Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 28 May 2017, 05:07

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jul 2007
Posts: 40
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Oct 2007, 12:44
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

67% (02:27) correct 33% (01:16) wrong based on 34 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Political Advertisement: Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership. Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office. So there can be no question that throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the advertisement?

A. The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure.

B. Average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.

C. Some of the jobs created in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure have in the meantime been eliminated again.

D. The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide.

E. The average pay for jobs in the city is currently higher than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Request Expert Reply
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 157
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Re: Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Oct 2007, 13:05
"A"
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Sep 2007
Posts: 116
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Re: Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Oct 2007, 13:48
gmatmilitary wrote:
Political Advertisement:
Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership. Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay
for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office. So there can be no question that throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the advertisement?
A. The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure.
B. Average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.
C. Some of the jobs created in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure have in the meantime been eliminated again.
D. The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide.
E. The average pay for jobs in the city is currently higher than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city.


A, only answer that actually talks about increase in salaries.
2 KUDOS received
GMAT Instructor
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Posts: 1263
Location: Madrid
Followers: 29

Kudos [?]: 307 [2] , given: 0

Re: Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Oct 2007, 14:17
2
This post received
KUDOS
D What if the jobs eliminated paid very high salaries? D eliminates this possibility.
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Posts: 317
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 40 [1] , given: 0

Re: Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Oct 2007, 14:19
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The answer is D.

gmatmilitary wrote:
Political Advertisement:
Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership. Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office. So there can be no question that throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the advertisement?
A. The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure.

We have to show that "throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger". During the first three years of his tenure Delmont could have paid people peanuts. Which means there is no that even now Delmont could be paying LESS than people earned before he took office.

B. Average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.

This doesnt prove anything. The question is did Delmont raise pay AFTER he took office.

C. Some of the jobs created in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure have in the meantime been eliminated again.
So Delmont created some jobs and then eliminated these higher paying jobs. Result: average might have remained same.

D. The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide.
If Delmont eliminates jobs with pay "roughly equal to the average pay for jobs citywide" that means he is eliminating lower pay jobs. This means his higher paying newer jobs are pushing the city average up.

E. The average pay for jobs in the city is currently higher than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city.
Irrelevant suburbs and city pay has nothing to do with each other.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Aug 2007
Posts: 363
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

Re: Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Oct 2007, 15:22
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
gluon wrote:
The answer is D.

gmatmilitary wrote:
Political Advertisement:
Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership. Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office. So there can be no question that throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the advertisement?
A. The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure.

We have to show that "throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger". During the first three years of his tenure Delmont could have paid people peanuts. Which means there is no that even now Delmont could be paying LESS than people earned before he took office.

B. Average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.

This doesnt prove anything. The question is did Delmont raise pay AFTER he took office.

C. Some of the jobs created in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure have in the meantime been eliminated again.
So Delmont created some jobs and then eliminated these higher paying jobs. Result: average might have remained same.

D. The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide.
If Delmont eliminates jobs with pay "roughly equal to the average pay for jobs citywide" that means he is eliminating lower pay jobs. This means his higher paying newer jobs are pushing the city average up.

E. The average pay for jobs in the city is currently higher than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city.
Irrelevant suburbs and city pay has nothing to do with each other.


Gluon great explanation!!!
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jul 2007
Posts: 40
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Oct 2007, 03:11
Great explaination. I also agree that it is D. However, the offical answer was A. This question was taken from an 800 score Set. I was sure that they made an error here.

Thanks all for your help!
1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Posts: 547
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 393 [1] , given: 2

Re: Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 May 2008, 11:40
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Political Advertisement:
Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership. Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office. So there can be no question that throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the advertisement?
A. The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure.
B. Average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.
C. Some of the jobs created in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure have in the meantime been eliminated again.
D. The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide.
E. The average pay for jobs in the city is currently higher than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Apr 2008
Posts: 318
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 84 [0], given: 0

Re: Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 May 2008, 17:07
B. Average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Aug 2005
Posts: 61
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Re: Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 May 2008, 19:30
A.

actually, i changed my mind after re-reading carefully. D!

Last edited by seongbae on 15 May 2008, 07:20, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jun 2007
Posts: 199
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 0

Re: Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 May 2008, 19:34
saravalli wrote:
Political Advertisement:
Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership. Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office. So there can be no question that throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the advertisement?
A. The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure.
B. Average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.
C. Some of the jobs created in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure have in the meantime been eliminated again.
D. The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide.
E. The average pay for jobs in the city is currently higher than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city.


