Mayor of Outerville, a suburb of Center City: Outerville : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 26 Feb 2017, 02:14

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Mayor of Outerville, a suburb of Center City: Outerville

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 647
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 296 [0], given: 0

Mayor of Outerville, a suburb of Center City: Outerville [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Nov 2007, 18:57
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (02:32) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Mayor of Outerville, a suburb of Center City: Outerville must grow if it is to survive, so, as we have agreed, efforts should be made to attract more residents. The best strategy for attracting residents is to renovate the train station. The numbers of jobs in Center City and of people who prefer to live in suburban towns are increasing. With the rise in tolls, driving into the city is becoming more expensive than train travel. Therefore, people want to live in towns where train travel is convenient and pleasant.

The argument leads to the conclusion that
(A) the town of Outerville should attract more residents
(B) the train station in Outerville should be renovated
(C) residents of Outerville who are in need of work should look for jobs in Center City
(D) people who work in Center City but live in Outerville should commute by train rather than driving
(E) people who want to live where train travel is convenient and pleasant should live in Outerville

If you have any questions
New!
CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2583
Followers: 20

Kudos [?]: 429 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Conclusion of argument [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Nov 2007, 19:14
eyunni wrote:
Mayor of Outerville, a suburb of Center City: Outerville must grow if it is to survive, so, as we have agreed, efforts should be made to attract more residents. The best strategy for attracting residents is to renovate the train station. The numbers of jobs in Center City and of people who prefer to live in suburban towns are increasing. With the rise in tolls, driving into the city is becoming more expensive than train travel. Therefore, people want to live in towns where train travel is convenient and pleasant.

The argument leads to the conclusion that
(A) the town of Outerville should attract more residents
(B) the train station in Outerville should be renovated
(C) residents of Outerville who are in need of work should look for jobs in Center City
(D) people who work in Center City but live in Outerville should commute by train rather than driving
(E) people who want to live where train travel is convenient and pleasant should live in Outerville

I say B. The argument calls for attracting more residents and the method to do this is by renovating the train station.
SVP
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1575
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 150 [0], given: 2

Show Tags

18 Nov 2007, 19:19
what a weird question .... isnt B just restating what is already said in the question ?
Director
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 647
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 296 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Conclusion of argument [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Nov 2007, 19:56
GMATBLACKBELT wrote:
eyunni wrote:
Mayor of Outerville, a suburb of Center City: Outerville must grow if it is to survive, so, as we have agreed, efforts should be made to attract more residents. The best strategy for attracting residents is to renovate the train station. The numbers of jobs in Center City and of people who prefer to live in suburban towns are increasing. With the rise in tolls, driving into the city is becoming more expensive than train travel. Therefore, people want to live in towns where train travel is convenient and pleasant.

The argument leads to the conclusion that
(A) the town of Outerville should attract more residents
(B) the train station in Outerville should be renovated
(C) residents of Outerville who are in need of work should look for jobs in Center City
(D) people who work in Center City but live in Outerville should commute by train rather than driving
(E) people who want to live where train travel is convenient and pleasant should live in Outerville

I say B. The argument calls for attracting more residents and the method to do this is by renovating the train station.

I made a mistake while solving this CR and chose (B). On some analysis using the Powerscore CR bible for finding conclusion, this is what I could make out. Analyzing each statement by breaking up the argument, we get

Premise: Outerville must grow if it is to survive, so, as we have agreed, efforts should be made to attract more residents.

--Premise not conclusion because of 'as we have agreed'

Possible conclusion or sub conclusion: The best strategy for attracting residents is to renovate the train station.

Premise: The numbers of jobs in Center City and of people who prefer to live in suburban towns are increasing.

Premise: With the rise in tolls, driving into the city is becoming more expensive than train travel.

Possible conclusion or sub conclusion: Therefore, people want to live in towns where train travel is convenient and pleasant.

If the sub conclusion is : The best strategy for attracting residents is to renovate the train station.

AND

the conclusion is:
Therefore, people want to live in towns where train travel is convenient and pleasant.

It logically flows like this:

The best strategy is to renovate. Therefore, people want to live in towns where train travel is convenient and pleasant.

Does not sound logical. Let's look at the alternative option:

the sub-conclusion is:
Therefore, people want to live in towns where train travel is convenient and pleasant.

the conclusion is:
The best strategy for attracting residents is to renovate the train station.

Logically, it flows like this:
People want to live in towns where train travel is convenient. Thus, the best strategy is to renovate train station.

Sounds much better. I like it.

Hence the conclusion should be (B).

OA is (B).

PS: This is more of an exercise for me. Others may have figured it out much faster than I did.
Re: CR: Conclusion of argument   [#permalink] 18 Nov 2007, 19:56
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Editorial: The mayor plans to deactivate the city’s fire alarm boxes, 3 05 Sep 2015, 19:28
7 Mayor: the commuters from the nearby suburb of Coldstream pe 7 13 Aug 2014, 15:46
Mayor: the commuters from the nearby suburb of Coldstream 2 08 Aug 2013, 08:33
6 Mayor: The city council has proposed additional funding for 7 19 Nov 2011, 12:03
2 Spokesperson: In the 2006 election of the city mayor, 55% of 15 16 May 2008, 06:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by