It is currently 21 Sep 2017, 16:36

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut

Author Message
Director
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 794

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore
Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Oct 2005, 17:09
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut school funding and each time school officials complained that the cuts would force them to reduce expenditures for essential services. But each time, only expenditures for nonessential services were actually reduced. So school officials can implement further cuts without reducing any expenditures for essential services.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the mayorâ€™s conclusion?

(A) The cityâ€™s schools have always provided essential services as efficiently as they have provided nonessential services.
(B) Sufficient funds are currently available to allow the cityâ€™s schools to provide some nonessential services.
(C) Price estimates quoted to the cityâ€™s schools for the provision of nonessential services have not increased substantially since the most recent school funding cut.
(D) Few influential city administrators support the funding of costly nonessential services in the cityâ€™s schools.
(E) The cityâ€™s school officials rarely exaggerate the potential impact of threatened funding cuts.
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Posts: 246

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Oct 2005, 17:51
I go for B

obviously, the city can continue to cut funds for nonessential services, only if there is anything left to cut. If there schools only had funds for essential services, then budget cuts would directly affect essential services and the conclusion would fall apart.

A) efficiency about the services is not the main point
C) Also not main point and additionally has no connection to essential services
D) May be true, however does not strengthen the conclusion
E) The "potential" impact of threatened funding cuts is never bein talked about. The stem is concerned with real funding cuts. threatening cuts have never been mentioned.

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5039

Kudos [?]: 424 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

05 Oct 2005, 18:53
(A) - out of scope
(B) - best choice
(C) - out of scope
(D) - irrelevant
(E) - does not support conclusion

I'll take B. If there are actually funds still available for essential services, then the mayor's conclusion is supported for.

Kudos [?]: 424 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 21 Aug 2005
Posts: 786

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Oct 2005, 22:00
B is the best choice.
The main question based on the conclusion is, after so many successive cuts in expenditures for nonessential services, is there still room for more cuts in this area? This is best answered by choice B.

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Posts: 232

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2005, 01:14
go B go...

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 454

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 0

Location: New York

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2005, 08:14
Going with B

B says that there is still room to cut the budget because there are funds to conver nonessential. Since we are only concerned with having essential activities...we can still cut.

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 482

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

Location: Chicago

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2005, 08:42
B imo too
_________________

Fear Mediocrity, Respect Ignorance

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 166

Kudos [?]: 257 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2005, 11:34
B for me too

Kudos [?]: 257 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1704

Kudos [?]: 457 [0], given: 0

Location: Dhaka

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2005, 12:54
B as well.
_________________

hey ya......

Kudos [?]: 457 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5210

Kudos [?]: 432 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2005, 22:11
This is an immediate B. Schools still have excess non-essential funds available, so there is ample justification for the mayor`s conclusion.

Kudos [?]: 432 [0], given: 0

06 Oct 2005, 22:11
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Over the past ten years, the population of Dismaston has grown five ti 0 15 Aug 2015, 21:04
Over the past ten years, the population of Dismiston has grown five ti 0 05 Nov 2016, 18:41
Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut 0 30 Jun 2017, 03:47
Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut 0 28 Apr 2016, 10:39
Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut 7 25 Jun 2008, 16:55
Display posts from previous: Sort by