nightblade354 wrote:
Medical researcher: As expected, records covering the last four years of ten major hospitals indicate that babies born prematurely were more likely to have low birth weights and to suffer from health problems than were babies not born prematurely. These records also indicate that mothers who had received adequate prenatal care were less likely to have low birth weight babies than were mothers who had received inadequate prenatal care. Adequate prenatal care, therefore, significantly decreases the risk of low birth weight babies.
Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the medical researcher’s argument?
A. The hospital records indicate that many babies that are born with normal birth weights are born to mothers who had inadequate prenatal care.
B. Mothers giving birth prematurely are routinely classified by hospitals as having received inadequate prenatal care when the record of that care is not available.
C. The hospital records indicate that low birth weight babies were routinely classified as having been born prematurely.
D. Some babies not born prematurely, whose mothers received adequate prenatal care, have low birth weights.
E. Women who receive adequate prenatal care are less likely to give birth prematurely than are women who do not receive adequate prenatal care.
Source: LSAT
Records show that premature babies were more likely to have low birth weight than normal babies.
Records also show that women who got adequate prenatal care were less likely to have low birth weight babies (than women who did not get enough care)
Conclusion: Adequate prenatal care significantly decreases the risk of low birth weight babies.
Let's use some variables to see the connections clearly:
Records show A (premature) leads to X (low weight).
Records also show B (inadequate care) leads to X and 'not B' leads to 'not X'.
We conclude that 'not B' will lead to 'not X'.
We need to weaken the argument.
The records show that women who get adequate care were less likely to have low weight babies. From this we are concluding that adequate care decreases the risk of low weight babies. How do we weaken our conclusion? By somehow establishing that records do not reflect reality.
A. The hospital records indicate that many babies that are born with normal birth weights are born to mothers who had inadequate prenatal care.
Irrelevant. This just says that with inadequate care too, normal babies CAN BE born. This doesn't change that with inadequate care, it is MORE LIKLEY to have low weight babies.
B. Mothers giving birth prematurely are routinely classified by hospitals as having received inadequate prenatal care when the record of that care is not available.
This says that A is often classified as B. That 'premature birth' is often classified as 'inadequate care'. This muddies the link between B and X. The link may be between A and X. Since A is often classified as B in reports, that could explain the relation between B and X. Hence report classification may not represent an actual link between care and low birth weight. This does weaken our conclusion.
C. The hospital records indicate that low birth weight babies were routinely classified as having been born prematurely.
This says that X is classified as A (so instead of A leading to X, X may be classified as A). In any case, our conclusion deals with relation of B with X. This is irrelevant.
D. Some babies not born prematurely, whose mothers received adequate prenatal care, have low birth weights.
This says that even with 'not A' and 'not B', X could happen. It doesn't impact us. We are talking about probabilities. With A, there is higher risk of X. With B there is higher risk of X. X could happen with not A and not B too. It doesn't worry us.
E. Women who receive adequate prenatal care are less likely to give birth prematurely than are women who do not receive adequate prenatal care.
It says 'not B' leads to 'not A'. This helps our argument.
Since A leads to X, not A is likely to lead to not X. Hence, indirectly too, 'not B' does seem to lead to 'not X'.
Answer (B)