Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Status: Current MBA Student
Joined: 19 Nov 2009
Posts: 119
Concentration: Finance, General Management

Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each she
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Dec 2010, 16:10
Question Stats:
70% (01:52) correct 30% (01:41) wrong based on 510 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each shelf and no books left over. After Michael acquired 10 additional books, he arranged all his books in a new bookcase with 12 books on each shelf and no books left over. How many books did Michael have before he acquired the 10 additional books? (1) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had fewer than 96 books. (2) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had more than 24 books.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49206

Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each she
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Dec 2010, 16:45
Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each shelf and no books left over. After Michael acquired 10 additional books, he arranged all his books in a new bookcase with 12 books on each shelf and no books left over. How many books did Michael have before he acquired the 10 additional books?Let the # of books Michael had before he acquired the 10 additional books be x. Then x must be multiple of 10 as Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each shelf and no books left over. For the same reason x+10 must be a multiple of 12 (basically x+10 must be multiple of 60). (1) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had fewer than 96 books > x<96, so x can be 10, 20, 30, ... 90. From these possible values of x there is only one for which x+10 is a multiple of 12: x=50 > x+10=60. Sufficient. (2) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had more than 24 books > x>24, so x can be 30, 40, 50, ... But as the upper limit of x is not limited there will be infinitely many values of x possible so that x+12 to be a multiple of 12: 110, 170, 230, ... Not sufficient. Answer: A.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics




Manager
Joined: 08 Sep 2010
Posts: 54

Re: Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each she
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jul 2011, 09:58
82. Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each shelf and no books left over. After Michael acquired 10 additional books, he arranged all his books in a new bookcase with 12 books on each shelf and no books left over. How many books did Michael have before he acquired the 10 additional books? (1) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had fewer than 96 books. (2) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had more than 24 book My question is, You can figure out that he had 50 books just by reading the question itself. After he got 10 additional book, each shelf had 12 books. Meaning each shelf had +2. 2(x)=10 =5 Hence 5 shelves. Therefore originally, he had 10 books in each shelf = 50 books. Whats the point of the statements? Or am I missing something?
_________________
Don't forget to give me ****KUDOS****



Retired Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 1869

Re: Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each she
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jul 2011, 10:49
386390 wrote: 82. Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each shelf and no books left over. After Michael acquired 10 additional books, he arranged all his books in a new bookcase with 12 books on each shelf and no books left over. How many books did Michael have before he acquired the 10 additional books?
(1) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had fewer than 96 books.
(2) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had more than 24 book
My question is, You can figure out that he had 50 books just by reading the question itself. After he got 10 additional book, each shelf had 12 books. Meaning each shelf had +2. 2(x)=10 =5
Hence 5 shelves. Therefore originally, he had 10 books in each shelf = 50 books.
Whats the point of the statements? Or am I missing something? Brilliant!!! Even I overlooked that. IMO: This OG question is flawed. Your reasoning is perfect.
_________________
~fluke
GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savings



Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Mar 2011
Posts: 391
Location: Texas

Re: Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each she
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jul 2011, 10:58
He could also have 110 books initially.. so arranged in 11 shelves each having 10 books
when 10 additional books are acquired.. 120 books can be arranged in 10 shelves each having 12 books...
or as you mentioned another possibility is 50 books initially... so in this case only condition A is sufficient and B is insufficient.
this is very interesting question.



Manager
Joined: 08 Sep 2010
Posts: 54

Re: Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each she
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jul 2011, 11:20
agdimple333 wrote: He could also have 110 books initially.. so arranged in 11 shelves each having 10 books
lets assume this... agdimple333 wrote: when 10 additional books are acquired.. 120 books can be arranged in 10 shelves each having 12 books...
I dont think you can just change numbers like that. Say he had 110 books initially, arranged in 11 book shelves. When +10 books are put in the SAME book shelf you CANNOT have 12 books per shelf. The only way to distribute 10 books in 2's is if there were 5 shelves.
_________________
Don't forget to give me ****KUDOS****



Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Mar 2011
Posts: 391
Location: Texas

Re: Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each she
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jul 2011, 11:37
386390 wrote: agdimple333 wrote: He could also have 110 books initially.. so arranged in 11 shelves each having 10 books
lets assume this... agdimple333 wrote: when 10 additional books are acquired.. 120 books can be arranged in 10 shelves each having 12 books...
I dont think you can just change numbers like that. Say he had 110 books initially, arranged in 11 book shelves. When +10 books are put in the SAME book shelf you CANNOT have 12 books per shelf. The only way to distribute 10 books in 2's is if there were 5 shelves. There is NO Assumption. I almost first thought of 50 books... but when i saw the source being official guide, i am sure there could not be any flaw in the question. for your above statements, please read the question again, it says he arranges in NEW BOOK CASE. no where its mentioned in the question that # of book shelves in both books cases are same. i just gave another example of 110 to clarify the doubt... but if you want to use algebra.. lets say he originally had x books.. he arranged 10 books on each shelf, so x is multiple of 10. later he has x+10 books, he arranged 12 books in each shelf... so x+10 is multiple of 12. statement 1  he has less than 96 books.. so x could be 10,20, 30, 40, 50, 60.. then but x+10 could be only 60.. (since it is multiple of 12) x+10 = 60 x = 50 sufficient. statement 2  he has more than 24 books.. so x could be 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110, 120.... 180, 190 and so on... x+10 could be now 60, 120, 180... so x could be 50, 110, 170 not sufficient. hope this helps!



Manager
Joined: 31 May 2011
Posts: 81
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
GMAT Date: 12072011
GPA: 3.22
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

Re: Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each she
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jul 2011, 12:02
fluke wrote: 386390 wrote: 82. Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each shelf and no books left over. After Michael acquired 10 additional books, he arranged all his books in a new bookcase with 12 books on each shelf and no books left over. How many books did Michael have before he acquired the 10 additional books?
(1) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had fewer than 96 books.
(2) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had more than 24 book
My question is, You can figure out that he had 50 books just by reading the question itself. After he got 10 additional book, each shelf had 12 books. Meaning each shelf had +2. 2(x)=10 =5
Hence 5 shelves. Therefore originally, he had 10 books in each shelf = 50 books.
Whats the point of the statements? Or am I missing something? Brilliant!!! Even I overlooked that. IMO: This OG question is flawed. Your reasoning is perfect. Fluke i don't think the question is flawed. The question says the books are equally divided by 10 and again by 12 after 10 more books are added. Hence lets check the factor of 10 and 12. Factor 10: 2,5 Factor 12: 2,2,3 Factor N (number of books) = 2,2,3,5,??? Hence the number of after addition of 10 books can be a multiple of 60. So it can be 60, 120 ,180,etc with initial no. of books as 50,110,170,etc... Hence from statement 1: no. of books is less than 96. Hence sufficient as we have only one value Statement 2: no of books greater than 24 so we can have more than one value hence insufficient. So A.



Retired Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 1869

Re: Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each she
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Jul 2011, 00:43
Sudhanshuacharya wrote: fluke wrote: 386390 wrote: 82. Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each shelf and no books left over. After Michael acquired 10 additional books, he arranged all his books in a new bookcase with 12 books on each shelf and no books left over. How many books did Michael have before he acquired the 10 additional books?
(1) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had fewer than 96 books.
(2) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had more than 24 book
My question is, You can figure out that he had 50 books just by reading the question itself. After he got 10 additional book, each shelf had 12 books. Meaning each shelf had +2. 2(x)=10 =5
Hence 5 shelves. Therefore originally, he had 10 books in each shelf = 50 books.
Whats the point of the statements? Or am I missing something? Brilliant!!! Even I overlooked that. IMO: This OG question is flawed. Your reasoning is perfect. Fluke i don't think the question is flawed. The question says the books are equally divided by 10 and again by 12 after 10 more books are added. Hence lets check the factor of 10 and 12. Factor 10: 2,5 Factor 12: 2,2,3 Factor N (number of books) = 2,2,3,5,??? Hence the number of after addition of 10 books can be a multiple of 60. So it can be 60, 120 ,180,etc with initial no. of books as 50,110,170,etc... Hence from statement 1: no. of books is less than 96. Hence sufficient as we have only one value Statement 2: no of books greater than 24 so we can have more than one value hence insufficient. So A. Sorry for the confusion. I overlooked the word "new bookcase". A is the correct answer.
_________________
~fluke
GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savings



