It is currently 19 Nov 2017, 11:11

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

8 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Nov 2007
Posts: 147

Kudos [?]: 443 [8], given: 0

GMAT ToolKit User
Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jan 2008, 12:32
8
This post received
KUDOS
25
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

50% (01:04) correct 50% (01:13) wrong based on 1046 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best Candidates to the job. The legislature’s move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.

Pat: No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative effect.

Pat’s response to Mel is inadequate in that it

A. attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members.
B. mistakenly takes the cause of a certain change to be an effect of that change
C. attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely by pointing to the absence of negative effects
D. simply denies Mel’s claim without putting forward any evidence in support of that denial
E. assumes that changes that benefit the most able members of a group necessarily benefit all members of that group.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by JarvisR on 26 Aug 2015, 04:13, edited 3 times in total.
OA added and formatted

Kudos [?]: 443 [8], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 575

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 0

Re: Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jan 2008, 13:30
JCLEONES wrote:
Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best
Candidates to the job. The legislature’s move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.

Pat: No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few
judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative
effect.

Pat’s response to Mel is inadequate in that it

A. attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members
of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members.
B. mistakenly takes the cause of a certain change to be an effect of that change
C. attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely
by pointing to the absence of negative effects
D. simply denies Mel’s claim without putting forward any evidence in support
of that denial
E. assumes that changes that benefit the most able members of a group
necessarily benefit all members of that group.


A by POE

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 73

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

Re: Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jan 2008, 14:50
I will go for Option B.
What is the OA?

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2553

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

Re: Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jan 2008, 22:20
ashkrs wrote:
JCLEONES wrote:
Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best
Candidates to the job. The legislature’s move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.

Pat: No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few
judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative
effect.

Pat’s response to Mel is inadequate in that it

A. attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members
of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members.
B. mistakenly takes the cause of a certain change to be an effect of that change
C. attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely
by pointing to the absence of negative effects
D. simply denies Mel’s claim without putting forward any evidence in support
of that denial
E. assumes that changes that benefit the most able members of a group
necessarily benefit all members of that group.


A by POE


A or C.

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Jan 2008
Posts: 5

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jan 2008, 09:31
I pick A. Good question

GMATBLACKBELT wrote:
ashkrs wrote:
JCLEONES wrote:
Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best
Candidates to the job. The legislature’s move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.

Pat: No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few
judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative
effect.

Pat’s response to Mel is inadequate in that it

A. attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members
of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members.
B. mistakenly takes the cause of a certain change to be an effect of that change
C. attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely
by pointing to the absence of negative effects
D. simply denies Mel’s claim without putting forward any evidence in support
of that denial
E. assumes that changes that benefit the most able members of a group
necessarily benefit all members of that group.


A by POE


A or C.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 53

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Re: Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jan 2008, 10:47
I went with B.

What's the OA?

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jan 2008, 12:01
I´ll go with B

JCLEONES wrote:
Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best
Candidates to the job. The legislature’s move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.

Pat: No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few
judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative
effect.

Pat’s response to Mel is inadequate in that it

A. attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members
of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members.
B. mistakenly takes the cause of a certain change to be an effect of that change
C. attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely
by pointing to the absence of negative effects
D. simply denies Mel’s claim without putting forward any evidence in support
of that denial
E. assumes that changes that benefit the most able members of a group
necessarily benefit all members of that group.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: 1 [1], given: 0

Re: Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jan 2008, 01:24
1
This post received
KUDOS
one more vote for B.
please explain the answer!!

Kudos [?]: 1 [1], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Dec 2006
Posts: 167

Kudos [?]: 105 [0], given: 0

Re: Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jan 2008, 08:07
One vote for A.

Kudos [?]: 105 [0], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1078

Kudos [?]: 687 [1], given: 0

Re: Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2008, 05:56
1
This post received
KUDOS
[quote="JCLEONES"]Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best
Candidates to the job. The legislature’s move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.

Pat: No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few
judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative
effect.

Pat’s response to Mel is inadequate in that it

A. attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members
of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members.
I think it's the best choice since the evaluation from Pat take into account only the current members. maybe the change will affect potential members. Is it OA?

B. mistakenly takes the cause of a certain change to be an effect of that change
I have some doubts regarding this choice but I actually don't see cause-effect relationship in the Pat's thought
C. attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely
by pointing to the absence of negative effects

the absence of negative effects is the core of the argument
D. simply denies Mel’s claim without putting forward any evidence in support
of that denial

that's falseE. assumes that changes that benefit the most able members of a group
necessarily benefit all members of that group. false

Kudos [?]: 687 [1], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 864

Kudos [?]: 1105 [0], given: 33

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2008, 18:42
I will mark it as "A". What is the OA?

