It is currently 19 Nov 2017, 05:41

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The official salary for judges has always been too low

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Apr 2004
Posts: 130

Kudos [?]: 966 [0], given: 0

Location: Corea
The official salary for judges has always been too low [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Apr 2004, 07:45
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

83% (01:30) correct 17% (00:00) wrong based on 10 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best Candidates to the job. The legislatureтАЩs move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.

Pat: No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative effect.

PatтАЩs response to Mel is inadequate in that it

A. attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members.
B. mistakenly takes the cause of a certain change to be an effect of that change.
C. attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely
D.by pointing to the absence of negative effects simply denies MelтАЩs claim without putting forward any evidence in support of that denial
E. assumes that changes that benefit the most able members of a group necessarily benefit all members of that group.

Kudos [?]: 966 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 292

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Location: US
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Apr 2004, 08:19
Marine,

I think you've mixed your answers up. I really think that the beginning of answer choice D is the phrase that completes C. It doesn't make much sense the way it's written.

C should be "attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely by pointing to the absence of negative effects".

D should be "simply denies MelтАЩs claim without putting forward any evidence in support of that denial"


D is the best answer.

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4284

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Apr 2004, 21:01
Clearly, A is best.

Mel says: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best Candidates to the job

A) says that the ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements will not affect the situation and in that in fact, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. However, Pat's response is based on current members "Since very few judges [current judges] teach or give lectures..." This is not sufficient to explain how that ban will not hamper the recruitment of the best candidates as mentioned in Mel's argument.

D) Pat does give evidence to support his argument. "Since very few judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative effect" is his argument although it is a weak one as explained above
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Mar 2004
Posts: 155

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Location: New York
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Apr 2004, 21:13
Paul wrote:
Clearly, A is best.

Mel says: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best Candidates to the job

A) says that the ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements will not affect the situation and in that in fact, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. However, Pat's response is based on current members "Since very few judges [current judges] teach or give lectures..." This is not sufficient to explain how that ban will not hamper the recruitment of the best candidates as mentioned in Mel's argument.

D) Pat does give evidence to support his argument. "Since very few judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative effect" is his argument although it is a weak one as explained above


Hey Paul, here I go. :)

A here as well, the best answer, imo
_________________

---------------------------------------------------
The more I learn, the more I realize I know nothing!
----------------------------------------------------

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4284

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Apr 2004, 21:19
Welcome back lvb9th :musband
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4284

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Apr 2004, 14:00
I demand that those who said D back up their answers :o
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 344

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Apr 2004, 14:04
Paul wrote:
I demand that those who said D back up their answers :o

gee is this an ultimatum??
Pat's response to Mel about salary is just an opinion without any evidence or convincing logic. Among all the options D comes pretty darn close IMHO.

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Mar 2004
Posts: 155

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Location: New York
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Apr 2004, 17:39
mirhaque wrote:
Paul wrote:
I demand that those who said D back up their answers :o

gee is this an ultimatum??
Pat's response to Mel about salary is just an opinion without any evidence or convincing logic. Among all the options D comes pretty darn close IMHO.


D.by pointing to the absence of negative effects simply denies MelтАЩs claim without putting forward any evidence in support of that denial

Pat states that very few judges teach, so he actually does put some evidence forward to back upi his statements. IMO, D is incorrect, and also incomplete :)
_________________

---------------------------------------------------
The more I learn, the more I realize I know nothing!
----------------------------------------------------

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Apr 2004
Posts: 130

Kudos [?]: 966 [0], given: 0

Location: Corea
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 May 2004, 19:01
Paul wrote:
I demand that those who said D back up their answers :o


hi Paul
apologies for being late in reverting back.
I do not posess the OA for this question, I got this CR frm a yahoo grp archive.

Kudos [?]: 966 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2011
Posts: 16

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 17

Concentration: General Management, Finance
Re: The official salary for judges has always been too low [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jul 2012, 10:51
Obviously A is the answer.

Pat explains that current Judges includes few who teaches or give lectures...whereas Mel was talking about attracting potential candidates which might want to go for teaching and lectures.

So mere raising salary govt. might not still get good quality of judges.....

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 17

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2013
Posts: 61

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 49

Schools: ISB '16, NUS '15
Reviews Badge
Re: The official salary for judges has always been too low [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 May 2014, 08:36
Hi,
We need to weaken the argument stated by PAT,who states that the situation does improve buy citing a evidence about the few judges.

Now option E states that the changes (that is the raise in salary) will benefits most of able members of a group (that is few judges ) will benefits all members of that group.

So isn't it the correct assumption?

Just to know the rights reason to know eliminates this option.

Thanks :)

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 49

Re: The official salary for judges has always been too low   [#permalink] 22 May 2014, 08:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The official salary for judges has always been too low

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.