bauble wrote:
In good programs, research is given higher priority by wide margin. It's how the departments measure themselves against each other, and research productivity also (this is only me talking here) seems to have an important bearing on the quality of the school's interaction with industry, e.g. for consulting.
So in your case, if you want to study at a program anything like those you mentioned, research as first priority is a given in grad school. It will also be a given in most tenure track positions (I think). It's great to be passionate about teaching, but you have to be passionate about research as well.
After tenure, I've heard it both ways. Everyone I've spoken to says that technically, you can semi-retire from research at that point, but there are differing opinions on its practicality. At best, I've heard that it can be sort of uncomfortably done, while others say that the social consequences (e.g. being ostracized within the dept) make it highly undesirable. My sense is that there may be perceptual biases due to personality differences, and I don't have a sense of this first hand.
Excellent points.
I have seen tenured professors focus on MBA and Exec MBAs. You can make boatloads of money teaching Exec MBAs. At one school, you get paid about $4000-$5000 A DAY for a 2 week Exec MBA session. You will be drained by the end of it, but its good money.
I have also seen tenured professors become very focused on doctoral students. Thats the legacy they want to leave behind. It keeps them young and aid the growth of the profession with a high quality of doctoral students.