I choose B. In A, why focus on 3 years, C doesn't support the argument and D and E do not apply.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2007
Posts: 150
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Re: Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 May 2008, 19:39
Very good question. +1 to saravalli.

I went for A but I can see why B is better.

A just compares averages over 2 periods of time in the mayor's tenure. This average does not mean that there has been a year on year increase in the average paycheck. For instance, out of 3 years -its possible that they pay decreased in one year and then increased in the other two.

But from B it can be inferred that the average paycheck over a rolling period of 10 years will increase even if the total paycheck value remains the same for many years.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 31 Oct 2007
Posts: 115
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Re: Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 May 2008, 19:45
Quote:
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the advertisement?
A. The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure.
B. Average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.
C. Some of the jobs created in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure have in the meantime been eliminated again.
D. The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide.
E. The average pay for jobs in the city is currently higher than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city.


A - CORRECT. It supports the conclusion. The average pay is getting steadily bigger throughout Delmont’s tenure.
B - Eliminate. It says ten year low. How much now ? No clue.
C- Eliminate - Some (Never in Strengthening question)
D - Eliminate - Does not Strengthen
E - Eliminate - Wrong comparison . Time must be involved during comparison.
_________________

Many people dream, but some wake up and work towards it.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2008
Posts: 49
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 May 2008, 20:32
I think its D.

Lets say that the few jobs being lost were the ones with very high pay, way above city-wide average. So, now even if the new jobs have pay greater than city-wide average, the overall pay average of the city will come down.

D states the assumption made in the argument that the jobs lost were with average salary.
OA?
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Posts: 56
Schools: IESE
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Re: Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2008, 03:28
B for me
1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1897
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 1122 [1] , given: 1

Premium Member
Re: Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2008, 05:36
1
This post received
KUDOS
itsme291 wrote:
I think its D.

Lets say that the few jobs being lost were the ones with very high pay, way above city-wide average. So, now even if the new jobs have pay greater than city-wide average, the overall pay average of the city will come down.

D states the assumption made in the argument that the jobs lost were with average salary.
OA?


D for me too, only one in the same boat as mine :lol:
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 321
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 0

Re: Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2008, 06:24
One more for D. Will provide explanation if it is correct.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Posts: 791
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 123 [0], given: 25

Re: Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2008, 07:30
D.

It boils down to between B and D for me.

B. Average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.
The argument is he created higher paying jobs, thus did a good job. This answer is ambiguous since average pay increase later can be attributed to other reasons.

D. The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide.
This one best explains why the average pay has been increased.

I think. :)
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 130
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

Re: Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2008, 08:56
(+)
D's critics complain -> job loss under D.
Fact. more jobs created than eliminated & avg. pay higher for new jobs every year since
(conclusion) So : During D's time avg. pay check is getting bigger.

saravalli wrote:
Political Advertisement:
Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership. Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office. So there can be no question that throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the advertisement?
A. The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure.
>> Irrelevant, we want to support what happend during D's tenure not after.

B. Average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.
>> This supports the argument. He picked up at a low and it has been growing steadily.


C. Some of the jobs created in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure have in the meantime been eliminated again.
>> Doesnt help our conclusion.
D. The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide.
>> We are not interested in the avg. pay of eliminated jobs.

E. The average pay for jobs in the city is currently higher than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city.
>> Irrelevant to the argument.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Posts: 536
Schools: Stern, McCombs, Marshall, Wharton
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 161 [0], given: 0

Re: Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2008, 09:40
I say D.

We know that the jobs being created are higher than the average jobs. But we dont know what jobs are being lost.

ex. The average pay is $1000. The Mayor could be adding a lot of jobs that pay $1500 and losing a few jobs that pay $3000.

In order to know for sure if your increasing the average you need to know the value of the jobs being lost.
Re: Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the   [#permalink] 15 May 2008, 09:40

Go to page    1   2   3   4    Next  [ 69 posts ] 

    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Political Advertisement: Mayor Delmont s critics complain fanatico 0 03 Feb 2017, 12:23
Mayor Delmont's critics complain about the jobs that were neeshpal 0 31 Dec 2016, 08:43
4 Mayor Delmont's critics complain about the jobs that were vivektripathi 7 14 Oct 2016, 02:50
Mayor Delmont s critics complain about the jobs that were Nihit 0 23 Nov 2016, 09:07
Political Advertisement: Mayor Delmont s critics complain mymba99 0 03 Feb 2017, 12:12
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.