Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 28 May 2017, 08:53

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Many high schools send students to special courses to

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Joined: 19 Jul 2012
Posts: 168
Location: India
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V28
GPA: 3.3
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 236 [0], given: 31

Many high schools send students to special courses to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Nov 2012, 06:12
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

64% (02:24) correct 36% (01:37) wrong based on 417 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Many high schools send students to special courses to prepare them for language exams. Some language teachers criticize these courses and point out that high schools which do not send their students to special courses have reported a higher average score than those which do since 1995. The language teachers say that the courses are a waste of time and money.

Which of the following, if true, is the most effective challenge to this argument?

A. Those schools which do not send students to the courses have better knowledge of the exams since they are the only schools which participated in the exams prior to 1995.
B. Schools that have sent students to courses since 1995 have experienced a greater drop in their scores than they had prior to 1995.
C. The cost of these courses run by outside teachers has risen dramatically since 1995.
D. The poor design of courses to prepare students for the language exams is not the only reason for their ineffectiveness.
E. Since 1995, the number of students who passed the language exams has risen by 20%.

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Director
Status: Done with formalities.. and back..
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 641
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Olin - Wash U - Class of 2015
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 49

Kudos [?]: 589 [0], given: 23

### Show Tags

14 Nov 2012, 08:18
Vineetk wrote:
Many high schools send students to special courses to prepare them for language exams. Some language teachers criticize these courses and point out that high schools which do not send their students to special courses have reported a higher average score than those which do since 1995. The language teachers say that the courses are a waste of time and money.

Which of the following, if true, is the most effective challenge to this argument?

A. Those schools which do not send students to the courses have better knowledge of the exams since they are the only schools which participated in the exams prior to 1995.
B. Schools that have sent students to courses since 1995 have experienced a greater drop in their scores than they had prior to 1995.
C. The cost of these courses run by outside teachers has risen dramatically since 1995.
D. The poor design of courses to prepare students for the language exams is not the only reason for their ineffectiveness.
E. Since 1995, the number of students who passed the language exams has risen by 20%.

Basically we want an answer choice that weakens the argument. Only option A is the contender. If a school has better knowledge of exam or expertise in the particular area, it doesnt need to send its students to language school and also would be able to better provide the education. Thus the results. However, other schools still need to send students for such courses

Ans A it is.
_________________

Lets Kudos!!!
Black Friday Debrief

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7380
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 2291

Kudos [?]: 15146 [2] , given: 224

### Show Tags

15 Nov 2012, 19:54
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Vineetk wrote:
Many high schools send students to special courses to prepare them for language exams. Some language teachers criticize these courses and point out that high schools which do not send their students to special courses have reported a higher average score than those which do since 1995. The language teachers say that the courses are a waste of time and money.

Which of the following, if true, is the most effective challenge to this argument?

A. Those schools which do not send students to the courses have better knowledge of the exams since they are the only schools which participated in the exams prior to 1995.
B. Schools that have sent students to courses since 1995 have experienced a greater drop in their scores than they had prior to 1995.
C. The cost of these courses run by outside teachers has risen dramatically since 1995.
D. The poor design of courses to prepare students for the language exams is not the only reason for their ineffectiveness.
E. Since 1995, the number of students who passed the language exams has risen by 20%.

Conclusion: Language courses are a waste of time and money.

Weaken the conclusion.

A - Some schools do not send students to language courses. They have better knowledge of the exam since they have been participating for a long time. Some schools send students to language courses. They do not have as much knowledge since they have not been participating for long. Hence language courses for these schools may not be a waste of time and money.

The only confusion could be with E. Notice that E talks about the 'number of students' who passed. The total number of students appearing for the test could have increased which would have increased the number of students who passed even if the passing rates remained the same. Until and unless we have some more numbers, we cannot say that E weakens the conclusion.

