: 14
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 534

Re: Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jan 2014, 03:59
I am still not clear about "and" in b and "along with" in c....can anyone explain..pls..........
Manager
Joined: 16 Jan 2013
Posts: 178
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 337 [0], given: 56

Re: Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jan 2014, 05:17
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the number of police personnel "walking the beat" should lead to lowering rates of crime, as well as lowering fears about public safety, a surge in public confidence in the police, and a lessening of the economic burden of street crime.

a) lowering rates of crime, as well as lowering fears about public safety
'rates of crime' is wrong usage. for ex. tax rates of Europe, marginal rates of substitution. Also, 'lowering rates...' is not parallel with', 'a surge...' and 'a lessening of ..'

the entities in parallel are noun phrases == noun + prepositional phrase type.

b) a lowering of crime rates and of fears about public safety
Parallelism(stated in option a) maintained.

c) a lowering of crime rates, along with fears about public safety
Parallelism is ruined because crime rates and fears are parallel (within the parallel structure). But this option states that 'lowering of crime rates' and 'fears about public safety' are parallel. This is wrong parallelism.

d) crime rates being lowered, along with fears about public safety
e) crime rates and fears about public safety being lowered, with.
D & E not parallel for reasons mentioned in A
_________________

What are modifiers ??

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10298
Followers: 1001

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 0

Re: Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Sep 2015, 13:44
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Jun 2015
Posts: 258
GMAT 1: 540 Q39 V26
GMAT 2: 680 Q46 V37
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 165

Re: Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2015, 21:31
Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the number of police personnel "walking the beat" should lead to lowering rates of crime, as well as lowering fears about public safety, a surge in public confidence in the police, and a lessening of the economic burden of street crime.

Parallelism is the key here.

I read a book, the apple was eaten by me and my friends were watching the show. This statement uses three different verb forms and hence violates parallelism, which requires that all verbs be in form (of course not at a cost of logic). In the question, the underlined part should be parallel to the boldfaced part.

a) lowering rates of crime, as well as lowering fears about public safety not parallel

b) a lowering of crime rates and of fears about public safety Parallel: a lowering of, a surge in, a lessening of

c) a lowering of crime rates, along with fears about public safety Parallel, but loses the meaning. 'Along with' is changing the mean of what is decreasing'

d) crime rates being lowered, along with fears about public safety Not parallel

e) crime rates and fears about public safety being lowered, with. Not parallel
_________________

Fais de ta vie un rêve et d'un rêve une réalité

Director
Joined: 22 Jun 2014
Posts: 752
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Technology
Schools: IIMA , IIMB, ISB
GMAT 1: 540 Q45 V20
GPA: 2.49
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 317 [0], given: 103

Re: Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Apr 2016, 12:49
karthikmeda wrote:
Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the number of police personnel "walking the beat" should lead to lowering rates of crime, as well as lowering fears about public safety, a surge in public confidence in the police, and a lessening of the economic burden of street crime.

a) lowering rates of crime, as well as lowering fears about public safety
lowering fears is wrong.

b) a lowering of crime rates and of fears about public safety
a lowering of X AND Y : of crime rates and of fears - parallelism.

c) a lowering of crime rates, along with fears about public safety
Meaning is changed- a lowering of crime rates, along with fears (too awkward).

d) crime rates being lowered, along with fears about public safety
lead to X is fine. but lead to being X is incorrect. hence- being lowered is incorrect.

e) crime rates and fears about public safety being lowered, with.
Same as D.
_________________

---------------------------------------------------------------
Target - 720-740
http://gmatclub.com/forum/information-on-new-gmat-esr-report-beta-221111.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/list-of-one-year-full-time-mba-programs-222103.html

Director
Joined: 22 Jun 2014
Posts: 752
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Technology
Schools: IIMA , IIMB, ISB
GMAT 1: 540 Q45 V20
GPA: 2.49
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 317 [0], given: 103

Re: Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Aug 2016, 08:33
karthikmeda wrote:
Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the number of police personnel "walking the beat" should lead to lowering rates of crime, as well as lowering fears about public safety, a surge in public confidence in the police, and a lessening of the economic burden of street crime.

a) lowering rates of crime, as well as lowering fears about public safety
lowering rates, lowering fears are incorrect. who is lowering the rate? here lowering is the gerund not verb. "lowering of" is appropriate. hence wrong. lowering is repeated so not a better choice.

b) a lowering of crime rates and of fears about public safety
lowering of X and of Y. parallel.

c) a lowering of crime rates, along with fears about public safety
crime rates along with fears - wrong.

d) crime rates being lowered, along with fears about public safety
being is inappropriately used here.

e) crime rates and fears about public safety being lowered, with.
being!!
_________________

---------------------------------------------------------------
Target - 720-740
http://gmatclub.com/forum/information-on-new-gmat-esr-report-beta-221111.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/list-of-one-year-full-time-mba-programs-222103.html

Re: Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the   [#permalink] 21 Aug 2016, 08:33
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 Many economic analysts believe that a substantial increase in the numb 6 29 Apr 2017, 03:09
13 So substantial has been the increase in demand for 15 25 Mar 2017, 06:38
2 According to criminologists, the cause of riots among many 4 10 Sep 2016, 01:40
40 Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many 17 07 Sep 2016, 23:15
1 Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many 15 24 Jan 2015, 22:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by