Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 25 May 2017, 22:19

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Margaret: According to a report provided by the National Emp

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 276
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Other
GPA: 2.44
WE: Project Management (Telecommunications)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 904 [1] , given: 325

Margaret: According to a report provided by the National Emp [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2013, 06:39
1
This post received
KUDOS
7
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

41% (02:19) correct 59% (01:23) wrong based on 268 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Margaret: According to a report provided by the National Employment Department of Litia, former police officers of the Litian police force are more likely to work as security officers than other Litians.

Sam: Obviously, you haven’t considered the fact that 80 percent of all security officers working in Litia have never served in the Litian police force.

Which of the following is the most accurate evaluation of Sam’s reply?
(A)It shows that being able to become a security officer does not always result in becoming one.
(B)It provides additional evidence in support of Margaret’s claim.
(C)It is compatible with Margaret’s claim.
(D)It provides statistical information that proves Margaret’s claim incorrect.
(E)It shows the distinction between what is necessary to become a security officer and what is sufficient to become one.

OA to follow .
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by guerrero25 on 14 Jul 2013, 20:19, edited 1 time in total.
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Director
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 832
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
Followers: 64

Kudos [?]: 1400 [2] , given: 197

Re: Margaret: According to a report provided by the National Emp [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2013, 07:21
2
This post received
KUDOS
guerrero25 wrote:
Margaret: According to a report provided by the National Employment Department of Litia, former police officers of the Litian police force are more likely to work as security officers than other Litians.

Sam: Obviously, you haven’t considered the fact that 80 percent of all security officers working in Litia have never served in the Litian police force.

Which of the following is the most accurate evaluation of Sam’s reply?
(A)It shows that being able to become a security officer does not always result in becoming one.
(B)It provides additional evidence in support of Margaret’s claim.
(C)It is compatible with Margaret’s claim.
(D)It provides statistical information that proves Margaret’s claim incorrect.
(E)It shows the distinction between what is necessary to become a security officer and what is sufficient to become one.

OA to follow .

IMO C

Margaret: former police officers of the Litian police force are more likely to work as SECURITY OFFICERS than other Litians.===>NOTE:THIS SECURITY OFFICER CAN BE SECURITY OFFICER OF ANY OTHER COUNTRY ALSO ,,,,,IT IS NOT TOLD THAT HE/SHE WILL BECOME SECURITY OFFICER ONLY IN LITIA.

Sam: Obviously, you haven’t considered the fact that 80 percent of all security officers working in Litia have never served in the Litian police force.===>HE IS TALKING ABOUT LITIAN SECURITY OFFICERS ONLY.

(A)It shows that being able to become a security officer does not always result in becoming one.==>
Passage is NOT talking about ability rather about LIKELIHOOD.===>Wrong

(B)It provides additional evidence in support of Margaret’s claim.==>this doesnt supports margaret claim.

(C)It is compatible with Margaret’s claim.===>this is possible.....it is possible because polic officer can become security officer in other country also...hence it is compatiable==>correct

(D)It provides statistical information that proves Margaret’s claim incorrect.===>incorrect we cant conclude so.

(E)It shows the distinction between what is necessary to become a security officer and what is sufficient to become one.==>doesnt shows any distinction. wrong

hence C

WAITING OA
_________________

When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

GIVE VALUE TO OFFICIAL QUESTIONS...

GMAT RCs VOCABULARY LIST: http://gmatclub.com/forum/vocabulary-list-for-gmat-reading-comprehension-155228.html
learn AWA writing techniques while watching video : http://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-analytical-writing-assessment
: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APt9ITygGss

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Posts: 629
Followers: 83

Kudos [?]: 1192 [2] , given: 136

Re: Margaret: According to a report provided by the National Emp [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2013, 10:58
2
This post received
KUDOS
guerrero25 wrote:
Margaret: According to a report provided by the National Employment Department of Litia, former police officers of the Litian police force are more likely to work as security officers than other Litians.

Sam: Obviously, you haven’t considered the fact that 80 percent of all security officers working in Litia have never served in the Litian police force.

Which of the following is the most accurate evaluation of Sam’s reply?
(A)It shows that being able to become a security officer does not always result in becoming one.
(B)It provides additional evidence in support of Margaret’s claim.
(C)It is compatible with Margaret’s claim.
(D)It provides statistical information that proves Margaret’s claim incorrect.
(E)It shows the distinction between what is necessary to become a security officer and what is sufficient to become one.