Manager
Status: Quant 50+?
Joined: 02 Feb 2011
Posts: 104
Concentration: Strategy, Finance

Re: Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each she
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Aug 2011, 10:52
I am not understanding something here.
X has to be divisible by 10, and x+10 has to be divisible by 12...
To me this only occurs when x=50, x+10 = 60
If x =100, 110 is not divisible by 12?
Maybe my brain is just broken atm?



Retired Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 1869

Re: Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each she
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Aug 2011, 11:02
eragotte wrote: I am not understanding something here.
X has to be divisible by 10, and x+10 has to be divisible by 12...
To me this only occurs when x=50, x+10 = 60
If x =100, 110 is not divisible by 12?
Maybe my brain is just broken atm? Yeah, even I overlooked the surreptitious adjective "new" when I was solving it. Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each shelf and no books left over. After Michael acquired 10 additional books, he arranged all his books in a new bookcase with 12 books on each shelf and no books left over. How many books did Michael have before he acquired the 10 additional books?
_________________
~fluke
GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savings



Manager
Status: Quant 50+?
Joined: 02 Feb 2011
Posts: 104
Concentration: Strategy, Finance

Re: Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each she
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Aug 2011, 11:08
fluke wrote: eragotte wrote: I am not understanding something here.
X has to be divisible by 10, and x+10 has to be divisible by 12...
To me this only occurs when x=50, x+10 = 60
If x =100, 110 is not divisible by 12?
Maybe my brain is just broken atm? Yeah, even I overlooked the surreptitious adjective "new" when I was solving it. Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each shelf and no books left over. After Michael acquired 10 additional books, he arranged all his books in a new bookcase with 12 books on each shelf and no books left over. How many books did Michael have before he acquired the 10 additional books? for whatever reason this response made my brain start functioning again. thanks haha



Manager
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 222

Re: Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each she
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Aug 2011, 19:18
what if there are left overs..let's say this:
Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each shelf with 2 left over. After Michael acquired 10 additional books, he arranged all his books in a new bookcase with 12 books on each shelf with 3 leftovers.
Can someone help me understand how to solve such a question?



Manager
Joined: 28 May 2011
Posts: 167
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, International Business
GPA: 3.6
WE: Project Management (Computer Software)

Re: Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each she
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Aug 2011, 12:19
DeeptiM wrote: what if there are left overs..let's say this:
Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each shelf with 2 left over. After Michael acquired 10 additional books, he arranged all his books in a new bookcase with 12 books on each shelf with 3 leftovers.
Can someone help me understand how to solve such a question? Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each shelf with 2 left over. => Number of books, N1 = 10M+2 ; M is an integerhe arranged all his books in a new bookcase with 12 books on each shelf with 3 leftovers. => Number of books, N2 = 12K+3 ; K is an integerN2 comes After Michael acquired 10 additional books in N1 => N1+10 = N2 => 10M+2+10 = 12K+3 => (10M+9)/12 = KWe need to see, if we can find one and only value of M so that (10M+9) is divisible by 12Statement I : Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had fewer than 96 books N1<96 => 10M+2<96 => M < 9.4 => so possible values of M = {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9} none of these possible values satisfy the condition (10M+9) is divisible by /12 So Not  sufficientStatement II : (Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had fewer than 96 books) N1>24 => 10M+2>24 => M > 2.2 => so possible values of M = {3,4,5,6,7,8,9......Infinite set} This is an Infinite set of possible values, So Not  sufficient eitherCombining both of these also doesn't give us anything which could give us any possible value of M that could satisfy the required condition. So answer of this modified question would be E
_________________
 http://gmatclub.com/forum/aguidetotheofficialguide13forgmatreview134210.html 



