Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 May 2017, 18:34

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Most geologists believe oil results from chemical

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Posts: 157
Location: USA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 50 [1] , given: 0

Most geologists believe oil results from chemical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2008, 10:36
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

58% (02:27) correct 42% (02:02) wrong based on 39 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Most geologists believe oil results from chemical transformations of hydrocarbons derived from organisms buried under ancient seas. Suppose, instead, that oil actually results from bacterial action on other complex hydrocarbons that are trapped within the Earth. As is well known, the volume of these hydrocarbons exceeds that of buried organisms. Therefore, our oil reserves would be greater than most geologists believe.

Which of the following, if true, gives the strongest support to the argument above about our oil reserves?

(A) Most geologists think optimistically about the Earths reserves of oil.

(B) Most geologists have performed accurate chemical analyses on previously discovered oil reserves.

(C) Ancient seas are buried within the Earth at many places where fossils are abundant.

(D) The only bacteria yet found in oil reserves could have leaked down drill holes from surface contaminants.

(E) Chemical transformations reduce the volume of buried hydrocarbons derived from organisms by roughly the same proportion as bacterial action reduces the volume of other complex hydrocarbons.
If you have any questions
New!
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 262
Location: nj
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 2

Re: CR : Most geologists believe oil results [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2008, 10:54
It should be E IMO.

because if both chemical transformation and bacteria are reducing hydrocarbon and complex hydrocarbons respectively to the same amount then obviously oil reserves will be more for the one which is in greater quantity beneath the earth( which is the complex hydrocarbon in this case)
Director
Joined: 27 May 2008
Posts: 544
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 335 [0], given: 0

Re: CR : Most geologists believe oil results [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2008, 10:55
E. tranformation ratio is same, its given that there are more complex hydrocarbin than organism

100 organism --> chemical tranformation --> 10 oil
1000 complex hydrocarbon --> bacterial reaction --> 100 oil

means there'll be more oil
Intern
Status: fighting hard..
Joined: 12 Jul 2010
Posts: 28
Schools: ISB, Hass, Ross, NYU Stern
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 24

Re: CR : Most geologists believe oil results [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2010, 07:26
the logic for this question is so far-fetched! I got stumped with this one.
Intern
Joined: 22 Jul 2008
Posts: 45
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Re: CR : Most geologists believe oil results [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2010, 09:46
IMO C ---> Reasoning that the fossils that are formed from abundant fossils strengthen the point that the earth reserves are more.
IS my reasoning flawed
Manager
Joined: 24 May 2010
Posts: 80
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 1

Re: CR : Most geologists believe oil results [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2010, 09:48
I agree it should be E.
_________________

Please give Kudos if you like my post

Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 201
Concentration: General Management, Operations
Schools: HBS '19 (S)
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 349

Re: CR : Most geologists believe oil results [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2013, 02:30
rnemani wrote:
IMO C ---> Reasoning that the fossils that are formed from abundant fossils strengthen the point that the earth reserves are more.
IS my reasoning flawed

even i chose C ... can anyone explain why not C??
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 336
Schools: LBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Followers: 196

Kudos [?]: 384 [0], given: 4

Re: Most geologists believe oil results from chemical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2013, 02:59
Hi,

Let me try and explain.

Answer C tells us that around the world there are lots of places where there are trapped seas and fossils found together. This is exactly the conditions that the opposing argument for oil creation wants.

So it must weaken our argument, which is not what we want. So it is incorrect
_________________

Former GMAT Pill student, now on staff. Used GMATPILL OG 12 and nothing else: 770 (48,48) & 6.0

... and more

Current Student
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 2005
Concentration: Finance
Followers: 68

Kudos [?]: 643 [0], given: 355

Re: Most geologists believe oil results from chemical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Oct 2013, 05:13
vishy007 wrote:
Most geologists believe oil results from chemical transformations of hydrocarbons derived from organisms buried under ancient seas. Suppose, instead, that oil actually results from bacterial action on other complex hydrocarbons that are trapped within the Earth. As is well known, the volume of these hydrocarbons exceeds that of buried organisms. Therefore, our oil reserves would be greater than most geologists believe.

Which of the following, if true, gives the strongest support to the argument above about our oil reserves?

(A) Most geologists think optimistically about the Earths reserves of oil.

(B) Most geologists have performed accurate chemical analyses on previously discovered oil reserves.

(C) Ancient seas are buried within the Earth at many places where fossils are abundant.

(D) The only bacteria yet found in oil reserves could have leaked down drill holes from surface contaminants.

(E) Chemical transformations reduce the volume of buried hydrocarbons derived from organisms by roughly the same proportion as bacterial action reduces the volume of other complex hydrocarbons.

This is a close call between (B) and (E). Our conclusion states that oil reserves would be greater than most geologists believe.
We want to strengthen that claim. Now, first of all. We have that oil reserves > expected.

So for starters, we could use two pieces of evidence to strengthen this relationship.

Let's take a look at B first. We are being told that the current oil reserves are accurate. Therefore if we were to compare them with the new discoveries for bacterial, we could in fact know if the oil reserves would be greater than most scientists believe ONLY IF we could measure the oil reserves from bacterial action accurately, which is not addressed here and this is IMO the thing that makes this answer choice inferior to E.

On the other hand, in E we have that the proportion of oil that could be found from bacterial action measured in volume reduction is similar as that of the buried hydrocarbons. The stimulus already states that there is more volume of complex hydrocarbons than the fossils so given this new piece of information if rates are similar then the oil from this new type of source will be higher. So it is basically saying that there is a good and accurate way to measure these oil reserves. I think this answer choice does a pretty good job in strengthening the argument that oil reserves > expected

So I think E wins this one by a small margin

Hope it helps
Cheers!
J:)
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10369
Followers: 997

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 0

Re: Most geologists believe oil results from chemical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2016, 13:41
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Joined: 14 Dec 2011
Posts: 76
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 74

Re: Most geologists believe oil results from chemical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Mar 2017, 14:32
Can anyone please explain E with the help of some numbers such as volume and proportion. Though i selected E but not able to get it clearly.

Thanks
Re: Most geologists believe oil results from chemical   [#permalink] 24 Mar 2017, 14:32
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
7 Most geologists believe oil results from chemical 10 06 Nov 2016, 23:48
1 If there is an oil-supply disruption resulting in higher 5 26 May 2016, 12:50
2 Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in unsampled 10 21 Mar 2012, 04:48
4 Most geologists believe oil results from chemical 10 05 Jun 2015, 14:40
3 Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in unsampled 41 22 Aug 2016, 09:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by