Kudos [?]: 1105 [0], given: 33

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 617

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 1

Re: Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2008, 20:01
I am going with A.

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 1

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1878

Kudos [?]: 1443 [0], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Premium Member
Re: Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2008, 20:28
marcodonzelli wrote:
JCLEONES wrote:
Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best
Candidates to the job. The legislature’s move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.

Pat: No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few
judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative
effect.

Pat’s response to Mel is inadequate in that it

A. attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members
of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members.
I think it's the best choice since the evaluation from Pat take into account only the current members. maybe the change will affect potential members. Is it OA?

B. mistakenly takes the cause of a certain change to be an effect of that change
I have some doubts regarding this choice but I actually don't see cause-effect relationship in the Pat's thought
C. attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely
by pointing to the absence of negative effects

the absence of negative effects is the core of the argument
D. simply denies Mel’s claim without putting forward any evidence in support
of that denial

that's falseE. assumes that changes that benefit the most able members of a group
necessarily benefit all members of that group. false


Reversely, I think it is E.

Everybody chose A, for me, A is not correct because Pat did not say "how a certain change will affect...", only assumed that very few members of the group are affected by the change, it is necessary that the group also be affected.
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1443 [0], given: 1

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Aug 2007
Posts: 202

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Re: Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jan 2008, 12:15
JCLEONES wrote:
Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best
Candidates to the job. The legislature’s move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.

Pat: No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few
judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative
effect.

Pat’s response to Mel is inadequate in that it

A. attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members
of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members.
B. mistakenly takes the cause of a certain change to be an effect of that change
C. attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely
by pointing to the absence of negative effects
D. simply denies Mel’s claim without putting forward any evidence in support
of that denial
E. assumes that changes that benefit the most able members of a group
necessarily benefit all members of that group.


C - Pat is only clarifying one aspect (negative effect) but that does not necessarily mean that the move does indeed improve the situation.

What is the OA?

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Nov 2007
Posts: 147

Kudos [?]: 443 [0], given: 0

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jan 2008, 13:36
The OA is A.

gmat blows wrote:
JCLEONES wrote:
Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best
Candidates to the job. The legislature’s move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.

Pat: No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few
judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative
effect.

Pat’s response to Mel is inadequate in that it

A. attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members
of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members.
B. mistakenly takes the cause of a certain change to be an effect of that change
C. attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely
by pointing to the absence of negative effects
D. simply denies Mel’s claim without putting forward any evidence in support
of that denial
E. assumes that changes that benefit the most able members of a group
necessarily benefit all members of that group.


C - Pat is only clarifying one aspect (negative effect) but that does not necessarily mean that the move does indeed improve the situation.

What is the OA?

Kudos [?]: 443 [0], given: 0

2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 227

Kudos [?]: 300 [2], given: 25

Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jan 2010, 02:00
2
This post received
KUDOS
14
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best Candidates to the job. The legislature’s move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.

Pat: No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative effect.

Pat’s response to Mel is inadequate in that it

A. attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members.
B. mistakenly takes the cause of a certain change to be an effect of that change
C. attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely by pointing to the absence of negative effects
D. simply denies Mel’s claim without putting forward any evidence in support of that denial
E. assumes that changes that benefit the most able members of a group necessarily benefit all members of that group.

Kudos [?]: 300 [2], given: 25

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Posts: 114

Kudos [?]: 139 [0], given: 3

Location: Mumbai
Re: Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jan 2010, 20:38
I would go with A. What is OA?

Kudos [?]: 139 [0], given: 3

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 227

Kudos [?]: 300 [0], given: 25

Re: Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jan 2010, 07:05
why not C?

Kudos [?]: 300 [0], given: 25

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2009
Posts: 364

Kudos [?]: 199 [0], given: 22

Schools: LBS, INSEAD, IMD, ISB - Anything with just 1 yr program.
Re: Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jan 2010, 07:52
My take is E. What is the OA?
_________________

I am AWESOME and it's gonna be LEGENDARY!!!

Kudos [?]: 199 [0], given: 22

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 214

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 6

Re: Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jan 2010, 08:59
C? What's the OA?

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 6

Re: Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low   [#permalink] 26 Jan 2010, 08:59

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 48 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.