Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 16:47 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 16:47

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2011
Posts: 53
Own Kudos [?]: 218 [20]
Given Kudos: 15
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2642
Own Kudos [?]: 7775 [17]
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
General Discussion
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42103 [0]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2642
Own Kudos [?]: 7775 [1]
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
Re: More and more holidaymakers are choosing to fly to remote [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
No, akbism, there's no such rule. For instance, we might say either of these:

My kids don't like olives, perhaps because they are so salty.
My kids don't like olives; in fact, they avoid all salty foods.

As in so many sentences, we have to use meaning. True, we want to reduce ambiguity when possible, and it is never wrong to repeat a noun, but the antecedent of "they" is pretty clear in this sentence.
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Status:Done with formalities.. and back..
Posts: 525
Own Kudos [?]: 1187 [3]
Given Kudos: 23
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Olin - Wash U - Class of 2015
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: More and more holidaymakers are choosing to fly to remote [#permalink]
1
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
avaneeshvyas wrote:
More and more holidaymakers are choosing to fly to remote islands in search of the perfect beach; seeking sand, sun and palm trees, rather than centers of entertainment.

A. ; seeking sand, sun and palm trees, rather than centers of entertainment.
B. ; seeking sad, sun, palm trees and not entertainment.
C. , with sand, sun, palm trees and no entertainment.
D. , they seek sand, sun and palm trees, rather than entertainment centers.
E. ; they seek sand, sun and palm trees, rather than centers of entertainment.


Kindly break down each option and explain the problems associated with each.....also if somebody could point out the correct usage of a semicolon(;) and a colon(:) in a sentence, then it would be very helpful.....

You can join two independent clauses with a semicolon. These two clauses can stand on their own as complete sentences.
You join one independent clause with a dependent clause using FANBOYS and comma.

Ans E it is.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 39
Own Kudos [?]: 205 [0]
Given Kudos: 25
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Send PM
Re: More and more holidaymakers are choosing to fly to remote [#permalink]
Vips0000 wrote:
avaneeshvyas wrote:
More and more holidaymakers are choosing to fly to remote islands in search of the perfect beach; seeking sand, sun and palm trees, rather than centers of entertainment.

A. ; seeking sand, sun and palm trees, rather than centers of entertainment.
B. ; seeking sad, sun, palm trees and not entertainment.
C. , with sand, sun, palm trees and no entertainment.
D. , they seek sand, sun and palm trees, rather than entertainment centers.
E. ; they seek sand, sun and palm trees, rather than centers of entertainment.


Kindly break down each option and explain the problems associated with each.....also if somebody could point out the correct usage of a semicolon(;) and a colon(:) in a sentence, then it would be very helpful.....

You can join two independent clauses with a semicolon. These two clauses can stand on their own as complete sentences.
You join one independent clause with a dependent clause using FANBOYS and comma.

Ans E it is.


Does the word seeking in option A stops the second part of the sentence from being a independent clause?
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Status:Done with formalities.. and back..
Posts: 525
Own Kudos [?]: 1187 [1]
Given Kudos: 23
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Olin - Wash U - Class of 2015
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: More and more holidaymakers are choosing to fly to remote [#permalink]
1
Kudos
avaneeshvyas wrote:
Vips0000 wrote:
avaneeshvyas wrote:
More and more holidaymakers are choosing to fly to remote islands in search of the perfect beach; seeking sand, sun and palm trees, rather than centers of entertainment.

A. ; seeking sand, sun and palm trees, rather than centers of entertainment.
B. ; seeking sad, sun, palm trees and not entertainment.
C. , with sand, sun, palm trees and no entertainment.
D. , they seek sand, sun and palm trees, rather than entertainment centers.
E. ; they seek sand, sun and palm trees, rather than centers of entertainment.


Kindly break down each option and explain the problems associated with each.....also if somebody could point out the correct usage of a semicolon(;) and a colon(:) in a sentence, then it would be very helpful.....

You can join two independent clauses with a semicolon. These two clauses can stand on their own as complete sentences.
You join one independent clause with a dependent clause using FANBOYS and comma.

Ans E it is.


Does the word seeking in option A stops the second part of the sentence from being a independent clause?

I think I'd rather pose question than answer this -

Would you consider this a complete sentence - "seeking sand, sun and palm trees, rather than centers of entertainment. "
Or more technically, can you find subject and verb both? in - "seeking sand, sun and palm trees, rather than centers of entertainment. "

Hope it helps :-)

wow! thats my 300th post!! :twisted:
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Status:Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Posts: 734
Own Kudos [?]: 1857 [0]
Given Kudos: 70
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Send PM
Re: More and more holidaymakers are choosing to fly to remote [#permalink]
I don't think that any of the answer is correct
reason : none of the choice contains a verb, don't know if "Seek" is considered as verb to make the answer correct.
I think the clause after semi colon must have a verb and subject to make it independent clause
User avatar
AGSM Thread Master
Joined: 19 Jul 2012
Posts: 115
Own Kudos [?]: 713 [1]
Given Kudos: 30
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V28
GPA: 3.3
Send PM
Re: More and more holidaymakers are choosing to fly to remote [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Archit143 wrote:
I don't think that any of the answer is correct
reason : none of the choice contains a verb, don't know if "Seek" is considered as verb to make the answer correct.
I think the clause after semi colon must have a verb and subject to make it independent clause


To know whether a particular word is a verb (especially in case of past participle verb-ed) check if the subject is performing the action. If yes then it is a verb else a modifier.

