It is currently 16 Dec 2017, 12:54

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 114

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2006, 19:13
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the number of police personnel "walking the beat" should lead to lowering rates of crime, as well as lowering fears about public safety, a surge in public confidence in the police, and a lessening of the economic burden of street crime.

lowering rates of crime, as well as lowering fears about public safety

a lowering of crime rates and of fears about public safety

a lowering of crime rates, along with fears about public safety

crime rates being lowered, along with fears about public safety

crime rates and fears about public safety being lowered, with

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 1337

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2006, 20:58
Riuscita wrote:
Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the number of police personnel "walking the beat" should lead to lowering rates of crime, as well as lowering fears about public safety, a surge in public confidence in the police, and a lessening of the economic burden of street crime.

lowering rates of crime, as well as lowering fears about public safety
a lowering of crime rates and of fears about public safety
a lowering of crime rates, along with fears about public safety
crime rates being lowered, along with fears about public safety
crime rates and fears about public safety being lowered, with

B. a lowering of crime rates and of fears about public safety

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 19 Feb 2006
Posts: 44

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2006, 22:09
I am not sure about B or C

Picking C on the basis of "a lowering" should represent a single case, and hence "along with" a better use than "and".

What's the OA?

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

06 Apr 2006, 22:09
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.