It is currently 22 Sep 2017, 04:48

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Most fish in the Red Sea eat corals as a part of the

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Posts: 27

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: Woodland Hills, CA
Most fish in the Red Sea eat corals as a part of the [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Jul 2006, 07:17
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

12. Most fish in the Red Sea eat corals as a part of the everyday diet. If fish does not consume the minimum amount of corals each day, the variety of colorful fish would decrease drastically, which harms the natural balance in the Red Sea's fauna.
Which of the following conclusions matches the statements above the most?

a. Even though it is important to keep as many kinds of fish prosperous, people would never be able to revert the decreasing amount of corals in the Red Sea.
b. Corals are destroyed by industrialization and it's main outcome - pollution. Countries that border with the Red Sea should all group together and do everything possible to reduce and then totally eliminate the risks of destroying corals.
c. After fish in the Red Sea is used to eating less corals each day and the variety of fish decreases, this process would temporarily halt.
d. It is very important to preserve the fauna of the Red Sea for future generations, therefore governments of the countries that border with the Red Sea should grow corals in laboratories and then plant them in the Sea.
e. People should pay more attention to the fish that do not need to consume corals in order to remain fruitful and healthy. Therefore, even though the fauna of the Red Sea would be damaged, there would still remain a lot of beauty.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 21 May 2005
Posts: 19

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Location: Los Angles
Re: GMAT Club CR Series #12: Red Sea Fish [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Jul 2006, 07:26
Only C matches

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2893

Kudos [?]: 314 [0], given: 0

Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008

Show Tags

05 Jul 2006, 08:02
I go for D.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Kudos [?]: 314 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5210

Kudos [?]: 432 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

05 Jul 2006, 08:07
I`ll second that (D). Logically flows...

Kudos [?]: 432 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1399

Kudos [?]: 217 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

05 Jul 2006, 09:19
I was looking at C and it seem the problem here "temporarily"... the argument doesn't say that such process would stop completely or temporarily... as far as I am concerned the variety will decrease and whatever happens after that I don't know (based on the premises)

D looks better... Since corals are part of the diet for fish, to preserve natural balance you need to make sure they eat corals... and if government plants corals then they try to preserve the balance

C is tricky, but D is correct

A B and E are out of scope

Kudos [?]: 217 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 351

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 1

Show Tags

05 Jul 2006, 12:44
Only C can be a valid conclusion.

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 23

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

05 Jul 2006, 15:46
I think B.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 571

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

Location: Munich,Germany

Show Tags

05 Jul 2006, 20:06
I second B.

Countries around the Red Sea should ensure that the corals are not destroyed as a reult of industrialisation and pollution, a step which will help preserve the fauna.

But D also somes close, but can we assume that growing corals in laboratories and then planting it in the sea might actually increase the population of corals and might lead to actually having a negative effect on the fauna.--reason I eliminated D.

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1728

Kudos [?]: 95 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

05 Jul 2006, 21:35
Will go with D.

B is also close but it doesnot talk about preserving the fauna.......

Kudos [?]: 95 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5039

Kudos [?]: 424 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

Show Tags

05 Jul 2006, 21:41
D should be it. It's the most logical conclusion what is presented in the passage -> i.e. If fish does not cosume the minimum amount of corals each day, the variety of fish decreases and this in turn upsets the balance of the red sea's fauna.

So to prevent this, governments should take steps to ensure that the fauna of red sea is preserved.

Kudos [?]: 424 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2004
Posts: 468

Kudos [?]: 132 [0], given: 0

Location: united states

Show Tags

06 Jul 2006, 12:52
D for me as well.

_________________

for every person who doesn't try because he is
afraid of loosing , there is another person who
keeps making mistakes and succeeds..

Kudos [?]: 132 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 06 May 2006
Posts: 791

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 2

Show Tags

06 Jul 2006, 13:30
D.

Difficult choosing b/w B and D. Still not totally sure, but didn't select B as it is inserting a new assertion into the question - industrialization and pollution...
_________________

Uh uh. I know what you're thinking. "Is the answer A, B, C, D or E?" Well to tell you the truth in all this excitement I kinda lost track myself. But you've gotta ask yourself one question: "Do I feel lucky?" Well, do ya, punk?

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 2

Intern
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Posts: 27

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: Woodland Hills, CA

Show Tags

07 Jul 2006, 00:49
a. The question stem has no information about the amount of corals - whether it is increasing or decreasing. Out of scope.
b. Suggests a solution as the conclusion of the discussion.
c. Does not deal with issues presented in active way, therefore is a poor conclusion.
d. Out of scope.
e. Ridiculous and out of scope.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

07 Jul 2006, 00:49
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
In the last few years, a drastic spike in sea temperatures 0 22 Aug 2016, 04:21
If a mechanical aerator is installed in a fish pool, the 5 08 Nov 2007, 08:29
1 Russia's aggressive fishing in the prime fishing grounds of 9 25 Jun 2008, 16:46
Most of the year, the hermit thrush, a North American songbird, eats a 0 22 Mar 2017, 13:22
Bottom trawling is a type of deep-sea fishing that involves dragging 0 09 Jul 2016, 06:55
Display posts from previous: Sort by