Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack
GMAT Club

 It is currently 23 Mar 2017, 11:45

# R2 Decisions:

Berkeley Haas; Decision Tracker (Join Chat Room 5)  |  Yale SOM; Decision Tracker (Join Chat Room 4

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Maximum allowable production levels of pollution for

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 551
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 449 [0], given: 2

Maximum allowable production levels of pollution for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2009, 10:30
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Maximum allowable production levels of pollution for industrial concerns are usually determined in legislation that is based in large part on the recommendations of scientists at the Environmental Protection Agency. Industrial concerns must pay a fine that is proportional to the level of pollution that exceeds the limit, and this proportion should be revised every year based on the number of firms that exceeded the limit the year before to maximize the penalties assessed to polluters. However, the revision process usually occurs less frequently than once a year because lobbyists for industrial concerns usually persuade the government to hold off so as to avoid having to pay increased fines for pollution.

If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a revision should occur?

(A) A dozen fewer firms were over the limit, but their total pollution over the limit increased over the last year.
(B) Two more firms exceeded the limit than the year before, but the net level of pollution over the limit decreased.
(C) No more firms went over the limit than the year before, but the amount of total pollution over the year before went up.
(D) No firms were over the limit, and total pollution decreased by about forty percent from the year before.
(E) Several fewer firms were over the limit than the year before, and the total pollution over the limit decreased accordingly.
If you have any questions
New!
VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1429
Followers: 39

Kudos [?]: 370 [0], given: 1

Re: CR: production levels of pollution [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2009, 10:37
Maximum allowable production levels of pollution for industrial concerns are usually determined in legislation that is based in large part on the recommendations of scientists at the Environmental Protection Agency. Industrial concerns must pay a fine that is proportional to the level of pollution that exceeds the limit, and this proportion should be revised every year based on the number of firms that exceeded the limit the year before to maximize the penalties assessed to polluters. However, the revision process usually occurs less frequently than once a year because lobbyists for industrial concerns usually persuade the government to hold off so as to avoid having to pay increased fines for pollution.

If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a revision should occur?

(A) A dozen fewer firms were over the limit, but their total pollution over the limit increased over the last year.
(B) Two more firms exceeded the limit than the year before, but the net level of pollution over the limit decreased.
(C) No more firms went over the limit than the year before, but the amount of total pollution over the year before went up.
(D) No firms were over the limit, and total pollution decreased by about forty percent from the year before.
(E) Several fewer firms were over the limit than the year before, and the total pollution over the limit decreased accordingly.

It is entirely based on the number of firms that exceeded the limit.

Only B shows that the number of firms which went over the limit increased and hence a revision will cause the fine to go up.

Others have no change or have number of firms over the limit going down. So revision will cause fines to come down.
Manager
Joined: 30 May 2009
Posts: 81
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 2

Re: CR: production levels of pollution [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jun 2009, 12:12
IMO C.

OA.?
Intern
Joined: 18 May 2009
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 1

Re: CR: production levels of pollution [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2009, 02:30
Maximum allowable production levels of pollution for industrial concerns are usually determined in legislation that is based in large part on the recommendations of scientists at the Environmental Protection Agency. Industrial concerns must pay a fine that is proportional to the level of pollution that exceeds the limit, and this proportion should be revised every year based on the number of firms that exceeded the limit the year before to maximize the penalties assessed to polluters. However, the revision process usually occurs less frequently than once a year because lobbyists for industrial concerns usually persuade the government to hold off so as to avoid having to pay increased fines for pollution.

If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a revision should occur?

(A) A dozen fewer firms were over the limit, but their total pollution over the limit increased over the last year.
(B) Two more firms exceeded the limit than the year before, but the net level of pollution over the limit decreased.
(C) No more firms went over the limit than the year before, but the amount of total pollution over the year before went up.
(D) No firms were over the limit, and total pollution decreased by about forty percent from the year before.
(E) Several fewer firms were over the limit than the year before, and the total pollution over the limit decreased accordingly.

IMO A is the best choice, no of firms got reduced and still pollution levels went up. In this case definitely revision of policies should happen and these firms should pay more heavy fines. B can't be the answer because argument says the revision is based on the number of firms that exceeded the 'pollution; limit. The argument doesn't suggest that number of firms should increase in order for revision to happen. Moreover, according to B, net pollution level decreased and hence no need for revision.
Manager
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 57
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 1

Re: CR: production levels of pollution [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2009, 07:48

B) The situation doesn't mention about how many firms and limit decrease
D) also percentage
E) Also too

_________________

Remember to give kudos if it's useful for you !!!

Re: CR: production levels of pollution   [#permalink] 05 Jun 2009, 07:48
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 From last few years since 1972, pollution levels in Lake X 4 24 Dec 2015, 03:33
9 CR: air pollutants 27 26 Jun 2008, 02:56
1 Nitrogen dioxide is a pollutant emitted by automobiles. 9 16 Jan 2008, 15:30
Nitrogen dioxide is a pollutant emitted by automobiles. 4 08 Jan 2008, 08:46
Nitrogen dioxide is a pollutant emitted by automobiles. 4 14 Jun 2007, 15:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by