Many people think that the only way to remedy the problem of : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 22 Feb 2017, 20:02

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Many people think that the only way to remedy the problem of

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 21 May 2010
Posts: 21
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 1

Many people think that the only way to remedy the problem of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 May 2010, 14:33
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

25% (02:03) correct 75% (00:32) wrong based on 8 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Many people think that the only way to remedy the problem of rime is by increasing the number of police officers, but recent statistics show that many major cities had similar ratios of police officers to citizens, yet diverged widely in their crime rates.

the statistics cited function in the argument to

(A) establish that the number of police officers does not need to be increased
(B) illustrate the need for increasing the number of police officers in major cities
(C) prove that there are factors other than the number of police officers that are more important in reducing the crime rate
(D) demonstrate that there is no relation between the number of police officers and the crime rate
(E) suggest that the number of police officers is not the only influence on the crime rate

If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 16 Mar 2010
Posts: 120
Schools: Dalhousie School of Business (Corporate Residency MBA)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 8

Re: Police Officer and Crime Rates [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 May 2010, 14:48
E - here's why:
rockubabe wrote:
Many people think that the only way to remedy the problem of rime is by increasing the number of police officers, but recent statistics show that many major cities had similar ratios of police officers to citizens, yet diverged widely in their crime rates.

the statistics cited function in the argument to

First you have to understand what the question is asking you to do. It's asking what role did "recent statistics show that many major cities had similar ratios of police officers to citizens, yet diverged widely in their crime rates" have in this argument? The word "but" preceding the big sentence implies that the statistics were sort of saying "wait now hold on." When you read the statement in its entirely you should get that sense.

(A) establish that the number of police officers does not need to be increased [color=#BF0000All the stats established in the context of the argument is "that many major cities had similar ratios of police officers to citizens, yet diverged widely in their crime rates." Nothing about what to do about police officer numbers.[/color]

(B) illustrate the need for increasing the number of police officers in major cities This is just another way of saying the opposite of A. We tossed out A because it said the stats were providing advice on what to do about the police numbers. They aren't.

(C) prove that there are factors other than the number of police officers that are more important in reducing the crime rate "Prove" is a huge flag. Very strong language... 1) stats rarely "prove" anything. They are probability by definition, and "probable" isn't proof. 2) "more important": the wording of this sentence wants to lure you in because it's actually closer to the point than A or B. The stats ARE implying that police numbers aren't telling the whole story. That much should be clear. But it says nothing to the effect of HOW important the number is. It could still be the most important.

(D) demonstrate that there is no relation between the number of police officers and the crime rate This is just a silly notion and out of scope. This is a very broad claim... yet the discussion is only about major cities. "No relation" is too strong as well.

(E) suggest that the number of police officers is not the only influence on the crime rate We're left with this, and it's correct. The stats can really only suggest (strongly suggest in this case), not prove or demonstrate. By this point in our reasoning, especially considering the points we made in rejecting C, this should easily stand out. The stats say that the number of police does not have a direct relationship with the crime rates in major cities. It's not +1 cop, -1 crime since the ratios are out of whack in different cities. So there must be at least something else at play here (mobster population? climate? standard of police training?).

Forum Moderator
Status: mission completed!
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 1426
GPA: 3.77
Followers: 180

Kudos [?]: 859 [0], given: 621

Re: Police Officer and Crime Rates [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 May 2010, 14:57
rockubabe wrote:
Many people think that the only way to remedy the problem of rime is by increasing the number of police officers, but recent statistics show that many major cities had similar ratios of police officers to citizens, yet diverged widely in their crime rates.

the statistics cited function in the argument to

(A) establish that the number of police officers does not need to be increased
(B) illustrate the need for increasing the number of police officers in major cities
(C) prove that there are factors other than the number of police officers that are more important in reducing the crime rate
(D) demonstrate that there is no relation between the number of police officers and the crime rate
(E) suggest that the number of police officers is not the only influence on the crime rate

It is D.
_________________

Audaces fortuna juvat!

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Intern
Joined: 21 May 2010
Posts: 21
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 1

Re: Police Officer and Crime Rates [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 May 2010, 18:23
The OA is E. Thanks dalmba!
Re: Police Officer and Crime Rates   [#permalink] 22 May 2010, 18:23
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 Theorist: While most people think that the best 3 04 Oct 2016, 04:44
8 While many people think of genetic manipulation of food 19 07 Aug 2012, 13:49
4 If only the people using a carpool and only small cars with 12 15 Apr 2012, 05:22
The problem that environmental economics aims to remedy is 3 18 Apr 2007, 00:02
The problem that environmental economics aims to remedy is 12 16 Apr 2007, 22:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by