For more, check out this strengthen/weaken video: an-architect-s-look-at-critical-reasoning-by-veritas-prep-142434.html#p1143539
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199 Veritas Prep Reviews Manager Joined: 23 May 2013 Posts: 126 Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 110 Re: Many high schools.. [#permalink] ### Show Tags 06 Nov 2013, 06:37 VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: Vineetk wrote: Many high schools send students to special courses to prepare them for language exams. Some language teachers criticize these courses and point out that high schools which do not send their students to special courses have reported a higher average score than those which do since 1995. The language teachers say that the courses are a waste of time and money. Which of the following, if true, is the most effective challenge to this argument? A. Those schools which do not send students to the courses have better knowledge of the exams since they are the only schools which participated in the exams prior to 1995. B. Schools that have sent students to courses since 1995 have experienced a greater drop in their scores than they had prior to 1995. C. The cost of these courses run by outside teachers has risen dramatically since 1995. D. The poor design of courses to prepare students for the language exams is not the only reason for their ineffectiveness. E. Since 1995, the number of students who passed the language exams has risen by 20%. Please explain your answer. Conclusion: Language courses are a waste of time and money. Weaken the conclusion. A - Some schools do not send students to language courses. They have better knowledge of the exam since they have been participating for a long time. Some schools send students to language courses. They do not have as much knowledge since they have not been participating for long. Hence language courses for these schools may not be a waste of time and money. The only confusion could be with E. Notice that E talks about the 'number of students' who passed. The total number of students appearing for the test could have increased which would have increased the number of students who passed even if the passing rates remained the same. Until and unless we have some more numbers, we cannot say that E weakens the conclusion. For more, check out this strengthen/weaken video: an-architect-s-look-at-critical-reasoning-by-veritas-prep-142434.html#p1143539 Sorry i am still not clear as to why is E incorrect. Why do you say that it talks about number? It says that number of students increased by 20%. so if usually there were 100 students passing the exam after 1995 after attending the language course the pass % increased to 120. Its still % and not absolute numbers. _________________ “Confidence comes not from always being right but from not fearing to be wrong.” Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Posts: 7380 Location: Pune, India Followers: 2291 Kudos [?]: 15146 [1] , given: 224 Re: Many high schools.. [#permalink] ### Show Tags 06 Nov 2013, 07:10 1 This post received KUDOS Expert's post ankur1901 wrote: VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: Vineetk wrote: Many high schools send students to special courses to prepare them for language exams. Some language teachers criticize these courses and point out that high schools which do not send their students to special courses have reported a higher average score than those which do since 1995. The language teachers say that the courses are a waste of time and money. Which of the following, if true, is the most effective challenge to this argument? A. Those schools which do not send students to the courses have better knowledge of the exams since they are the only schools which participated in the exams prior to 1995. B. Schools that have sent students to courses since 1995 have experienced a greater drop in their scores than they had prior to 1995. C. The cost of these courses run by outside teachers has risen dramatically since 1995. D. The poor design of courses to prepare students for the language exams is not the only reason for their ineffectiveness. E. Since 1995, the number of students who passed the language exams has risen by 20%. Please explain your answer. Conclusion: Language courses are a waste of time and money. Weaken the conclusion. A - Some schools do not send students to language courses. They have better knowledge of the exam since they have been participating for a long time. Some schools send students to language courses. They do not have as much knowledge since they have not been participating for long. Hence language courses for these schools may not be a waste of time and money. The only confusion could be with E. Notice that E talks about the 'number of students' who passed. The total number of students appearing for the test could have increased which would have increased the number of students who passed even if the passing rates remained the same. Until and unless we have some more numbers, we cannot say that E weakens the conclusion. For more, check out this strengthen/weaken video: an-architect-s-look-at-critical-reasoning-by-veritas-prep-142434.html#p1143539 Sorry i am still not clear as to why is E incorrect. Why do you say that it talks about number? It says that number of students increased by 20%. so if usually there were 100 students passing the exam after 1995 after attending the language course the pass % increased to 120. Its still % and not absolute numbers. (E) says that "the number of students who passed the language exams has risen by 20%". The number of students who passed implies nothing about number of students who appeared since we don't know how the passing rates have changed. Say prior to 1995, 200 students used to appear for the exam and 50% i.e. 100 used to pass. Now say 240 appear and still 50% i.e. 120 pass. The 'number of students who passed' has increased from 100 to 120 (i.e. by 20%) but that doesn't imply that students are performing better now. They are performing the same as before since the pass percentage is the same (in very restricted terms). _________________ Karishma Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor My Blog Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Manager
Joined: 09 Nov 2013
Posts: 90
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 30

Re: Many high schools send students to special courses to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Dec 2013, 08:59
Hi Ankur1901

you right, Well the conclusion is whether the language course is waste of time and money or not.And option A only affects the premise" --that high schools which do not send their students to special courses have reported a higher average score than those which do since 1995--" without affecting the conclusion.

how people who support option B will prove that that the course is waste of time for another school ( in fact for all other schools as the tone of conclusion says). Moreover, the question is about language exam score ( which E clearly indicates) not overall score.Hence E suits better.

Even if , E says that the 20% rise is due to increase in number of students then in itself it infers that more people are joining this course.
thanks
Sid
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10311
Followers: 1000

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 0

Re: Many high schools send students to special courses to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Dec 2014, 20:18
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10311
Followers: 1000

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 0

Re: Many high schools send students to special courses to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Mar 2017, 12:36
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Many high schools send students to special courses to   [#permalink] 29 Mar 2017, 12:36
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Many courses in the high school syllabus are the result of outdated 3 13 Apr 2016, 23:46
3 A survey was recently given to all high school students 4 23 Mar 2016, 19:55
1 The local high school students have been clamoring for the 6 19 Aug 2013, 03:24
1 Many high schools send students to special courses to 15 09 Jan 2016, 07:17
1 Dr. Godfrey: Now that high school students are allowed to 6 11 Dec 2015, 11:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by