Intern
Joined: 01 Jun 2012
Posts: 20
Location: United States
Concentration: Nonprofit
GPA: 3.83

Re: Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each she
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Nov 2012, 23:28
Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each shelf and no books leftover. After Michael acquired 10 additional books, he arranged all his books in a new bookcase with 12 books on each shelf and no books left over. How many books did Michael have before he acquired the 10 additional books?
1) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had fewer than 96 books. 2) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had more than 24 books.
In my mind, you don't even need the options. The answer is that he had 50 books before he added 10 new books. The OA does not agree with me. Why can't you automatically determine that the answer is 50? What am I missing?



VP
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1239
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75

Re: Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each she
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Nov 2012, 23:36
egiles wrote: Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each shelf and no books leftover. After Michael acquired 10 additional books, he arranged all his books in a new bookcase with 12 books on each shelf and no books left over. How many books did Michael have before he acquired the 10 additional books?
1) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had fewer than 96 books. 2) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had more than 24 books.
In my mind, you don't even need the options. The answer is that he had 50 books before he added 10 new books. The OA does not agree with me. Why can't you automatically determine that the answer is 50? What am I missing? Its a case of LCM. Initially Michael arranged the books in a shelf of 10 with no left overs. MULTIPLE OF 10 After Michael acquired 10 additional books, he arranged those in a shelf of 12 with no left overs. A MULTIPLE OF 12 Therefore the question is asking the desired LCM of 10 and 12 i.e. 60, 120, 180 etc Statement 1)Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had fewer than 96 books. The only LCM of 10 and 12 under 96 is 60. Hence we have sufficient information to answer the question. Statement 2)Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had more than 24 books. More than 24 could be anything in thousands, millions which are an LCM of 10 and 12. Clearly InsufficientHence A
_________________
Prepositional Phrases ClarifiedElimination of BEING Absolute Phrases Clarified Rules For Posting www.UnivScholarships.com



VP
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1191
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)

Re: Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each she
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Nov 2012, 00:31
egiles wrote: Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each shelf and no books leftover. After Michael acquired 10 additional books, he arranged all his books in a new bookcase with 12 books on each shelf and no books left over. How many books did Michael have before he acquired the 10 additional books?
1) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had fewer than 96 books. 2) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had more than 24 books.
In my mind, you don't even need the options. The answer is that he had 50 books before he added 10 new books. The OA does not agree with me. Why can't you automatically determine that the answer is 50? What am I missing? We have 10x + 10 = 12y i.e 5(x+1) = 6y Note that we are not told that he arranges the books in the same number of shelves. Hence the number of shelves before the purchase and no. of shelves after the purchase are unknown.We can have several integer values of x giving integer values for y. Eg: x = 5, y = 5, or x = 11, y = 10 and many more. But you can see that the question statement alone is not sufficient. We need a statement limiting the values that x and hence y can take. 1) Only x = 5 and y = 5 satisfy this condition. The next lowest values of x can only be 11 for which 10x will exceed 96. Sufficient. 2)Insufficient. x can be 5,11 or even several other numbers greater. Answer is hence A. Kudos Please... If my post helped.
_________________
Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.
Thanks To The Almighty  My GMAT Debrief
GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types



Manager
Joined: 22 Jan 2014
Posts: 177
WE: Project Management (Computer Hardware)

