It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 15:36

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Many critics claim that federally mandated car safety

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 08 May 2012
Posts: 14

Kudos [?]: 35 [3], given: 9

Location: India
Many critics claim that federally mandated car safety [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Sep 2012, 05:12
3
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

70% (01:22) correct 30% (01:16) wrong based on 361 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Many critics claim that federally mandated car safety standards are actually impairing car safety in Country X. These critics note that car manufacturers only have to meet the minimum requirements of the government in order to be viewed as safe by the consuming public. If no standards were set, manufacturers would need to compete on safety in order to have any customers at all.

Which of the following is an assumption made by the critics in the argument above?

A. Large cars, such as trucks and sport utility vehicles, are inherently safer than small cars.
B. A significant proportion of car customers own more than one car.
C. The minimum safety requirements decreed by the government of Country X are considered intolerably unsafe.
D. Other factors in a customer's car purchase decision, such as price and comfort features, are more important than safety concerns.
E. In the absence of safety standards, potential car customers will be able to tell which cars are the most safe.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 35 [3], given: 9

Manager
Status: Fighting hard
Joined: 04 Jul 2011
Posts: 69

Kudos [?]: 80 [1], given: 87

GMAT Date: 10-01-2012

### Show Tags

17 Sep 2012, 05:42
1
KUDOS
A- There is no reference to any other vehicle other than cars in the Stimulus.
B- Car Safety is the point of contention and not ownership
C- Too big a stretch to assume this. This assumption does not support the premise.
D- Negation of this assumption does not disrupt the premise.
E- Perfect as an assumption. Negation of this assumption makes the entire Stimulus baseless.

_________________

I will rather do nothing than be busy doing nothing - Zen saying

Kudos [?]: 80 [1], given: 87

Director
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 519

Kudos [?]: 335 [1], given: 269

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2012, 04:54
1
KUDOS
+1 E

I got stuck between C and E. After using negation I found E as a better answer, anyhow the word "intolerable" in the option C is too extreme.
_________________

First Attempt 710 - http://gmatclub.com/forum/first-attempt-141273.html

Kudos [?]: 335 [1], given: 269

MBA Section Director
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4472

Kudos [?]: 16958 [0], given: 1961

Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Energy and Utilities)

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2012, 04:21
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
sajini wrote:
Many critics claim that federally mandated car safety standards are actually impairing car safety in Country X. These critics note that car manufacturers only have to meet the minimum requirements of the government in order to be viewed as safe by the consuming public. If no standards were set, manufacturers would need to compete on safety in order to have any customers at all.

Which of the following is an assumption made by the critics in the argument above?

A. Large cars, such as trucks and sport utility vehicles, are inherently safer than small cars.
B. A significant proportion of car customers own more than one car.
C. The minimum safety requirements decreed by the government of Country X are considered intolerably unsafe.
D. Other factors in a customer's car purchase decision, such as price and comfort features, are more important than safety concerns.
E. In the absence of safety standards, potential car customers will be able to tell which cars are the most safe.

Conclusion of the argument: If there were NO govt set standards, car manufacturers would provide safety as a quantifiable feature to attract consumers. In other words as safety goes up consumer purchase of cars goes up.

Only E states the assumption that is, the consumer themselves MUST know how to select between 2 cars with comparable (or not) safety. If they fail to differentiate then the consumers will not buy cars with respect to the safety incorporated in them.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 16958 [0], given: 1961

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10131

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Re: Many critics claim that federally mandated car safety [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2014, 12:58
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 16 Aug 2013
Posts: 18

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 60

Re: Many critics claim that federally mandated car safety [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Sep 2015, 00:11
sajini wrote:
Many critics claim that federally mandated car safety standards are actually impairing car safety in Country X. These critics note that car manufacturers only have to meet the minimum requirements of the government in order to be viewed as safe by the consuming public. If no standards were set, manufacturers would need to compete on safety in order to have any customers at all.

Which of the following is an assumption made by the critics in the argument above?

A. Large cars, such as trucks and sport utility vehicles, are inherently safer than small cars.
B. A significant proportion of car customers own more than one car.
C. The minimum safety requirements decreed by the government of Country X are considered intolerably unsafe.
D. Other factors in a customer's car purchase decision, such as price and comfort features, are more important than safety concerns.
E. In the absence of safety standards, potential car customers will be able to tell which cars are the most safe.

Hello egmat
can you please explain why choice E is correct?

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 60

Current Student
Joined: 05 Apr 2015
Posts: 444

Kudos [?]: 238 [0], given: 39

Re: Many critics claim that federally mandated car safety [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Nov 2015, 01:45
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The argument states that "If no standards were set, manufacturers would need to compete on safety in order to have any customers at all. "

Now for that competition to happen and cars to become more safer, firstly the customers need to know how to differentiate the safety level of one car from another(without any standards set by the government)

Only option E states that. In assumption question we use the "negation test".

E:In the absence of safety standards, potential car customers will be able to tell which cars are the most safe.

Negated E:In the absence of safety standards, potential car customers will not be able to tell which cars are the most safe. We notice that if we use negated E, the conclusion will fall apart. Hence it is the assumption made.

Kudos [?]: 238 [0], given: 39

MBA Section Director
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4472

Kudos [?]: 16958 [0], given: 1961

Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Many critics claim that federally mandated car safety [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Nov 2015, 08:25
Great explanation dominicraj
_________________

Kudos [?]: 16958 [0], given: 1961

Re: Many critics claim that federally mandated car safety   [#permalink] 27 Nov 2015, 08:25
Display posts from previous: Sort by