Gist of what Margaret says : A former police officer in Litia will have a more quantified desire/inclination to become a security officer, than someone(Litian) who is from a non-police background.

Gist of what Sam says : The current strength of all the security officers in Litia has 80% of people who have not been in the Litian Police force,however the remaining 20% have served in the Litian police force at some point of time in the past.

The bone of contention between both :

Likely to do something doesn' always result in DOING that. To paraphrase what Margaret said, if given an option among say Job A, Job B and Job C(Security Officer), a retired police officer(Litian) is more likely to choose Job C.However,it is by no means,binding on him/her.Also, they both might be talking about 2 different sets of people.

(A)It shows that being able to become a security officer does not always result in becoming one.

It is no-where mentioned that the retired police officers were not able to qualify as security officers.

(B)It provides additional evidence in support of Margaret’s claim.
Evidence in support of Margaret's claim would have been if Sam would have stated something like this : Out of the given strength of retired police officers(Litian), 90% are currently security officers.

(C)It is compatible with Margaret’s claim.
Correct.Maybe there are 100 security officers in Litia. 80 are from a non-police background and among these 80 people, maybe some are not even from Litia itself.However,20 were in the Litian police force.
Say the retired police officers in Litia are 30 in number. Thus, out of 30, 20 are security officers now.So,what Sam states is compatible with Margaret's said.

(D)It provides statistical information that proves Margaret’s claim incorrect.
This option would be correct,had Sam said something like this :
Out of the given strength of retired police officers(Litian), 90 % have expressed an interest in not becoming a security officer.

(E)It shows the distinction between what is necessary to become a security officer and what is sufficient to become one.
No such thing is evident.

IMO C.
_________________
Manager
Joined: 23 May 2013
Posts: 126
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 110

Re: Margaret: According to a report provided by the National Emp [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Oct 2013, 19:46
guerrero25 wrote:
Margaret: According to a report provided by the National Employment Department of Litia, former police officers of the Litian police force are more likely to work as security officers than other Litians.

Sam: Obviously, you haven’t considered the fact that 80 percent of all security officers working in Litia have never served in the Litian police force.

Which of the following is the most accurate evaluation of Sam’s reply?
(A)It shows that being able to become a security officer does not always result in becoming one.
(B)It provides additional evidence in support of Margaret’s claim.
(C)It is compatible with Margaret’s claim.
(D)It provides statistical information that proves Margaret’s claim incorrect.
(E)It shows the distinction between what is necessary to become a security officer and what is sufficient to become one.

OA to follow .

According to Sam, most of the security officers does not come from police force. It can be true. eg there are 1000 police officers and 800 of them become security officers. The total number of security officers could be 10000. Hence number of security officers coming from police force could be minuscule % of total police officers.
_________________

“Confidence comes not from always being right but from not fearing to be wrong.”

Manager
Joined: 29 May 2013
Posts: 90
Concentration: General Management, International Business
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 4
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 51

Re: Margaret: According to a report provided by the National Emp [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2014, 14:51
guerrero25 wrote:
Margaret: According to a report provided by the National Employment Department of Litia, former police officers of the Litian police force are more likely to work as security officers than other Litians.

Sam: Obviously, you haven’t considered the fact that 80 percent of all security officers working in Litia have never served in the Litian police force.

Which of the following is the most accurate evaluation of Sam’s reply?
(A)It shows that being able to become a security officer does not always result in becoming one.
(B)It provides additional evidence in support of Margaret’s claim.
(C)It is compatible with Margaret’s claim.
(D)It provides statistical information that proves Margaret’s claim incorrect.
(E)It shows the distinction between what is necessary to become a security officer and what is sufficient to become one.

OA to follow .

Nice one. Admittedly C and D are close contenders. But D is incorrect because Margaret's claim is not proven incorrect (at least we ca not conclude so). Hence C is correct.
Re: Margaret: According to a report provided by the National Emp   [#permalink] 10 Aug 2014, 14:51
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Ronald: According to my analysis of the national economy, 1 03 Jul 2016, 05:26
4 According to a recent report, the original tires supplied with the Im 2 20 Feb 2016, 13:10
7 According to reports provided by large Canadian corporations 4 25 Feb 2015, 21:10
9 According to reports provided by the San Tijon Police 7 19 Apr 2015, 04:22
2 Ronald: According to my analysis of the national economy, 11 12 Jul 2015, 04:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Margaret: According to a report provided by the National Emp

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.