Re: Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each she
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Sep 2014, 10:47
tonebeeze wrote: Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each shelf and no books left over. After Michael acquired 10 additional books, he arranged all his books in a new bookcase with 12 books on each shelf and no books left over. How many books did Michael have before he acquired the 10 additional books?
(1) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had fewer than 96 books.
(2) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had more than 24 books.
Hey all,
I got this problem correct, but I spent way too much time on it. I was looking for an alternate method of solving this problem.
Thanks! Let the shelves in book shelf 1 be x. Let the shelves in book shelf 2 be y. at first he had 10x books then he had 12y books (after purchasing 10 more) => 10x+10 = 12y 1) 10x < 96 x = 1,2,3,...,8 now only for x = 5 we get 10x+10 to be a multiple of 12 so 1 is sufficient. 2) 10x > 24 x = 6,12,18,... all suffice here so 2 is insufficient.
_________________
Illegitimi non carborundum.



Intern
Joined: 02 Mar 2015
Posts: 31

Re: Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each she
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Nov 2015, 04:10
Bunuel wrote: tonebeeze wrote: Hey all,
I got this problem correct, but I spent way too much time on it. I was looking for an alternate method of solving this problem.
Thanks!
82. Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each shelf and no books left over. After Michael acquired 10 additional books, he arranged all his books in a new bookcase with 12 books on each shelf and no books left over. How many books did Michael have before he acquired the 10 additional books?
(1) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had fewer than 96 books.
(2) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had more than 24 books. Let the # of books Michal had before he acquired the 10 additional books be x. Then x must be multiple of 10 as Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each shelf and no books left over. For the same reason x+10 must be a multiple of 12 (basically x+10 must be multiple of 60). (1) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had fewer than 96 books > x<96, so x can be 10, 20, 30, ... 90. From these possible values of x there is only one for which x+10 is a multiple of 12: x=50 > x+10=60. Sufficient. (2) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had more than 24 books > x>24, so x can be 30, 40, 50, ... But as the upper limit of x is not limited there will be infinitely many values of x possible so that x+12 to be a multiple of 12: 110, 170, 230, ... Not sufficient. Answer: A. I don't understand we can not use both statements? i mean x = number of shelf total books = 10x total with additional books = 10 + 10x = 12x => x = 5 number old books = 5x = 50 what do you think ? what iam missing? what is the problem ?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49206

Re: Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each she
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Nov 2015, 04:17
jimwild wrote: Bunuel wrote: tonebeeze wrote: Hey all,
I got this problem correct, but I spent way too much time on it. I was looking for an alternate method of solving this problem.
Thanks!
82. Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each shelf and no books left over. After Michael acquired 10 additional books, he arranged all his books in a new bookcase with 12 books on each shelf and no books left over. How many books did Michael have before he acquired the 10 additional books?
(1) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had fewer than 96 books.
(2) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had more than 24 books. Let the # of books Michal had before he acquired the 10 additional books be x. Then x must be multiple of 10 as Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each shelf and no books left over. For the same reason x+10 must be a multiple of 12 (basically x+10 must be multiple of 60). (1) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had fewer than 96 books > x<96, so x can be 10, 20, 30, ... 90. From these possible values of x there is only one for which x+10 is a multiple of 12: x=50 > x+10=60. Sufficient. (2) Before Michael acquired the 10 additional books, he had more than 24 books > x>24, so x can be 30, 40, 50, ... But as the upper limit of x is not limited there will be infinitely many values of x possible so that x+12 to be a multiple of 12: 110, 170, 230, ... Not sufficient. Answer: A. I don't understand we can not use both statements? i mean x = number of shelf total books = 10x total with additional books = 10 + 10x = 12x => x = 5 number old books = 5x = 50 what do you think ? what iam missing? what is the problem ? When the first statement is sufficient alone and the second is not, the answer is A. Also, you cannot use information given in one statement when evaluating another.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics




Re: Michael arranged all his books in a bookcase with 10 books on each she &nbs
[#permalink]
12 Nov 2015, 04:17



Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 36 posts ]



