MGMAT Benchmark method for fractions : GMAT Problem Solving (PS)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 19 Feb 2017, 16:36

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# MGMAT Benchmark method for fractions

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 67
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 10

MGMAT Benchmark method for fractions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 May 2011, 18:49
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

50% (01:42) correct 50% (01:07) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Hello

I am a newbie brushing up my basics on Quant. Please help. I am a bit confused with the method the bench mark values used by MGMAT guide 2. In the problem set Chapter 2 Q10

Put these fractions from the least to the greatest

9/17 , 3/6, 19/20 , 7/15

Explanation

9/17 is slightly more than 1/2
3/16 is slightly less than 1/4
19/20 is slightly less than 1
7/15 is slightly less than 1/2.

I am a bit confused with the language. For example how is 3/16 is slightly less than 1/4.

3 x 5 = 15
3 x 6 = 18

so it should fall between 1/5 and 1/6 hence it should be more than 1/4 not less (if i make any sense!)

Same with all the fractions. The language is exactly opposite what i expected it to be.

Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 920
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 346 [0], given: 123

Re: MGMAT Benchmark method for fractions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 May 2011, 20:35
First get the half and quarter and then compare it to the other fraction.

We know this -
1/2 = 9/18 = 7/14
1/4 = 4/16 = 3/12
1 = 19/19

Now -
9/17 is slightly more than 1/2 ----> The half is 9/18. So 9/17 is more than 0.5
3/16 is slightly less than 1/4 ----> The quarter is 3/12. Hence 3/16 is less than 0.25
19/20 is slightly less than 1 -----> 1 whole is 19/19. hence 19/20 is about 0.9
7/15 is slightly less than 1/2 ----> The half is 7/14. hence 7/15 is less than 0.5

melguy wrote:
Hello

I am a newbie brushing up my basics on Quant. Please help. I am a bit confused with the method the bench mark values used by MGMAT guide 2. In the problem set Chapter 2 Q10

Put these fractions from the least to the greatest

9/17 , 3/6, 19/20 , 7/15

Explanation

9/17 is slightly more than 1/2
3/16 is slightly less than 1/4
19/20 is slightly less than 1
7/15 is slightly less than 1/2.

I am a bit confused with the language. For example how is 3/16 is slightly less than 1/4.

3 x 5 = 15
3 x 6 = 18

A good way to look is approx. ie. consider Let x = 3/16. Since 15 is a multiple of 3. Letme write x is close to 3/15 Now x will be less than this since denominator of x is > 15. Hence x is slightly less than 3/15 or 0.2

Hence x is less than 1/4 or 0.25

so it should fall between 1/5 and 1/6 hence it should be more than 1/4 not less (if i make any sense!)

Same with all the fractions. The language is exactly opposite what i expected it to be.

VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1353
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 242 [0], given: 10

Re: MGMAT Benchmark method for fractions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 May 2011, 21:27
3/6 = 1/2

9/17 means it is greater than 9/18 as the denominator is lesser.

7/15 it is slightly lesser than 7/14 as the denominator is greater.

19/20 will have the greatest value close to 1.

thus the order is 7/15 < 3/6 < 9/17 < 19/20.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 2021
Followers: 162

Kudos [?]: 1734 [0], given: 376

Re: MGMAT Benchmark method for fractions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 May 2011, 02:34
melguy wrote:
Hello

I am a newbie brushing up my basics on Quant. Please help. I am a bit confused with the method the bench mark values used by MGMAT guide 2. In the problem set Chapter 2 Q10

Put these fractions from the least to the greatest

9/17 , 3/6, 19/20 , 7/15

Explanation

9/17 is slightly more than 1/2
3/16 is slightly less than 1/4
19/20 is slightly less than 1
7/15 is slightly less than 1/2.

I am a bit confused with the language. For example how is 3/16 is slightly less than 1/4.

3 x 5 = 15
3 x 6 = 18

so it should fall between 1/5 and 1/6 hence it should be more than 1/4 not less (if i make any sense!)

Same with all the fractions. The language is exactly opposite what i expected it to be.

Another approach can be:
9/17 , 3/6, 19/20 , 7/15

Separate 3/6, 19/20 , 7/15 from 9/17
We see that 60 is the lcm for 6,20,15.

3/6, 19/20 , 7/15
Numerators will be: 30, 57, 28
Thus, 7/15 is the least among 3/6,19/20,7/15.

Now;
compare 9/17 with 7/15
7/15(less than 7/14=1/2) is less than 9/17(more than 9/18=1/2) and least among the choices.
***************************************************
7/14=1/2
If the numerator(7) is kept constant:
Increase in denominator will decrease the value of the fraction.
Decrease in denominator will increase the value of the fraction.

If the denominator(14) is kept constant:
Increase in numerator will increase the value of the fraction.
Decrease in numerator will decrease the value of the fraction.
******************************************************
_________________
Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2011
Posts: 755
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 118 [1] , given: 42

Re: MGMAT Benchmark method for fractions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 May 2011, 06:29
1
KUDOS
given $$9/17 3/6 19/20 7/15$$

if you look at given numbers , you should see 9/17 is close to 9/18
3/6 is 1/2
19/20 is close to 1 as numerator and denominator are pretty close.
7/15 is close to 7/14

out of 9/17 and 9/18, we can see they only differ in their denominator, greater the denominator , the smaller fraction it is. so 9/18< 9/17 => 1/2 < 9/17 . In other words we have 9/17 > 1/2
and way less than 1.

same thing with 7/15 and 7/14. if we apply the same reasoning as in the above example , we can see that 7/15 < 7/14 = > 7/15 < 1/2

so going back to our sequence of numbers $$9/17 3/6 19/20 7/15$$

>1/2 1/2 ~=1 <1/2

so increasing order would be <1/2 1/2 >1/2 ~=1

7/15 < 3/6 < 9/17 < 19/20
SVP
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1672
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Followers: 33

Kudos [?]: 519 [0], given: 36

Re: MGMAT Benchmark method for fractions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 May 2011, 04:30
To add to what fluke has suggested, to compare 9/17 with 7/15, cross multiply numerators and denominators, the fraction with the numerator giving the bigger result is greater than the other one.

So 15 * 9 = 135 and 17*7 = 119

So 9/17 > 7/15.
_________________

Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Re: MGMAT Benchmark method for fractions   [#permalink] 11 May 2011, 04:30
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Fraction!!!!!!!!! 1 13 Feb 2011, 05:45
fractions puzzle 2 25 Oct 2010, 01:12
1 Fractions - PS 4 22 Jul 2010, 21:07
2 Fractions 2 16 Jul 2010, 12:22
Fraction question 2 01 Mar 2010, 15:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# MGMAT Benchmark method for fractions

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.