You can check this link for an excellent article by egmat. It has good examples and practice problems.

ed-forms-verbs-or-modifiers-134691.html
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2016
Posts: 138
Own Kudos [?]: 66 [0]
Given Kudos: 79
Send PM
Re: More and more holidaymakers are choosing to fly to remote [#permalink]
meetmba91 wrote:
Whats wrong with answer choice A??


A semicolon separates two independent clauses. (A) makes the second part of the semicolon a fragment.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Mar 2016
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V32
Send PM
Re: More and more holidaymakers are choosing to fly to remote [#permalink]
manhasnoname wrote:
meetmba91 wrote:
Whats wrong with answer choice A??


A semicolon separates two independent clauses. (A) makes the second part of the semicolon a fragment.


In choice A the part after semicolon is not a clause but a fragment as it does not contain a subject verb pair. Generally the independent clauses are separated by a semicolon, and separating a fragment from a clause using a semicolon is wrong usage. Thus A is clearly incorrect.

However I was surprised to see the answer. Choice D is a run on sentence as it connects independent clauses using a comma. Choice E is quite justified in this question.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2020
Posts: 108
Own Kudos [?]: 47 [0]
Given Kudos: 353
Send PM
Re: More and more holidaymakers are choosing to fly to remote [#permalink]
DmitryFarber wrote:
The GMAT would not make the correct answer hinge on a superficial difference such as "entertainment centers" vs. "centers of entertainment." Semicolon vs. comma is a clear rule; therefore, the answer must be E. (Did you like my semicolon?)


Hi DmitryFarber

Why is E better than A.? I mean why is the use of seeking right after the semi colon wrong.?

Is it because the part after semi colon should be an independent sentence? Seeking .... also seems like independent, doesn't it or am I missing something?

Tagging others just in case
GMATNinja VeritasKarishma AndrewN

Thank you :)

Posted from my mobile device
Director
Director
Joined: 05 Jul 2020
Posts: 590
Own Kudos [?]: 301 [0]
Given Kudos: 154
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
WE:Accounting (Accounting)
Send PM
Re: More and more holidaymakers are choosing to fly to remote [#permalink]
Nups1324 wrote:
DmitryFarber wrote:
The GMAT would not make the correct answer hinge on a superficial difference such as "entertainment centers" vs. "centers of entertainment." Semicolon vs. comma is a clear rule; therefore, the answer must be E. (Did you like my semicolon?)


Hi DmitryFarber

Why is E better than A.? I mean why is the use of seeking right after the semi colon wrong.?

Is it because the part after semi colon should be an independent sentence? Seeking .... also seems like independent, doesn't it or am I missing something?

Tagging others just in case
GMATNinja VeritasKarishma AndrewN

Thank you :)

Posted from my mobile device


"Seeking seeking sand, sun and palm trees, rather than centers of entertainment" is definitely not independent I think. Who is seeking all of that stuff? and yes, you are right in your reasoning that it should separate 2 independent clauses.

I am by no means an expert but I hope it helps.
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Posts: 3512
Own Kudos [?]: 6856 [1]
Given Kudos: 500
Re: More and more holidaymakers are choosing to fly to remote [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Nups1324 wrote:
DmitryFarber wrote:
The GMAT would not make the correct answer hinge on a superficial difference such as "entertainment centers" vs. "centers of entertainment." Semicolon vs. comma is a clear rule; therefore, the answer must be E. (Did you like my semicolon?)


Hi DmitryFarber

Why is E better than A.? I mean why is the use of seeking right after the semi colon wrong.?

Is it because the part after semi colon should be an independent sentence? Seeking .... also seems like independent, doesn't it or am I missing something?

Tagging others just in case
GMATNinja VeritasKarishma AndrewN

Thank you :)

Posted from my mobile device

Hello, Nups1324. The part of the sentence that begins with seeking is, in fact, a phrase, not a clause, so it certainly cannot be called an independent clause. It is not that such a phrase could not constitute an independent clause. Consider the following variant, for example:

Seeking sand, sun, and palm trees, rather than centers of entertainment, draws in more tourists each year than any other activity.

The subject is the gerundive phrase, and draws begins a predicate that helps to create an independent clause. Note, too, that even though there are three nouns following the gerund, the verb continues to be conjugated with seeking: seeking draws in tourists, whether that entails one place or thing or several.

Of the answer choices, only (C) and (E) are grammatically viable. The first two use a phrase after a semicolon in a non-list format, while (D), by joining a second independent clause to a first with nothing more than a comma—i.e. without a conjunction—creates a comma splice.

I would move on from this one. Thank you, in any case, for bringing the question to my attention. If you have further questions, feel free to ask.

- Andrew
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17206
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: More and more holidaymakers are choosing to fly to remote [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: More and more holidaymakers are choosing to fly to remote [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne