It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 15:51

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Many plant varieties used in industrially developed nations

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 245

Kudos [?]: 267 [0], given: 0

Many plant varieties used in industrially developed nations [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2008, 20:31
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

33% (01:31) correct 67% (01:22) wrong based on 23 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Many plant varieties used in industrially developed nations to improve cultivated crops come from lessdeveloped nations. No compensation is paid on the grounds that the plants used are "the common heritage of humanity." Such reasoning is, however,flawed. After all, no one suggests that coal, oil, and ores should be extracted without payment.

Which of the following best describes an aspect of the method used by the author in the argument above?

A The author proceeds from a number of specific observations to a tentative generalization.
B The author applies to the case under discussion facts about phenomena assumed to be similar in some relevant respect.
C A position is strengthened by showing that the opposite of that position would have logically absurd consequences.
D A line of reasoning is called into question on the grounds that it confuses cause and effect in a causal relation.
E An argument is analyzed by separating statements of fact from individual value judgments.

Kudos [?]: 267 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Posts: 201

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Re: CR aspect of argument [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2008, 20:58
ssandeepan wrote:
Many plant varieties used in industrially developed nations to improve cultivated crops come from lessdeveloped nations. No compensation is paid on the grounds that the plants used are "the common heritage of humanity." Such reasoning is, however,flawed. After all, no one suggests that coal, oil, and ores should be extracted without payment.

Which of the following best describes an aspect of the method used by the author in the argument above?

A The author proceeds from a number of specific observations to a tentative generalization.
B The author applies to the case under discussion facts about phenomena assumed to be similar in some relevant respect.
C A position is strengthened by showing that the opposite of that position would have logically absurd consequences.
D A line of reasoning is called into question on the grounds that it confuses cause and effect in a causal relation.
E An argument is analyzed by separating statements of fact from individual value judgments.

ANS should be C. "Such reasoning is, however, flawed"...

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1402

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 1

Re: CR aspect of argument [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2008, 21:27
Richardson wrote:
ssandeepan wrote:
Many plant varieties used in industrially developed nations to improve cultivated crops come from lessdeveloped nations. No compensation is paid on the grounds that the plants used are "the common heritage of humanity." Such reasoning is, however,flawed. After all, no one suggests that coal, oil, and ores should be extracted without payment.

Which of the following best describes an aspect of the method used by the author in the argument above?

A The author proceeds from a number of specific observations to a tentative generalization.
B The author applies to the case under discussion facts about phenomena assumed to be similar in some relevant respect.
C A position is strengthened by showing that the opposite of that position would have logically absurd consequences.
D A line of reasoning is called into question on the grounds that it confuses cause and effect in a causal relation.
E An argument is analyzed by separating statements of fact from individual value judgments.

ANS should be C. "Such reasoning is, however, flawed"...

IMO B, I was between B & C. I don't see any logically absurd consequences as mentioned in C.

In B, the author applies the facts of mineral extraction to the plant development.

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Jul 2008
Posts: 289

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 4

Schools: INSEAD Dec'10
Re: CR aspect of argument [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2008, 01:11
Close call between B and C. I choose C.

My reasoning: B is not completely wrong, but C is better because it describes more precisely what the authoer does.

Edit: C talks about the author's "position" and B talks about "case under discussion". The second may imply that the author is objectively comparing different positions on an issue, for example. C is better, because it shows that the author has a specific position, which he seeks to strengthen by invoking the comparison.
_________________

http://applicant.wordpress.com/

Last edited by Nerdboy on 04 Sep 2008, 02:12, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 4

SVP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1535

Kudos [?]: 279 [0], given: 0

Re: CR aspect of argument [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2008, 02:07
Another C.

Kudos [?]: 279 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1402

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 1

Re: CR aspect of argument [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2008, 07:24
@ all folks who prefer C to B,

Can you please tell me what are those logically absurd consequences the author is pointing to us? I don't see any consequences. I see only comparison because author thinks that both needs to have same/similar process.

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Jul 2008
Posts: 289

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 4

Schools: INSEAD Dec'10
Re: CR aspect of argument [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2008, 07:58
icandy wrote:
@ all folks who prefer C to B,

Can you please tell me what are those logically absurd consequences the author is pointing to us? I don't see any consequences. I see only comparison because author thinks that both needs to have same/similar process.

Absurd consequences = extracting oil, gas and ores without payment.
_________________

http://applicant.wordpress.com/

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 4

Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Jul 2008
Posts: 289

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 4

Schools: INSEAD Dec'10
Re: CR aspect of argument [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2008, 08:00
Note that you don't actually have to agree with the author, just understand his/her line of reasoning. Even if the reasoning is flawed/wrong in some way.
_________________

http://applicant.wordpress.com/

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 4

VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1402

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 1

Re: CR aspect of argument [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2008, 08:52
OP what is the OA?

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Posts: 429

Kudos [?]: 164 [0], given: 1

Re: CR aspect of argument [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2008, 09:35
ssandeepan wrote:
Many plant varieties used in industrially developed nations to improve cultivated crops come from lessdeveloped nations. No compensation is paid on the grounds that the plants used are "the common heritage of humanity." Such reasoning is, however,flawed. After all, no one suggests that coal, oil, and ores should be extracted without payment.

Which of the following best describes an aspect of the method used by the author in the argument above?

A The author proceeds from a number of specific observations to a tentative generalization.
B The author applies to the case under discussion facts about phenomena assumed to be similar in some relevant respect.
C A position is strengthened by showing that the opposite of that position would have logically absurd consequences.
D A line of reasoning is called into question on the grounds that it confuses cause and effect in a causal relation.
E An argument is analyzed by separating statements of fact from individual value judgments.

IMO B)

I dont think there is anything opposite being discussed as suggested in C)

Kudos [?]: 164 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2008
Posts: 101

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

Re: CR aspect of argument [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2008, 11:49
I am riding on the C train as well.

IMO its the only answer that makes sense to me

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Posts: 291

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 0

Re: CR aspect of argument [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2008, 12:01
B for me :

A The author proceeds from a number of specific observations to a tentative generalization.
B The author applies to the case under discussion facts about phenomena assumed to be similar in some relevant respect.
C A position is strengthened by showing that the opposite of that position would have logically absurd consequences.
D A line of reasoning is called into question on the grounds that it confuses cause and effect in a causal relation.
E An argument is analyzed by separating statements of fact from individual value judgments.

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Posts: 781

Kudos [?]: 181 [0], given: 0

Re: CR aspect of argument [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2008, 13:39
Another B

Kudos [?]: 181 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Posts: 128

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 5

Location: United States
Re: CR aspect of argument [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Nov 2011, 06:58
Nerdboy wrote:
icandy wrote:
@ all folks who prefer C to B,

Can you please tell me what are those logically absurd consequences the author is pointing to us? I don't see any consequences. I see only comparison because author thinks that both needs to have same/similar process.

Absurd consequences = extracting oil, gas and ores without payment.

I find it to be B.
Clearly, one cannot deny that here is no comparison.
But, in case of C, there is no real 'consequence' that can be absurd. The author feels the reasoning would be absurd. No consequences have been mentioned like , no compensation paid => farmers suicide etc...
Also, C is quite general, meaning, it says, a position is strengthened by showing the other is absurd.
Actually, the position is strengthened by comparison method, which is the actual cause to prove that the counter argument is logically flawed/absurd. Hence, C is got from multiple steps, while B is instantly conclusive.

Thanks!

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 5

Manager
Status: SC SC SC SC SC.... Concentrating on SC alone.
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 235

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 47

Location: India
Concentration: General Management
GMAT Date: 12-30-2011
Re: Many plant varieties used in industrially developed nations [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Nov 2011, 09:02
+1 for B
_________________

D- Day December 30 2011. Hoping for the happiest new year celebrations !

Aiming for 700+

Kudo me if the post is worth it

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 47

Senior Manager
Status: D-Day is on February 10th. and I am not stressed
Affiliations: American Management association, American Association of financial accountants
Joined: 12 Apr 2011
Posts: 256

Kudos [?]: 359 [0], given: 52

Location: Kuwait
Schools: Columbia university
Re: Many plant varieties used in industrially developed nations [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Nov 2011, 14:17
I go with C
_________________

Sky is the limit

Kudos [?]: 359 [0], given: 52

BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 889

Kudos [?]: 718 [0], given: 44

Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Re: Many plant varieties used in industrially developed nations [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Nov 2011, 00:16
I chose C
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Kudos [?]: 718 [0], given: 44

Manager
Joined: 08 Jul 2008
Posts: 140

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 1

Re: Many plant varieties used in industrially developed nations [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Nov 2011, 20:26
+1 B

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 189

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 349

Concentration: General Management, Operations
Schools: HBS '19 (S)
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
Re: Many plant varieties used in industrially developed nations [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jan 2013, 06:21
I go with C ... it gives a clearer meaning ...

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 349

Re: Many plant varieties used in industrially developed nations   [#permalink] 23 Jan 2013, 06:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Many plant varieties used in industrially developed nations

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.